Trump to take over D.C. Law Enforcement

One thing that always remains unexplained: WHY are liberals intent on destroying civilization?

I mean, DC is very liberal and votes Dem. But Dems also try to cover up the crime problem there by faking data? To what end? So they can be crime victims? Like all scapegoating theories (e.g. Nazi racialism), the contradiction at the core is so obvious that it's hard to believe anyone actually takes this shit seriously.
 
nycfan said:
Click to expand...

That "little area" has more people than Wyoming and Vermont and about as many as Alaska and Delaware and several other states. Yet as Trump's action proves these people have no real control over their own territory at all, they're purely under the thumb of the federal government, or in this case the whims and madness of a wannabe autocrat.
 
superrific said:
One thing that always remains unexplained: WHY are liberals intent on destroying civilization?

I mean, DC is very liberal and votes Dem. But Dems also try to cover up the crime problem there by faking data? To what end? So they can be crime victims? Like all scapegoating theories (e.g. Nazi racialism), the contradiction at the core is so obvious that it's hard to believe anyone actually takes this shit seriously.
Click to expand...

I took Miller's comments to imply that DC government is trying to cover up the crimes of the minority population because the government is liberal and soft. I don't agree with those ideas.

However, Miller is attempting to shape the narrative.
 
Tar1978Heel said:
Did the Chief of Police really not know What the chain of command meant…If so not a good look…
Click to expand...
It's a good thing she's not wholly unqualified to be a police chief, in one of the most crime-ridden parts of the country, or anything.

SqJbIr.gif
 
Last edited:
mynameisbond said:
Have you noticed that Trump has been busy stirring up controversy and making headlines in every way he can. We're not hearing much about the Epstein files lately. It's possible the two things might be related.
Just a guess. :coffee:
Click to expand...
Well, yes, it’s a beautiful “squirrel!” for this nation of “squirrel!” watchers.

It’s also an explicit tactic laid out by Project 2025. Let’s be clear, Trump is the useful idiot of the Heritage Foundation ghouls more than he is for anyone else.
 
ZenMode said:
It's a good thing she's not wholly unqualified to be a police chief, in one of the most crime-ridden parts of the country, or anything.

SqJbIr.gif
Click to expand...
You both act as if there's a given that a chain of command to handle the various agencies and actions involved here has been clearly established. It might have been but considering the clusterfuck this administration has been, I wouldn't bet any money I needed on it.
 
finesse said:
You both act as if there's a given that a chain of command to handle the various agencies and actions involved here has been clearly established. It might have been but considering the clusterfuck this administration has been, I wouldn't bet any money I needed on it.
Click to expand...
I'm sure it's a coincidence that the department's former Chief Equity Officer just happens to not know what "chain of command" means. :rolleyes:

But she's totally qualified.
 
finesse said:
And I'm sure you have confirmation that she didn't know what it means. I suspect a better case could be that she queried its existence instead of its meaning.
Click to expand...
Even if she knew what it meant, which is highly unlikely, that kind of a response from a Chief of Police is embarrassing.
 
finesse said:
And I'm sure you have confirmation that she didn't know what it means. I suspect a better case could be that she queried its existence instead of its meaning.
Click to expand...
And I'm sure your defending such buffoonery is partisan hypocrisy because if it had come from someone on the right you would have been all over it like a pig to shit without ever extending any benefit of the doubt.
 
To argue against trump's involvement in dc policing based on falling crime statistics is a losing argument to anyone who doesn't have tds. DC is a crime ridden shit hole and has been almost since dc came under dim control back in the 70's. There are logical arguments that can be made against this action by trump based on other criteria, but citing falling crime statistics that are still among the highest in the nation doesn't demonstrate much intellect.
 
My prediction on this initiative is that ultimately crime will fall in dc due to this move and this will be a winner for trump in the eyes of dc residents and will improve his numbers nationally.
 
ZenMode said:
I'm sure it's a coincidence that the department's former Chief Equity Officer just happens to not know what "chain of command" means. :rolleyes:

But she's totally qualified.
Click to expand...
She knows what it means, dumbass. I get it -- you don't think highly of black people.

But I could very well have said those exact words. "What do you mean, chain of command" is a way of saying, "there is no chain of command, are you fucking kidding me". It's a more polite way of saying that. If I didn't say exactly what she said, I might have responded more like, "what are you talking about, a chain of command in this pigshit seat-of-the-pants, racist administration where one is more evil than the next? They don't know how to tie their goddamn shoes, let alone run a police department."

So I think you should apologize for that load of racist drivel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top