Yes, and it's very confusing that nobody sees an issue with it, especially when it puts our troops in danger for more civilian attacks.
What troops are in danger from civilian attacks?
No need to pivot. The increasing of temperature is obvious and, among other things, the reason our military personnel would be put at higher risk. If they're committing war crimes and nobody is doing anything about it, someone needs to stop them, right?
Any that a civilian can get to.
The main issue is that sort of thing is necessary to protect them from Trump's political grandstanding and his willingness to use them for his own selfish purposes. Why don't you see the issue?
I don't read it that way at all. Someone "trying to stop them" violently would, itself, be an illegal action. The six are calling for a stop to violent illegal actions, not a perpetuation of them.
He is speculating. Which I think he said before is perfectly okay. Or the exact opposite. I don’t think it matters, though.
Yes. He's a triple threat. He's up there in hypocrisy and self delusion as well.
Yes, and we've seen an increase in political violence with two assassination attempts among them.
What violent, illegal actions? What judicial/legal body, which has the authority to do so, has determined that our troops are breaking any laws?
You aren’t alone. The people committing the crimes agree with you.Yes, and we've seen an increase in political violence with two assassination attempts among them.
What violent, illegal actions? What judicial/legal body, which has the authority to do so, has determined that our troops are breaking any laws?
The answer is no judicial body has done that, which is why it's irresponsible for Congress to make public statements implying that they are.
Clearly I'm alone on this, which is absolutely amazing.
I give up.
We've also seen an increase in coyotes in North Carolina but you're not on here whining about that, even though the causal relationship is roughly the same.
