—> US Sends More Immigrants to Salvadoran Prison | SCOTUS vs POTUS

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 37K
  • Politics 
lawtig02 said:
Wait, a supposed member of the Sinaloa cartel, which has probably trafficked more fentanyl into the US than any other country or organization, is praising Trump and indicating he thinks the same way his cartel does, and you’re suggesting that’s a GOOD thing for MAGA???
Click to expand...
I assumed when he said "everything is backfiring at this point" he meant it was backfiring on Trump. He thinks this is good for Trump? Also according to the tweet SD posted, it's the "Sinola" cartel.
 
lawtig02 said:
Wait, a supposed member of the Sinaloa cartel, which has probably trafficked more fentanyl into the US than any other country or organization, is praising Trump and indicating he thinks the same way his cartel does, and you’re suggesting that’s a GOOD thing for MAGA???
Click to expand...
Wait are you saying we should have secured borders so fentanyl can't enter the country so easily? Lol you walked right into that one.
I'm saying CNN tried to get a cartel member to bash Trump and imply Trumps actions are causing cartels to retaliate but that wasn't the case.
 
Silence Dogood said:
Wait are you saying we should have secured borders so fentanyl can't enter the country so easily? Lol you walked right into that one.
I'm saying CNN tried to get a cartel member to bash Trump and imply Trumps actions are causing cartels to retaliate but that wasn't the case.
Click to expand...
Because he knows, as we’ve been telling you morons for years now, that keeping migrants in Mexico is the best Christmas gift ever for his and other drug and human-trafficking cartels. Good lord, man. I know nobody’s trying to immigrate into Russia so you may not have personal knowledge of this, but use a couple of the brain cells God gave you from time to time.
 
lawtig02 said:
Because he knows, as we’ve been telling you morons for years now, that keeping migrants in Mexico is the best Christmas gift ever for his and other drug and human-trafficking cartels. Good lord, man. I know nobody’s trying to immigrate into Russia so you may not have personal knowledge of this, but use a couple of the brain cells God gave you from time to time.
Click to expand...
Lol, yeah, because if we allow alot of Mexicans in, the cartels won't be able to function. Delusional!
But at least you came around to admitting there's crime at the border, knew I'd get you to admit it!
 

Mexican president declines Trump's offer of US troops to help fight drug cartels​

Claudia Sheinbaum rejects US military assistance amid cartel crisis​

Mexican president rejects Trump's offer of U.S. troops to combat drug cartels | Fox News

President Donald Trump offered U.S. military assistance to address cartels in Mexico, but Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum recently announced that she declined the offer.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Saw this headline while at the gym. Can see why Fox News viewers spout the stuff that they do. Granted they do slide in the article what Claudia Sceinbaum is rejecting: US troops in Mexico. She states Mexico and the US can work together but she stops at having US troops on Mexico soil. But the headline and even the blurb under the headline makes it sound like Mexico does not want to help at all which is complete 🐂💩
 
ZenMode said:
I've seen this brought up multiple times recently. How is it that Obama was able to apparently deport so many without a hearing, but Trump has to invoke the AEA to do something similar?

www.snopes.com

US deported more than 3M people during Obama presidency. Most did not have chance to plead case in court

Social media posts claimed "75–83%" of people deported during the Obama administration "never saw a judge or had a chance to plead their case."
www.snopes.com www.snopes.com
Click to expand...
Because those people did not claim asylum, and hence, they were eligible for expedited return. When immigrants claim asylum, or other judicial protection (like no return to a specific country) they are entitled to a hearing.
 
Calheel said:
Because those people did not claim asylum, and hence, they were eligible for expedited return. When immigrants claim asylum, or other judicial protection (like no return to a specific country) they are entitled to a hearing.
Click to expand...
This. Also:

1. Anyone caught within 100 miles of the border, having been in the US without documentation for less than 14 days, can be summarily removed. Every presidential administration does this.

2. There are also stipulated removals, which Trump calls self-deportation. These are agreements where the migrant agrees to leave in lieu of enforcement proceedings. There's no hearing, but that's only because the defendant is entering something akin to a guilty plea. Again, all administrations do this.

3. Obama didn't deny due process to anyone. Thus could their cases be heard by ALJs and though they can be appealed to an Article III court, that process is lengthy and most migrants don't try it. It's also expensive.

BUT once the president denies the process that is due, now the migrant has a claim for habeus corpus. That has to go to a federal district court. So it's Trump who created the conditions by which the Article III courts had to get involved.

If Trump just did things they way they're supposed to be done according to the law, how they have been done for decades, then we wouldn't have this "due process" problem. Trump, as usual, has accomplished nothing with his thuggery and in fact it has backfired. He is less able to deport, and it will cost more, because he tried to do it on the cheap. Which is basically the story of Trump's whole life.
 
Calheel said:
Because those people did not claim asylum, and hence, they were eligible for expedited return. When immigrants claim asylum, or other judicial protection (like no return to a specific country) they are entitled to a hearing.
Click to expand...
You would think that anyone here illegally would use asylum as a tool to not be deported.
 
ZenMode said:
You would think that anyone here illegally would use asylum as a tool to not be deported.
Click to expand...
1. Asylum has to be claimed when entering the US IIRC
2. The applicant for asylum has to prove a credible fear of persecution. That's a fairly low bar but not impossibly low. Plenty of would-be migrants do not establish credible fear. Without credible fear, the asylum can be denied on the spot and that counts as process.
 
ZenMode said:
You would think that anyone here illegally would use asylum as a tool to not be deported.
Click to expand...
Now you are starting to catch on.

The excessive use of asylum started late Obama and continued through Trump and Biden (leading to the “remain in Mexico” idea). That is why Biden tried to get the reform package through Congress last year to make it easier and faster to process asylum claims.

Biden wasn’t just letting in immigrants for the heck of it. He was hamstrung by a law that said he had to - and unlike Trump, Biden tries to follow the law.

There is no simple solution to excessive asylum claims. The immigrants have Facebook and know the exact lines they need to say when they get to the border. So the system clearly needs reform.
 
superrific said:
1. Asylum has to be claimed when entering the US IIRC
Click to expand...

Within the first year, but you can request an exception.
superrific said:
2. The applicant for asylum has to prove a credible fear of persecution. That's a fairly low bar but not impossibly low. Plenty of would-be migrants do not establish credible fear. Without credible fear, the asylum can be denied on the spot and that counts as process.
Click to expand...
As far as I know,
superrific said:
1. Asylum has to be claimed when entering the US IIRC
Click to expand...
You have up to a year to claim asylum. That is ridiculous on its face.
 
Calheel said:
Now you are starting to catch on.

The excessive use of asylum started late Obama and continued through Trump and Biden (leading to the “remain in Mexico” idea). That is why Biden tried to get the reform package through Congress last year to make it easier and faster to process asylum claims.

Biden wasn’t just letting in immigrants for the heck of it. He was hamstrung by a law that said he had to - and unlike Trump, Biden tries to follow the law.

There is no simple solution to excessive asylum claims. The immigrants have Facebook and know the exact lines they need to say when they get to the border. So the system clearly needs reform.
Click to expand...
There are some obvious issues. The fact that you can sneak into the country and wait for up to a year to claim asylum is just crazy and clearly just a tool to be set free to continue trying to hide and avoid being deported. It should be a requirement to claim asylum at a port of entry before you enter the country.
 
ZenMode said:
There are some obvious issues. The fact that you can sneak into the country and wait for up to a year to claim asylum is just crazy and clearly just a tool to be set free to continue trying to hide and avoid being deported. It should be a requirement to claim asylum at a port of entry before you enter the country.
Click to expand...

This idea has bipartisan support. In fact, a bipartisan bill was about to be passed last Spring which, I believe, codified something similar when Trump and his minions derailed it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top