I watched Marty Supreme this weekend. It had its moments and I'd say I enjoyed it overall but I wasn't blown away by it. The end seemed bit contrived. Or something. I guess contrived isn't a good word to use since all art is contrived in a sense, but I didn't find it terribly satisfying.
Also (stop reading if you haven't seen the movie, although this isn't really any kind of big spoiler) was Kevin O'Leary's character really a vampire? My ears perked up when he told Marty that he was a vampire and had been born in 1601, but I didn't really take it seriously at first, then I started thinking hmmm, was he really a vampire? I asked Gemini about it and it said the way it was presented probably meant that it was metaphorical, but that the director (and O'Leary) were really pushing for him to be a real vampire, to the point that the last scene was to be Marty (in old age makeup) in the 1980's at a concert with his granddaughter, and O'Leary appears, unaged, and bites him on the neck.
Evidently the studio didn't go for that (they thought the director was trolling them with that whole story line (well, it wouldn't have actually been a storyline, but a plot point, albeit a very dramatic and out of left field plot point) and nixed the whole idea. I think I would've liked that ending better than the one they ended up with...