Trump to take over D.C. Law Enforcement

Thought this was an interesting take worth considering.



"This DC stunt by the Trump administration is the only way they know how to do politics. They’ve done it for a decade now and the Democrats continue to play right into their hands.

====

Step One: Find a tangible, observable universally recognized problem that can be photographed or recorded and played in news clips (graffiti, theft, broken windows, open-air loitering, etc.). In fact, better if the underlying data paints a different picture so academic types inevitably make nuanced arguments in opposition that the pictures and video aren’t indicative of the full picture, etc.

Step Two: Array an exaggerated, unprecedented, and probably illegal state response against the problem that inevitably makes headline news around the country and triggers legal challenges. You now own the issue and are perceived as the actor. “At least he’s finally doing something!” many might say.

Step Three: Frame all the forces challenging the state response on constitutional grounds or otherwise “as weak on crime” and “the ones who made the mess” in the first place. Never credit the legal arguments or care about the Constitution. This is all about the observable problem on people’s screens.

Step Four: Pounce when the opposition says this is “overreach” or “fascism” or that the problem isn’t as bad as we’re making it seem. Continue to paint them as being asleep at the wheel why our cities crumble. Punt legality to the courts and if pressed, just say this is what Trump promised to do.

Step Five: Ignore the actual results of the state response and whether it was successful at stopping the problem. The result doesn’t matter. If we have to demilitarize or never levy a tariff, who cares? The whole point was only to win the PR game. And we came away looking like the tough ones with the “institutional swamp” arrayed against us. The viral videos were endless! “Did you see what Trump said to that one lefty reporter? Hilarious!”

Step Six: Rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat.====

Democrats keep playing right into this stupid playbook and never make their own plays. As a result, Trump is never on the hook for the success or failure of his nonsense schemes and he usually ends up getting credit with voters for at least appearing to attack these observable problems. Meanwhile, the problems get worse while America’s governing leaders engage in nothing but Kabuki theater."
 
^ It's an effective strategy because there's no real way to rebut it. Trump can declare literally anything a crisis, regardless of whether it is or not, and very few people will do anything to check the facts. And if they do, Trump will just say the facts are wrong, and most Pubs trust him over any other source of information.

The most effective counter-strategy, in my view, is to ignore it. Or at least the parts that have an arguable connection to Trump's legitimate power, such as increased law enforcement in DC. Let him do that for a few weeks. It won't make a difference, nobody will feel safer, and Trump will move on to the next thing. The attention right now should be on (1) the clearly illegal and/or immoral aspects of what he's doing, such as moving homeless people into camps against their will, and (2) what Trump is using this to distract from. There's a reason the Obama shit has received almost no traction outside the far right infosphere. Most people are properly just ignoring it.

Now, I do think some cities could be governed better. Parts of DC are rough, no doubt about it. But DC could be the paragon of cleanliness and virtue and Trump would still be doing exactly what he's doing. This is not about DC. It's about (a) power, and (b) distraction.

ETA -- One more thing. More law enforcement could make a real and positive difference in Anacostia or Congress Heights. I don't blame the people who live there for cheering this on. I don't think that's at all what Trump intends to do, though. He said something yesterday about clearing the slums, which is problematic in its own right, but I'm almost sure the more visible law enforcement presence, if there is one, will be in high-traffic tourist and government zones. The point, after all, is not safety. It's spectacle. A show of force.
 
Last edited:

‘Move Out, Immediately:' Trump's vision for ridding DC streets of homeless​

The president has vowed to use "involuntary commitment" to detain people sleeping on the streets of DC.​



“… “We’re going to be removing homeless encampments from beautiful parks, which now, a lot of people can’t walk on,” Trump told reporters, adding that his administration is getting “rid of the people from underpasses and public spaces from all over the city.”

… But it’s unclear exactly how the president’s order for people sleeping outdoors to "move out, immediately" would actually work. In the Aug. 11 order, the president offered few specific details on the logistics of the effort. He told reporters there were “many places” people could go and his administration planned to “help them as much as you can help.”


According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, there were about 5,600 homeless people in Washington, DC down from about 8,300 in 2016. Of those homeless people counted in January 2025, about 1,000 were sleeping on the streets any given night. The majority of the rest were either staying with friends, in hotels or in one of the city's shelters.

There are about 3,200 emergency shelter beds in the city, and about another 1,000 beds in shelters for people transitioning into more permanent housing, according to the DC-based Community Partnership for the Prevention of Homelessness.

Donald Whitehead, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless said all of those shelters are currently at capacity, creating more uncertainty over where Trump would move people on the streets. Whitehead questioned whether the president would consider jailing the homeless, sending them to an unknown location or moving them outside of the city. …”
"But it’s unclear exactly how the president’s order for people sleeping outdoors to "move out, immediately" would actually work. "

Move out of the outdoors...so, move indoors?

Jim Carrey Alrighty Then GIF by Ace Ventura
 
"But it’s unclear exactly how the president’s order for people sleeping outdoors to "move out, immediately" would actually work. "

Move out of the outdoors...so, move indoors?

Jim Carrey Alrighty Then GIF by Ace Ventura
I see another chartered plane to Martha's Vineyard on the horizon.
 
^ It's an effective strategy because there's no real way to rebut it. Trump can declare literally anything a crisis, regardless of whether it is or not, and very few people will do anything to check the facts. And if they do, Trump will just say the facts are wrong, and most Pubs trust him over any other source of information.

The most effective counter-strategy, in my view, is to ignore it. Or at least the parts that have an arguable connection to Trump's legitimate power, such as increased law enforcement in DC. Let him do that for a few weeks. It won't make a difference, nobody will feel safer, and Trump will move on to the next thing. The attention right now should be on (1) the clearly illegal and/or immoral aspects of what he's doing, such as moving homeless people into camps against their will, and (2) what Trump is using this to distract from. There's a reason the Obama shit has received almost no traction outside the far right infosphere. Most people are properly just ignoring it.

Now, I do think some cities could be governed better. Parts of DC are rough, no doubt about it. But DC could be the paragon of cleanliness and virtue and Trump would still be doing exactly what he's doing. This is not about DC. It's about (a) power, and (b) distraction.

ETA -- One more thing. More law enforcement could make a real and positive difference in Anacostia or Congress Heights. I don't blame the people who live there for cheering this on. I don't think that's at all what Trump intends to do, though. He said something yesterday about clearing the slums, which is problematic in its own right, but I'm almost sure the more visible law enforcement presence, if there is one, will be in high-traffic tourist and government zones. The point, after all, is not safety. It's spectacle. A show of force.
I don't think it's really accurate to say Trump hasn't embraced a real problem and I don't think the right way to solve the problem is to ignore it.

The old joke was that Republicans can't govern and Democrats can't get elected. Republicans were the "stupid party" that embraced conspiracy theories and short sighted policies that didn't work in the long run. They still are but now Democrats have had some of the same poor governance issues. Many times, they are too beholden to special interests and party politics to get anything done. They failed on the border. They are failing on homelessness and crime. Ignoring those real issues isn't that different from saying they aren't really issues. Neither are going to work.

Ideally, Democrats take back the good governance mantle they had with Obama and Clinton. Those guys were willing to buck the special interests and were still able to get elected.
 
Last edited:
Well this ought to get intersting real fast when all of the Gadsden flag waving patriots start showing up in droves to DC in order to keep the FedGov from treading on them! Should be any day now. Probably already have some of those convoys loaded up and on the way.

What's that you say?

The Gadsden flag folks aren't headed to DC? So many of my neighbors have that flag on their pickup trucks! It doesn't make sense!

But they insisted that they not be tread on by the federal government!

Someone please explain!!!

Confused What The GIF by Sesame Street
 
Last edited:
I don't think it's really accurate to say Trump hasn't embraced a real problem and I don't think the right way to solve the problem is to ignore it.

The old joke was that Republicans can't govern and Democrats can't get elected. Republicans were the "stupid party" that embraced conspiracy theories and short sighted policies that didn't work in the long run. They still are but now Democrats have had some of the same poor governance issues. Many times, they are too beholden to special interests and party politics to get anything done. They failed on the border. They are failing on homelessness and crime. Ignoring those real issues isn't that different from saying they aren't really issues. Neither are going to work.

Ideally, Democrats take back the good governance mantle they had with Obama and Clinton. Those guys were willing to buck the special interests and still get elected.
I respectfully disagree if you are insinuating that Biden did not govern as well as Clinton and Obama. Biden was the most successful first term president in the last 60 years.
 
Well this ought to get intersting real fast when all of the Gadsden flag waving patriots start showing up in droves to DC in order to keep the FedGov from treading on them! Should be any day now. Probably already have some of those convoys loaded up and on the way.

What's that you say?

The Gadsden flag folks aren't headed to DC? So many of my neighbors have that flag on their pickup trucks! It doesn't make sense!

But they insisted that they not be treaded on by the federal government!

Someone please explain!!!

Confused What The GIF by Sesame Street
Because they read the flag to say "Don't tread on me[, tread on them]"
 
The most effective strategy is to continue to hammer at Trump's weaknesses. This is what the right-wing does, to never let people forget about their bullshit.

Homeless in DC? Why? Because housing is so unaffordable, and Trump is making it worse. The problem isn't that there are homeless people in DC. It's that there are so many Americans who can't afford shelter. And that's your fault, Trump.

Crime? You mean like the theft of hard working Americans' wages with tariffs that make us pay higher prices? They are only talking about this to distract from the fact that they are making life pretty much worse in every way for the American people.
 
I don't think it's really accurate to say Trump hasn't embraced a real problem and I don't think the right way to solve the problem is to ignore it.

The old joke was that Republicans can't govern and Democrats can't get elected. Republicans were the "stupid party" that embraced conspiracy theories and short sighted policies that didn't work in the long run. They still are but now Democrats have had some of the same poor governance issues. Many times, they are too beholden to special interests and party politics to get anything done. They failed on the border. They are failing on homelessness and crime. Ignoring those real issues isn't that different from saying they aren't really issues. Neither are going to work.

Ideally, Democrats take back the good governance mantle they had with Obama and Clinton. Those guys were willing to buck the special interests and were still able to get elected.
Who exactly should get the credit or the blame for DC violent crime already being at a 30-year low?
 
Back
Top