—> US Sends More Immigrants to Salvadoran Prison | SCOTUS vs POTUS

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 23K
  • Politics 

Inside the Urgent Fight Over the Trump Administration’s New Deportation Effort​

The push to deport a group of Venezuelans raises questions about whether the government is following a Supreme Court order requiring that migrants receive due process.

🎁 🔗 —> Inside the Urgent Fight Over the Trump Administration’s New Deportation Effort

“… The lack of clear information from the government about the latest deportation operation raised new questions about whether the Trump administration was trying to sidestep the Supreme Court’s previous decision, which called for any migrant removed under the wartime law to have a chance to challenge their removal.

… The group, which has sought to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act in cases across the country, raced to file a lawsuit on Wednesday in Federal District Court in Abilene, Texas, on behalf of two Venezuelans at the detention center.

Lawyers for the Justice Department responded by telling Judge James Wesley Hendrix — “unequivocally,” he later wrote — that the administration had no plans to deport the men.

Judge Hendrix declined to issue an order on Thursday shielding them from being removed. He also said he was not yet prepared to grant the A.C.L.U.’s request to extend protections to all the other Venezuelan migrants being held in Anson.

That evening, the A.C.L.U. received multiple calls that the notices were being handed out to immigrants at the facility, where migrants had been sent from across the country in recent days, according to Mr. Gelernt.

Last week, a judge in the Southern District of Texas had issued an order blocking the government from using the wartime power to deport people. But the Bluebonnet facility lies under the authority of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, where no such order is in effect.

The A.C.L.U. lawyers said they had emailed the government on Thursday at 6:23 p.m. Central asking whether the government had distributed notices to Venezuelans at the facility, according to a court filing from the group.

Thirteen minutes later, they said, government lawyers told them they would circle back with more information.

Instead, when Justice Department lawyers replied more than an hour later, they said only that the two migrants the A.C.L.U. was representing in court in Texas had not been given notices.

Frustrated, the A.C.L.U., responded that it was inquiring about the status of all migrants in the facility.

More than two hours later, at 8:41 p.m., the government wrote, “We are not in a position at this time to share information about unknown detainees who are not currently parties to the pending litigation.”

Inside the Bluebonnet Detention Facility, migrants were scrambling, calling their family members and warning them that it appeared the government was planning to deport them immediately. …”

[Migrants started receiving notices that they were being accused of being gang members and would be deported overnight]

 

Inside the Urgent Fight Over the Trump Administration’s New Deportation Effort​

The push to deport a group of Venezuelans raises questions about whether the government is following a Supreme Court order requiring that migrants receive due process.

🎁 🔗 —> Inside the Urgent Fight Over the Trump Administration’s New Deportation Effort

“… The lack of clear information from the government about the latest deportation operation raised new questions about whether the Trump administration was trying to sidestep the Supreme Court’s previous decision, which called for any migrant removed under the wartime law to have a chance to challenge their removal.

… The group, which has sought to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act in cases across the country, raced to file a lawsuit on Wednesday in Federal District Court in Abilene, Texas, on behalf of two Venezuelans at the detention center.

Lawyers for the Justice Department responded by telling Judge James Wesley Hendrix — “unequivocally,” he later wrote — that the administration had no plans to deport the men.

Judge Hendrix declined to issue an order on Thursday shielding them from being removed. He also said he was not yet prepared to grant the A.C.L.U.’s request to extend protections to all the other Venezuelan migrants being held in Anson.

That evening, the A.C.L.U. received multiple calls that the notices were being handed out to immigrants at the facility, where migrants had been sent from across the country in recent days, according to Mr. Gelernt.

Last week, a judge in the Southern District of Texas had issued an order blocking the government from using the wartime power to deport people. But the Bluebonnet facility lies under the authority of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, where no such order is in effect.

The A.C.L.U. lawyers said they had emailed the government on Thursday at 6:23 p.m. Central asking whether the government had distributed notices to Venezuelans at the facility, according to a court filing from the group.

Thirteen minutes later, they said, government lawyers told them they would circle back with more information.

Instead, when Justice Department lawyers replied more than an hour later, they said only that the two migrants the A.C.L.U. was representing in court in Texas had not been given notices.

Frustrated, the A.C.L.U., responded that it was inquiring about the status of all migrants in the facility.

More than two hours later, at 8:41 p.m., the government wrote, “We are not in a position at this time to share information about unknown detainees who are not currently parties to the pending litigation.”

Inside the Bluebonnet Detention Facility, migrants were scrambling, calling their family members and warning them that it appeared the government was planning to deport them immediately. …”

[Migrants started receiving notices that they were being accused of being gang members and would be deported overnight]


“…
The lawyers were so concerned time was running short that they took the extraordinary step of giving the judge a 1:30 p.m. deadline to respond. After that, they went over his head to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans.

The Fifth Circuit was not the only court they tried.

By Friday afternoon, the A.C.L.U. had also asked for help from the Supreme Court and from Judge James E. Boasberg in Federal District Court in Washington, who had issued the first order pausing deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. …”

Boasberg said he was concerned but had been directed by SCOTUS that he didn’t have jurisdiction over detainees in Texas, so could not issue a protective stay in the case. But SCOTUS acted overnight at about 1 am.
 
some reminders on Easter Sunday for Silence Dipshit and the other disgusting ghouls on this board......

Matthew 25:31-46:
The "Great Judgment." Nations will be separated based on their actions toward the "least of these" (the poor, sick, hungry, etc.). Jesus states that doing good to them is equivalent to doing good to him. Jesus's followers should be concerned with the needs of all people, regardless of their status or origin.

Leviticus 19:33-34:
"You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself".

Deuteronomy 10:17-19:
"For you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were once foreigners in Egypt".
 

Projection, the answer is always projection with these people. It's not the courts who are threatening our democracy, it's Donald Trump and his fucking cult that believe they are above the law. Trump is himself a convicted felon and far too many of those around him have been accused of committing some pretty serious crimes, including sexual assault. We know that Dear Leader's administration has already arrested and detained at least one actual American citizen, if they're allowed to get away with these deportations without due process how long will it be before they're rounding up and deporting actual US citizens without due process? Or just arresting his critics and either detaining or even imprisoning them here in the USA - maybe in Trump's Louisiana gulag? Only a matter of time, almost certainly.
 

Silence ? seriously ?

Trump won the popular vote by 1.5% with a margin of votes less than Hillary and Biden

and Trump won, not because of concern about brown hordes invading our country, but because of the price of eggs which are now at an all time high at a bit over $6/dozen and 20 % higher than when Trump took office
 
Projection, the answer is always projection with these people. It's not the courts who are threatening our democracy, it's Donald Trump and his fucking cult that believe they are above the law. Trump is himself a convicted felon and far too many of those around him have been accused of committing some pretty serious crimes, including sexual assault. We know that Dear Leader's administration has already arrested and detained at least one actual American citizen, if they're allowed to get away with these deportations without due process how long will it be before they're rounding up and deporting actual US citizens without due process? Or just arresting his critics and either detaining or even imprisoning them here in the USA - maybe in Trump's Louisiana gulag? Only a matter of time, almost certainly.
Right. The implication of this, even if he were right about the numbers, which he is not, is that a presidential candidate could campaign on ANYTHING, and if he’s elected, that thing would be de facto constitutional. So in 2028, if AOC campaigns on imposing martial law in every state that once supported the Confederacy and refusing to allow citizens of those states to vote in any subsequent elections, and if she then won, Rogan O’Handley and Silence would have to insist SCOTUS sign off on the constitutionality of that policy.

Or at least Rogan would. I don’t think Muscovites like Silence get a say in this. Yet.
 
Back
Top