donbosco
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 4,072
yepI put the over/under of the number of the "Federalist Papers" that the average NC state legislator has read at 1.5
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yepI put the over/under of the number of the "Federalist Papers" that the average NC state legislator has read at 1.5
I'll take the under on that easily.I put the over/under of the number of the "Federalist Papers" that the average NC state legislator has read at 1.5
It would never happen, but the revised version of The 1619 Project is really an extraordinary work of cultural history. 99% of the critique was of a few sentences in the initial version, which the authors have now addressed to ensure accuracy. I've read it three times now and I'm amazed by (1) the quality of the writing and analysis, and (2) the lack of overt partisanship. It's not a "foundational" work, of course, but people who buy into the demagoguery of it are really missing out.I have a hunch they just threw in MLK's Letter from a Birmingham Jail to avoid charges that it is focused otherwise entirely on white men. Not much diversity in those "Foundational" Documents, which is no doubt the point.
No doubt, but MAGA Republicans would probably rather die than allow the 1619 Project to be used in any educational institution they control, which includes every public school and university in NC.It would never happen, but the revised version of The 1619 Project is really an extraordinary work of cultural history. 99% of the critique was of a few sentences in the initial version, which the authors have now addressed to ensure accuracy. I've read it three times now and I'm amazed by (1) the quality of the writing and analysis, and (2) the lack of overt partisanship. It's not a "foundational" work, of course, but people who buy into the demagoguery of it are really missing out.
It would never happen, but the revised version of The 1619 Project is really an extraordinary work of cultural history. 99% of the critique was of a few sentences in the initial version, which the authors have now addressed to ensure accuracy. I've read it three times now and I'm amazed by (1) the quality of the writing and analysis, and (2) the lack of overt partisanship. It's not a "foundational" work, of course, but people who buy into the demagoguery of it are really missing out.
This seems to be a proposition many colleges are exploring. I noticed Vanderbilt is thinking about opening a campus in downtown San Francisco --UNC at Chapel Hill at Flint, Michigan
The first thing I noticed while scrolling through a batch of documents I got for a story about UNC-CH a couple months ago was the name “Prometheus Task Force,” which is just the kind of high-falutin title to catch my attention. Then I noticed some data about Kettering University—which I admit I had to Google—and the phrase “UNC School of Engineering — Kettering Campus of Automotive Excellence.”
Once I slowed down, I realized I was reading a proposal for UNC-CH to purchase an engineering school in Michigan and run it as a satellite campus. The plan emerged last spring as a way for UNC-CH to meet a proposal in the General Assembly that the university open an engineering school. Talks were serious enough that Chapel Hill officials were in touch with Kettering’s president, the documents show.
UNC-CH says the plan is dead now. But the fact that it was seriously considered speaks to the shifting economics of higher ed, as university officials try to develop programs that will meet workforce needs. And it offers a little insight into how UNC-CH officials are trying to avoid their new engineering school competing with N.C. State’s program.
![]()
The Quad: UNC at Chapel Hill at Flint, Michigan
The inside story of why UNC-Chapel Hill considered opening a campus in Michigan. Plus tenure attacks and job changes.www.theassemblync.com