UNC to cut 70 mill

So do the other 15 member University of North Carolina institutions implement this too?
If so, do each of the 15 member institutions need to follow the exact same plan?
Is this arbitrary and just to Chapel Hill?
If DOGE has to happen, let’s hope it transpires with a little common sense and not with a chainsaw.
 
chris I get it Athletics makes a lot of money-I practically worship the Rams Clubs -My point is the greater Univ nows gives athletics double digit millions "Institutional support" Athletics is not self sufficient any longer
Not a good look when we are cutting Academics
No actually football and basketball make a lot of money, and nothing else. I agree that student athletic fees are out of control. But i am not sure but think they are required to provide those fees to athletics if they charge them to students. See my edits above as i would like to research your institutional support number.
 
So do the other 15 member University of North Carolina institutions implement this too?
If so, do each of the 15 member institutions need to follow the exact same plan?
Is this arbitrary and just to Chapel Hill?
If DOGE has to happen, let’s hope it transpires with a little common sense and not with a chainsaw.
I think they do............BOG told them to...Now the exact same plan--probably not
 
Th rational is in large part old fashion competition It is harder than 40 hells to get accepted out of State. These are unreal good students . We want to attract them-and that requires Financial aid to be competitive for a lot of them
We are clinging for now to a top 5 public university ranking , but UVA and Michigan rank ahead of us and accept 30% of out of state students.

UNC is one of the very few gems that keep us from sinking into Alabama and Mississippi terrtory.

Why in the world would our state legislature not do everything to promote our priceless gem ? and yes, that is a rhetorical question
 

Chatgpt​


Institutional Support & Student Fees (2023–24)​

Institutional Support​

  • UNC–Chapel Hill provided approximately $21.4 million in institutional support to athletics during FY 2023–24. This includes direct payments, services, debt coverage, and rental charges, as detailed in the university’s annual NCAA financial report 247Sports+9The Assembly NC+9Sports Business Journal+9.
  • Of that total, reporting suggests about $5 million came via direct institutional support (e.g. transfers of cash) and another $1.8 million through indirect services—such as facility usage, finance, or administrative support Sports Business Journal.

Student Fees​


📊 Summary Table​

CategoryFY 2023–24 Amount
Institutional Support (total)$21.4 million
 • Direct transfers~$5 million
 • Indirect/payments & services~$1.8 million
Student Athletic Fees> $8 million
 

Chatgpt​


Institutional Support & Student Fees (2023–24)​

Institutional Support​

  • UNC–Chapel Hill provided approximately $21.4 million in institutional support to athletics during FY 2023–24. This includes direct payments, services, debt coverage, and rental charges, as detailed in the university’s annual NCAA financial report 247Sports+9The Assembly NC+9Sports Business Journal+9.
  • Of that total, reporting suggests about $5 million came via direct institutional support (e.g. transfers of cash) and another $1.8 million through indirect services—such as facility usage, finance, or administrative support Sports Business Journal.

Student Fees​


📊 Summary Table​

CategoryFY 2023–24 Amount
Institutional Support (total)$21.4 million
 • Direct transfers~$5 million
 • Indirect/payments & services~$1.8 million
Student Athletic Fees> $8 million
Thanks
 
2% of the total budget? I suspect this will be the first of several. I would wager these are the easy cuts. Less catering, more disciplined procurement, not backfilling administrative positions when people retire or quit.

And I honestly think it's a good thing. We've got kids coming up going to school and we can certainly afford in state tuition but our kids have plenty of friends who are going to go into deep debt. If we're going to start bending that cost curve down, we've got to make some cuts and administration is a pretty fat target at some of these universities.

The fear was this Lee Roberts guy was going to come in cutting DOGE style but he's been in the job for a while. There's a fair chance they did the work to identify where the low-hanging fruit is.
 
2% of the total budget? I suspect this will be the first of several. I would wager these are the easy cuts. Less catering, more disciplined procurement, not backfilling administrative positions when people retire or quit.

And I honestly think it's a good thing. We've got kids coming up going to school and we can certainly afford in state tuition but our kids have plenty of friends who are going to go into deep debt. If we're going to start bending that cost curve down, we've got to make some cuts and administration is a pretty fat target at some of these universities.

The fear was this Lee Roberts guy was going to come in cutting DOGE style but he's been in the job for a while. There's a fair chance they did the work to identify where the low-hanging fruit is.
Yeah. Really the only thing that stands out to me is cutting the financial aid allotment for out-of-state students from 44% to 18%. That’s a significant cut, IMO. And while I definitely understand the argument that financial aid funding priority should be for the children of North Carolina taxpayers, I do think that slashing OOS aid by so much will have a sizable impact on UNC’s ability to recruit and retain the best and brightest out of state students, many of whom use aid offerings to be able to chose UNC over some of our more affluent peers, but who still also generally end up having to pay more out of pocket than their in-state counterparts. One of the primary shortcomings of UNC in comparison to our closest public peers UVA and Michigan is that we are already hampered by the 18% legislative cap on out of state student enrollment- it’s almost double that at both Virginia and Michigan- and therefore we collect far less tuition revenue such that we are then so much more heavily reliant upon things like federal funding and private philanthropy. My concern with having *too* much of a “UNC for North Carolinians” mentality is that we can very quickly find ourselves outside of that coveted “top 5 public school” and “top 3 best value” really quickly.
 
And every program ending in the word: STUDIES.
Yep. If I were a professor in Cultural Studies, Gender Studies, Women's Studies, African-American Studies, etc. at any UNC system university I'd be very worried about my job right now. And even more so if you work at a public university in more solidly red states. There are whole academic programs created since the Sixties that are likely going to become a lot more rare (outside of blue states) in academia, and nearly all of those programs were designed to foster greater diversity of thought and representation at universities and colleges. Which is exactly the opposite of what our current political overlords want.
 

UNC Leaders Propose An Estimated $70 Million in Budget Cuts Amid Federal Financial Crunch​

Posted by Brighton McConnell | Jul 30, 2025 | Higher Education, UNC

Facing funding cuts from both the state and federal governments, UNC administrators shared some broad areas it aims to trim roughly $70 million from its operating budget on Wednesday — including consolidating jobs and scaling back financial aid to out-of-state students.

Ahead of a budget presentation to the Board of Trustees’ Budget, Finance and Infrastructure Committee, Chancellor Lee Roberts, Vice Chancellor of Finance and Operations Nate Knuffman and Interim Provost James W. Dean, Jr shared a letter to the campus community detailing the “steps to identify operational savings.” It is one of the first major financial changes proposed by the Chapel Hill school amid a financial crunch caused in part by President Donald Trump’s administration cutting research funding and other financial support to higher education institutions.

“Our leadership team is taking a thoughtful and targeted approach,” reads the letter, “looking into areas that can be streamlined for greater efficiency, strengthening our operations while meeting our fiduciary responsibility to the people of North Carolina. We have identified savings of approximately $70 million (about 2% of our total operational budget), and including up to $29.5 million in savings this fiscal year. Each of these decisions comes with true costs, yet we believe that this measured approach will enable us to continue to pursue our goal of becoming the best public university in the country.”

The bulk of the cuts would not be implemented until Fiscal Year 2027, according to Knuffman during his presentation to the trustees, with many having a multi-year phase out — although nearly $30 million in savings could be achieved in the upcoming fiscal year.

The letter categorized three areas it aims to make the cuts, with the most being “Organizational Effectiveness” with approximately $38 million set to be cut. The university was already asking leaders from departments like Carolina Athletics, its graduate school, the Center for Student Success and the North Carolina Collaboratory — which helps connect scientific researchers and their data to local governments in North Carolina — to find ways to trim their expenditures. But Wednesday’s presentation also said UNC will be looking to eliminate 20% of its vacant roles and associated costs, as well as consolidating roles and resources across its human resources, IT, finance, communications and research administration workforce.

In his presentation, Knuffman clarified those consolidations and staff reductions are part of $8.5 million identified in UNC’s administrative roles, which are part of the university’s new “ServiceFirst” strategic initiative.

“Administrative spending has been an increased area of focus for the system office and many others,” said the vice chancellor for finance. “This is really our opportunity to direct administrative savings to campus.

unc-budget-cuts-presentation-chart-073025-bot-meeting.jpg

The other two broad areas are categorized as “Academic Prioritization” and “North Carolinians First,” with the latter targeting $17 million in savings and the former aiming for $14 million. The prioritization of enrollment for North Carolina residents means the university will decrease its financial aid for future out-of-state students from 44% of total cost of attendance to 18% — which the administrators said aligns with the limits for non-resident enrollment mandated by the UNC System Board of Governors. The operational cuts do not affect the Carolina Covenant program or “many of our other scholarship programs,” according to the letter.

Roberts, Knuffman and White’s message also said UNC’s centers and institutes are examining ways to improve their operational efficiency while also being “more rigorous” in the evaluation of academic programs with low enrollment or waning interest. The ELEVATE program, which offers development awards, hiring support and resources to UNC faculty of all rank and tracks, will also be phased out and cut after Fiscal Year 2031.

“I think it’s important to note the national context,” Knuffman said when introducing the proposed changes to the trustees. “This type of budget-saving efforts are happening all over higher ed. This is similar in scope to some, it’s actually smaller in scope [compared] to many. We believe it is a measured, strategic approach and it is designed to really protect our longer-term missions of and commitment to North Carolina.”

Wednesday’s letter to the campus community said Roberts’ administration is “committed to transparency and regular communication throughout this process,” which they say includes shared governance with academic leaders and the establishment of a Chancellor’s Forum series to answer questions.

“We recognize that it is not easy to receive this kind of news,” wrote Roberts, Knuffman and White. “These are difficult choices and there are many different opinions on what is mission-critical and what is not. Behind every budget decision are real people who feel the impact in deeply personal ways, which is why we are working hard to find savings in as many areas as possible before a reduction in staffing. We appreciate your patience and feedback as we work across this complex organization to identify greater detail.”

 
Back
Top