—> US Sends More Immigrants to Salvadoran Prison | SCOTUS vs POTUS

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 27K
  • Politics 
Why wasn't the law enforced coming into the country? Now we're all law experts with deportation. Deportation is the winning side here. Choose wisely
Are you asking me whether laws should be followed and enforced? My answer is yes.

What's your answer? Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
 
Are you asking me whether laws should be followed and enforced? My answer is yes.

What's your answer? Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
Where were you when they weren't being enforced with illegally entry with the help of Biden and his cohorts?
 
Where were you when they weren't being enforced with illegally entry with the help of Biden and his cohorts?
I was doing my job forcing the government to follow the law in my area of specialty, which is not immigration.

So, back to my question. Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
 
I was doing my job forcing the government to follow the law in my area of specialty, which is not immigration.

So, back to my question. Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
Lol ok. Yes, but I'm for deportation of those that came into the country illegally immediately. We don't have the time and resources to play your game with overwhelming the system. I notice due process only works for you when leaving the country, how convenient.
 
Lol ok. Yes, but I'm for deportation of those that came into the country illegally immediately. We don't have the time and resources to play your game with overwhelming the system. I notice due process only works for you when leaving the country, how convenient.
Your "Yes" is immediately followed by your explanation of why you really mean "No." There is no "but it might be expensive and time consuming" exception to the 14th amendment.

I've got no clue what your last sentence means. I think you were trying to suggest I only care about due process in certain situations?? If selective due process is bad, why are you advocating for selective due process? I'm for due process in every instance it is owed.
 
Your "Yes" is immediately followed by your explanation of why you really mean "No." There is no "but it might be expensive and time consuming" exception to the 14th amendment.

I've got no clue what your last sentence means. I think you were trying to suggest I only care about due process in certain situations?? If selective due process is bad, why are you advocating for selective due process? I'm for due process in every instance it is owed.
Prove to me you were for due process coming into the country illegally.
 
You're not making any valid points. Just shows you favor illegal immigration more than legal immigration.
Sort of. I favor Tren de Aragua, not the rest of those illegals. And don't play coy here, Silence. You and Stevie M. do, too. You were both showing me your tattoos at our meeting this past Monday.
 
Do you mean prove I'm for people entering the country legally? What is "due process coming into the country illegally?" And how would you suggest I prove that?
On this message board. Show where you were against illegal entry. Google says due process means following established legal rules and principles to ensure a fair and impartial outcome. So what legal rules were followed during the illegal entry?
 
On this message board. Show where you were against illegal entry. Google says due process means following established legal rules and principles to ensure a fair and impartial outcome. So what legal rules were followed during the illegal entry?
This is going to fucking blow your mind, my Russian friend. We have these things called statutes here. They actually have the FORCE OF LAW!!! Can you believe it? It's not all about what our dictator du jour says!

 
On this message board. Show where you were against illegal entry. Google says due process means following established legal rules and principles to ensure a fair and impartial outcome. So what legal rules were followed during the illegal entry?
Lol. Thanks for googling due process. You're getting warmer, so keep it up.

Your question is silly. What legal rules were followed during an illegal act? Uh, not many, hence the illegality.

It may also surprise you that I've not reduced every thought or belief I've ever had to writing on this message board. But if you want proof on this message board where I'm against illegal entry, here you go:

Are you asking me whether laws should be followed and enforced? My answer is yes.

What's your answer? Do you think laws, including the due process clause of the Constitution, should be followed and enforced?
 
Keep burying your head in the sand. We have news stories of the crimes. Regardless of what skewed numbers your using you don't add to crime by saying its only a lesser type of crime, thats assisine. Separating the groups does no good, crime is crime. We can't get rid of the crime here per se, but we sure don't need to add to it. Plus alot of crime is underreported with illegals, from fear of deportations.
So given your assertion that "crime is crime" shouldn't we be deporting more American citizens who commit more crimes than do undocumented immigrants ?

and a whole bunch of American citizen crime is "underreported"

Just trying to understand your tortured logic here...
 
So given your assertion that "crime is crime" shouldn't we be deporting more American citizens who commit more crimes than do undocumented immigrants ?

and a whole bunch of American citizen crime is "underreported"

Just trying to understand your tortured logic here...
Why have no vetting and bring in any type of crime if crime is already a problem. Basic common sense. You want to fight crime by adding to it, dumb. We can't deport citizens, more common sense. You're defending the indefensible. So maybe solve our issues and not bring anymore of it in, I know its complicated for you
 
Lol. Thanks for googling due process. You're getting warmer, so keep it up.

Your question is silly. What legal rules were followed during an illegal act? Uh, not many, hence the illegality.

It may also surprise you that I've not reduced every thought or belief I've ever had to writing on this message board. But if you want proof on this message board where I'm against illegal entry, here you go:
Right, how convenient the laws were already broken and now pretending to take the high road and want to be the defender of all things law abiding. Fraud.
 
Back
Top