Trump47 Cabinet Picks & First 100 Days Agenda

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 45K
  • Politics 
In all honesty you guys wouldn't know truth if it hit you in the ass because you never step outside the world of the View and maddow. At least I know when fox news is lying.
Whats up with this ridiculous assertion that everyone who leans left watches MSNBC? I honestly don't know anyone personally who does. I do know a ton who watch Newsmax, Fox News, and OAN all the time...but even so i don't assume that every Trump voters does that.
 
Whats up with this ridiculous assertion that everyone who leans left watches MSNBC? I honestly don't know anyone personally who does. I do know a ton who watch Newsmax, Fox News, and OAN all the time...but even so i don't assume that every Trump voters does that.
And on top of that, who actually watches the View? I mean there are clearly people who watch it, but it doesn't even ping my radar as a political show. At least accusing us of watching MCNBC makes some level of sense.
 
Point made.

You are way to involved in the political climate of this country.

You always have been.

Tell me this... How many rights did Trump 45 take from you or anyone you know?

How did he change this country into a "fascists state?"

Did he take away the right for gay marriage? Women to vote?

No... you like to make a huge issue out of a person that you disagree with and scream that the world is ending. It didn't 45 years ago when Reagan was elected and the same group of "intellectuals" were saying the same damn thing.

The schtick is old. Get over it. Your party lost. If you have mental issues, emotional issues over a damn election then I'd suggest you stay off of public boards that offer differing opinions.

Sorry.. thems the facts jack.
Guess you missed the latest where republicans are trying, again, to repeal gay marriage.

Also, 45 had guard rails. Notice most of those people came out against him in the campaign. He is putting nothing but yes men/women into leadership roles this term and he doesn't need to worry about another election, so we will see if this term parallels the first term in anyway.

I hope that in 4 years we can look back and say it didn't turn out like we feared. Guess we will see.
 
The guy in charge of his detail? Yikes. I thought the people on his detail should all have been reassigned to lower profile protectees.
Why, that incident seems to have been a positive for him. It almost makes the conspiracy nuts, saying it was staged, seem credible.
 
In all honesty you guys wouldn't know truth if it hit you in the ass because you never step outside the world of the View and maddow. At least I know when fox news is lying.
It's pretty easy with fox, like trump, the only lie.

I've basically stopped watching TV news.
 
Last edited:
Why, that incident seems to have been a positive for him. It almost makes the conspiracy nuts, saying it was staged, seem credible.
The director of the Service took the heat and resigned, but she sure as hell wasn’t involved in the day-to-day logistics of protecting Trump. That was the responsibility of the guy Trump wants to put in charge of the whole agency. It’s ridiculous to give full organizational oversight to the guy in charge of the biggest agency failure in decades. He had ONE job- protecting Donald Trump. If he wasn’t confident in the security of the site, he shouldn’t have let Trump go out there.
 
Here is a summary of this board (mostly speaking in generalities):

- Moderating is pretty damn fair which is a huge change from IC. You can give back the same level of vitriol you receive without being banned for being a pub.
- There needs to be more conservative posters on this board who are sincere in discussing politics. Certainly don't need more assholes.
I can agree with this.

But when you throw out the TDS bullshit, it doesn't help your cause.

Every conservative here knows if Trump had ran the exact campaign as a Democrat, with the constant lying, divisive, mean approach, that they would say he is unfit. But because he ran as a republican, most just make excuses and pretend the lies are ok.

I really am astonished at how many conservatives say: oh he's not really going to do that. We'll then, why did he say that he plans to do it?

While I disagree with many conservative positions, I don't simply see conservatives as bad people. I do see trump as a bad person. And I question those who claim certain views, but still voted for Trump when he clearly didn't align with those views. Both cannot be true.
 
Last edited:


GIFT LINK —> https://wapo.st/4aiIXlz

“…
Patel moved to the federal public defender’s office in Miami and then to Washington, working as a counterterrorism attorney in the Justice Department’s national security division (NSD).
“He was just a mid-level employee who did what he was asked to do,” one former NSD official said. “He’s exaggerated what he did, but the work he did was fine.”
One area where Patel appears to have amplified his record, this official and others said, was the federal prosecution of the ringleader of the 2012 attack on the diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya. The assault killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador.

The case was handled by the local U.S. attorney’s office in Washington and the FBI. Patel wrote in his book that he was “leading the prosecution’s efforts” at the Justice Department headquarters in Washington and coordinating multiple teams.
The counterterrorism section in which Patel worked was not in the lead, according to the former NSD official. “He didn’t make any prosecutorial decisions,” this person said. Instead, Patel “was one of several line attorneys” supporting the U.S. attorney’s office.
Patel showed little respect for the chain of command, operating above his level of knowledge, according to two people familiar with the case. He left the Benghazi team after less than a year, when complaints reached senior officials in both the U.S. attorney’s office and the NSD, according to former colleagues.
Patel’s career then began shifting toward Trump. In the spring of 2017, Patel moved to Congress and worked for Rep. Devin Nunes (R-California), then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He co-authored a 2018 memo accusing the FBI of abusing its surveillance authority to monitor a former Trump campaign adviser. …”

——

This guy is just not a qualified or serious candidate for this job. Like at all.
 
Guess you missed the latest where republicans are trying, again, to repeal gay marriage.

Also, 45 had guard rails. Notice most of those people came out against him in the campaign. He is putting nothing but yes men/women into leadership roles this term and he doesn't need to worry about another election, so we will see if this term parallels the first term in anyway.

I hope that in 4 years we can look back and say it didn't turn out like we feared. Guess we will see.
Do you have a link to where the GOP is trying to repeal gay marriage? Or is this just another scream at the sky moment that epitomizes today's Democrats and their party.

Please make a list of ALL the constitutional rights and freedoms that President Trump and the GOP took away in his last administration.

I'll wait and see what you come up with.
 
Do you have a link to where the GOP is trying to repeal gay marriage? Or is this just another scream at the sky moment that epitomizes today's Democrats and their party.

Please make a list of ALL the constitutional rights and freedoms that President Trump and the GOP took away in his last administration.

I'll wait and see what you come up with.
STATE POLITICS: Idaho lawmaker introduces resolution on same-sex marriage By Provided by Legislature

Idaho Rep. Heather Scott, R-Blanchard, proposed a measure to the State Affairs Committee asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider the Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and allow Idaho to restore its ban on such unions. It will get a full committee hearing.

Read more at: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news...-politics/article298586433.html#storylink=cpy
 
STATE POLITICS: Idaho lawmaker introduces resolution on same-sex marriage By Provided by Legislature

Idaho Rep. Heather Scott, R-Blanchard, proposed a measure to the State Affairs Committee asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider the Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and allow Idaho to restore its ban on such unions. It will get a full committee hearing.

Read more at: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news...-politics/article298586433.html#storylink=cpy
Where is President Trump's name in this?

Where are the rest of the members of the GOP? Did they all sign on with this?

No. Again.... you lost when you started trying to defend a blatant lie.
 
Do you have a link to where the GOP is trying to repeal gay marriage? Or is this just another scream at the sky moment that epitomizes today's Democrats and their party.

Please make a list of ALL the constitutional rights and freedoms that President Trump and the GOP took away in his last administration.

I'll wait and see what you come up with.
Same way that they attacked abortion, through the supreme court, which certainly does have Trump's influence all over it.
 
Back
Top