Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My brother in ZZL, The impacts of this bill have been discussed ad nauseam in this thread. There are virtually unlimited numbers of sources of the potential impacts for ill and good (mostly ill) that this bill promises, And many of them have been brought here and discussed and dissected.is the sky really falling or falling just because the blues arent getting their way?
It is already going the other way. Dumb is what Trump does best. Actually, it's all he's ever done.Oh I agree...if anything it goes the other way, which would be really dumb.
The name is hilarious to me, and that’s without comment on any good or bad things within the bill.Now that I am starting to see references to the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” in legal documents it is so gross that is the actual name of this law. I know all the naming conventions of this century tend to be some kind of BS anyway, but still … just heavy sigh.
I am all in favor of Anduril getting more business as it means I can see even crazier submarine toys in Newport Harbor for Palmer. But doesn’t Palinitir and some other competitors make drones that would qualify?![]()
Trump Wants Border Surveillance Towers That Only Palmer Luckey Can Build
Sure looks like a handout for a Trump ally.gizmodo.com
Part of Donald Trump’s One Big, Beautiful Bill—the massive spending bill that will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans while gutting social services like Medicaid—calls for new surveillance towers for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use on the northern and southern borders. That’s pretty standard procedure, except for one catch that The Intercept picked up on: the description of the project basically only fits the work of Palmer Luckey’s Anduril Industries.
The provision in question calls for $6 billion to be spent on border security technologies, including a “virtual wall” of surveillance towers that can detect people crossing the border. The bill says the payday can only be awarded to a company whose products have been “tested and accepted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to deliver autonomous capabilities”—where “autonomous” is described as “a system designed to apply artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, or other algorithms to accurately detect, identify, classify, and track items of interest in real time such that the system can make operational adjustments without the active engagement of personnel or continuous human command or control.”
That pretty much exclusively describes the work of Anduril, which suddenly has an effective monopoly on the very lucrative surveillance tower business.
It also MASSIVELY increases the fee required for an asylum-seeker to appeal to the BIA from a negative decision by an immigration judge. The new fee would be too much for most American citizens, much less those who came here seeking asylum.Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Has A Nasty Surprise For World Cup Tourists
President Donald Trump’s marquee legislation includes steep increases to non-immigrant visa fees that kick in next year–just as the U.S. hopes to attract World Cup 2026 soccer supporters.
![]()
Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Has A Poison Pill For World Cup Tourists
Trump’s marquee legislative win in his second term includes a pricey fee for international tourists considering a World Cup trip next summer.www.forbes.com
Do you think its appropriate?The name is hilarious to me, and that’s without comment on any good or bad things within the bill.
finding it hilarious tells me alot about someone. I don’t understand how it could be seen as anything other than stupidDo you think its appropriate?
What, the name of the bill? Or the contents of the bill?Do you think its appropriate?
The name. You said you were not commenting on the contents.What, the name of the bill? Or the contents of the bill?
Yeah, I think it’s appropriate. What’s inappropriate about it?The name. You said you were not commenting on the contents.
It's fucking stupid. It trivializes governance to the level of kindergarten.Yeah, I think it’s appropriate. What’s inappropriate about it?
I see what you mean. I thought you were suggesting the name was offensive or something, that type of inappropriate.It's fucking stupid. It trivializes governance to the level of kindergarten.