ChileG
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,241
In a vacuum, no.So the board views this as a bad thing? Is that correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a vacuum, no.So the board views this as a bad thing? Is that correct?
Could you tell us why you think it is a good thing?So the board views this as a bad thing? Is that correct?
I wasn't intending to disagree with you. I was merely saying that, in addition to being Orwellian, it's also impossible.What is the supposed purpose of DOGE? What is the supposed purpose of this fund?
How is that not Doublethink?
musk wants to be the first kid on the block to own the complete set!Trump has also floated using the newly created Sovereign Wealth Fund to buy Tiktok. What screams "government efficiency" more than buying a multibillion dollar social media company?
Saving is always a good thing. Why is it bad?Could you tell us why you think it is a good thing?
It is bad because we don't have a budget surplus, we have a budget deficit. You save money when you have money to save, not when you have debt that you are trying to pay down.Saving is always a good thing. Why is it bad?
“You’ve seen that over the last two weeks we’ve created more wealth, other people have created de-wealth, the people, my predecessors, we’re creating a lot of wealth …”
Bessent: “… we’re going to monetize the asset side of the US balance sheet for the American people …”
You need to have money to actually save. How does this reconcile with the deficits and the debt?Saving is always a good thing. Why is it bad?
Yes, they will invest in chickens and give us the eggs.Could the SWF be used to reduce the cost of eggs ?
Would be with a surplus too considering who's involved.In the absence of a surplus this is simply a slush fund.
That's terrifyingThey may try to transfer the Social Security trust fund (currently ~$1.2T) into it and then buy equities with it instead of treasuries.
The theory would be that if the fund was getting a market return rate rather than the treasuries rate, it would last longer (or might never exhaust) than the current projected exhaustion in 2030-2035ish. The risk, obviously, would be a market downturn when the funds are required to be paid out and the risk that the trust fund gets comingled into a slush fund and the assets are diverted from being paid out as SS benefits.That's terrifying