sringwal
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 694
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ulbricht, who the prosecutors have sought to prove is that Dread Pirate Roberts, hasn't been charged with murder-for-hire in his Southern District of New York case, though he faces charges that include conspiracies to sell narcotics, launder money and more. (He does, however, face murder-for-hire charges in a separate case in Baltimore.) In fact, the prosecution admitted in court that the purported victims of the Silk Road killings were never found, and that Canadian police couldn't even locate records for anyone with their names.1. The appeals court did not say the sentence was harsh. Again you lie. Here is the Second Circuit's discussion of this point:
Accordingly, while a life sentence for selling drugs alone would give pause, we would be hard put to find such a sentence beyond the bounds of reason for drug crimes of this magnitude. But the facts of this case involve much more than simply facilitating the sale of narcotics. The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Ulbricht commissioned at least five murders in the course of protecting Silk Road's anonymity, a finding that Ulbricht does not challenge in this appeal."
Thus are you incorrect.
2. The reason he wasn't charged with murder was that the government didn't think it could prove beyond a reasonable doubt after it was revealed that the two agents were shaking down criminals for money. That was sheer luck on the part of Ross -- he did what he did, and that the cops had issues was a blessing. Otherwise, he would have been convicted for murder.
The lack of charges means nothing. It doesn't change whether he did it. And he did, as the district court AND three appeals court judges found. They described the evidence as ample and unambiguous.
3. Why would I take that deal? If you're bullshitting, and I know that, then other posters deserve to know that you are bullshitting to them. If you don't post bullshit, then we have no quarrel.
4. I think what's really going on here is that you realized that you got played by the documentaries. And you don't want to admit it to yourself, so instead you lash out at me. It's common bullying. The sin you claim was correcting you; somehow you twisted that into "realizing that at least something is wrong with you, and then you go back to doing the same annoying shit you always do within a couple of days" -- which is not at all an acceptable thing to say, its incredible stupidity notwithstanding. Basically, you're a classic toxic masculinity case.
As a general rule, I think that posts intended to be intentionally hurtful, without any rhetorical connection to the discourse, should warrant discipline. Like this series from the chicken brothers. It's not something we should tolerate. It's bullying. It's pathetic. It reflects poorly on all of us should we indulge this conduct.
Can we let this one go or give it its own thread?Ulbricht, who the prosecutors have sought to prove is that Dread Pirate Roberts, hasn't been charged with murder-for-hire in his Southern District of New York case, though he faces charges that include conspiracies to sell narcotics, launder money and more. (He does, however, face murder-for-hire charges in a separate case in Baltimore.) In fact, the prosecution admitted in court that the purported victims of the Silk Road killings were never found, and that Canadian police couldn't even locate records for anyone with their names.
![]()
Read the Transcript of Silk Road's Boss Ordering 5 Assassinations
Many of the ideological supporters of the Silk Road have described its sprawling online black market for drugs as an experiment in victimless crime and a nonviolent alternative to the bloody turf wars of the streets. But prosecutors in the trial of Ross Ulbricht, the 30-year-old accused of...www.wired.com
It's all about winning.The people and things that seem to be winning from Trump 2.0 —
1. J6 insurrectionists
2. Tech billionaires
3. Trump and Melania themselves, on behalf of rug-pullers everywhere
4. Natural disasters
5. Bird flu and other global contagions
6. Consolidated and unfettered executive power
From what I can tell, everyone else is already down 21-0 five minutes into the game. But congrats to the winners, I guess?
Welcome back, CFord, to the board and to NC..I tell you what, man, it looks like I picked the right date- May 30, the day before hurricane season!- to leave Third World Alabama for good and move back to good ol’ home sweet North Carolina.
Eggs and gas jumped since he startedSo much FAFO. So little time.
Oops!
Or Elon helped rig it70 million people voted for this piece of shit. Unbelievable.
The funny thing is that many of the ones bitching and moaning about the price of eggs shelled out thousands to go to Washington for the inauguration.Eggs and gas jumped since he started
Thank goodness I can afford this winning. But those MAGAs who were only struggling because of Biden must be loving it
That account can be followed on Bluesky.What's the X thing from which you post?
My wife's grandfather was a high ranking foreign service officer (he shut down and transferred the Baghdad embassy to Belgium in 1972, who were caretakers till 1984, wrote the literal book on diplomatic immunity etc.) Though she didn't go into the foreign service herself, she was furious at what he did to the State Department in the first term, and already back at that level 72 hours in. I am sorry your situation has been destroyed.As a husband of a foreign service officer who was planning to work a remote State job while we’re in our next post in Africa this administration has totally fucked me. What a bunch of fucking clowns.
The egg industry.The people and things that seem to be winning from Trump 2.0 —
1. J6 insurrectionists
2. Tech billionaires
3. Trump and Melania themselves, on behalf of rug-pullers everywhere
4. Natural disasters
5. Bird flu and other global contagions
6. Consolidated and unfettered executive power
From what I can tell, everyone else is already down 21-0 five minutes into the game. But congrats to the winners, I guess?
7. Anti Science, Anti Evidence, Anti fact anti-vaxxersThe people and things that seem to be winning from Trump 2.0 —
1. J6 insurrectionists
2. Tech billionaires
3. Trump and Melania themselves, on behalf of rug-pullers everywhere
4. Natural disasters
5. Bird flu and other global contagions
6. Consolidated and unfettered executive power
From what I can tell, everyone else is already down 21-0 five minutes into the game. But congrats to the winners, I guess?
I saw one of these douchebags on the DC metro yesterday. Black sweatpants, white sneakers purposefully untied in a slip on manner, black oversized sweater with vertical leather stripes, plaid cashmere scarf that looked like it came from a 2010 A&F print catalogue, aviator sunglasses (while riding the metro), a gold chain with a tennis ball sized dollar sign on it like it was borrowed from a Run DMC video and a black on black MAGA hat. Also looked like all he ate was protein powder and steroids. I could see his insecure ass crying about the cost of eggs while wearing $500 worth of dbag gear.The funny thing is that many of the ones bitching and moaning about the price of eggs shelled out thousands to go to Washington for the inauguration.
I suppose they're willing to wait for more important stuff to get done first. I mean, who hasn't wanted 1,500 violent criminals to be released? And hasn't everyone wanted to call an Episcopal Bishop, asking for mercy, a "nasty woman"?
I know I follow him thereThat account can be followed on Bluesky.