Duke Mu
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,610
Schumer is weak and horrible. Replace with Mark Kelly as the Dem Senatorial leader ASAP.No Schumer lost. Total defeat and surrender.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Schumer is weak and horrible. Replace with Mark Kelly as the Dem Senatorial leader ASAP.No Schumer lost. Total defeat and surrender.
Schumer would fumble a 4 ace hand.Am I correct that Schumer's explanation was that to shut the government down would hand Republicans too much power to cut innocent Federal Employees? And that there was nothing to gain by shutting down? Lessor of two bad choices?
And that Democrats would get blamed for not caving?
Well yes, Trump would have used it to do bad things. No argument there. But all Democrats had to do was point out that it would be Trump's choice to do the bad things. Frankly, as bad as the results of what Trump would have done would have been...........it would have been messaging gold for the Democrats. If Schumer wasn't able to use the gold, then what does that say?
The Orange Bully will simply run the same power play again and again. Schumer is SO WEAK.I am so sick and tired of the Democratic Party. Chuck Schumer has got to be the biggest, spineless twat waffle. Trump basically dared them to do it. He knows when push comes to shove the Democrats will cave. Why the hell are they asking us not to give in when they continually keep taking it and then begging for more? It's hard to maintain any sort of will to fight when your elected officials just roll over and capitulate every damn time. I don't have the energy to give a shit when they clearly don't give a damn.
There won't be a country left.Agreed. But Republicans are duke. They are a 10 point favorite. Hoping for some portal additions in 2026.
Strongly disagree. You can't let illegal Executive overreach get codified. HUGE mistake. Dems are going to get run over for 2 more years.My husband have been arguing about how to handle this for at least six weeks and I consistently argued against a filibuster shutdown for most of the reasons that Schumer ultimately articulated.
That said, his handling of getting from the House passage to this vote was political malpractice. He is not up to the job anymore and needs replaced even though I think this is the correct strategic decision.
There's tactics and then there is winning the game. Hate to say it, but the quicker Trump way overreaches might be the best way to win the game in the end. Although, I certainly get its an unpleasant call.My husband have been arguing about how to handle this for at least six weeks and I consistently argued against a filibuster shutdown for most of the reasons that Schumer ultimately articulated.
That said, his handling of getting from the House passage to this vote was political malpractice. He is not up to the job anymore and needs replaced even though I think this is the correct strategic decision.
There's tactics and then there is winning the game. Hate to say it, but the quicker Trump way overreaches might be the best way to win the game in the end. Although, I certainly get its an unpleasant call.
Disagree. He's already doing what he wants and disregarding Congress anyway.I can not deny Shumers basic premise that Congress shutting down would give orangeturd way more power
This has been my position for a few months now.There's tactics and then there is winning the game. Hate to say it, but the quicker Trump way overreaches might be the best way to win the game in the end. Although, I certainly get its an unpleasant call.
GotchaDisagree. He's already doing what he wants and disregarding Congress anyway.
What is the most stupid is people like Fetterman openly saying "I will never vote to shut down the government" which is a great way of confirming to Pubs that there is no reason they have to even consider working with Dems on the terms of any future continuing resolution.
What does this mean? Maybe you think there is intellectual content there, but what I see is an empty platitude that could apply equally in any context.Correct. You Play to Win the Game.
He's also been a Senator for how long? He's not anywhere near a leadership position. There are plenty of non-Schumer choices well ahead of him.He’s a bit pugilistic, swing-state, centric, been in the pubic eye a long time, and the right demos. Not sure it’s much more than that. He fails to inspire my confidence.
Seniority over all is how we get Schumer in the first place.He's also been a Senator for how long? He's not anywhere near a leadership position. There are plenty of non-Schumer choices well ahead of him.
I'm not talking about seniority over all. You can say, "well, a fourth-term Senator isn't necessarily a better choice than a third-term Senator" and that's fine. But Kelly is a first-term Senator. It's hard to imagine him being an effective leader. Moreover, usually leaders start by leading committees or taking lesser roles within the Senate leadership, which can be seen as a test of their leadership abilities.Seniority over all is how we get Schumer in the first place.
I'm okay with exploring alternatives not related to how long they have held down a chair.
I get that thinking but I also think there's a not-too-outlandish belief that we won't make it to September without something akin to a cold civil war...hell...maybe even a hot one.Schumer, meanwhile, told reporters he thinks Democrats might be able to get a better deal since Trump will be less popular come September and that Republican appropriators might be more willing to stand up to him. Trump’s approval numbers have dipped in recent weeks, especially due to his handling of the economy and turmoil in the stock market.
It’s possible that Trump’s approval rating nosedives even more in the next six months, but history has shown that congressional Republicans are far more likely to bend the knee than risk angering the president or his supporters. HUFFPOST
There was a strategy after all.