We, the Hivemind Examine Vince Gilligan's "Plur1bus"

  • Thread starter Thread starter an0maly
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 64
  • Views: 1K
  • Off-Topic 
I am glad lots of folks seemed to enjoy the show. I read this thread, a couple of online articles, and a couple of Reddit threads and it seems my understanding of the themes in the show are consistent with others’ and the commentary from those in the production. I do not understand the love for the show.
I am highly sympathetic to your view (S1-7 was weak, as I wrote above), even though with the the next one, and the finale I really do like it. As I say, it is quite a bizarre notion for a TV show, and I guess this points back to the fact that Gilligan was massively inspired by Rod Serling's The Twilight Zone. Some of the episodes of that show remain --60 years later-- some of the finest television that has ever been done. I think Gilligan is trying something as new as that was in 1960, but time will tell if it comes close to anything like that.
I want to like it. I even rewatched a few parts of a couple of episodes to try to appreciate moments that lots of viewers found interesting and profound. None of it moved the needle for me. I think the show has too much “The Fly” episode and not enough meat on the bone. By the third episode I was doing the 5 sec fast forward through dozens of on going walk abouts and lengthy Carol scowls.
When I rewatch I will probably surf though all her walking, driving, and being on the couch drunk scenes as well. This is flat out Gilligan's style, he will not stop it.

I really liked “The Fly” but it was a one off and unexpected. Very little in this show has left me surprised, awed, or pointedly curious which are reasons I enjoy sci fi.
There are actually great metaphorical ideas here, especially about A I, but too many things so far are unexplained, and we don't know what to think. Possibly intended to this point.
I also struggle with Rhea Seehorn. I am apparently in a huge minority here but she does not convey convincing depth to me. I look at her filmography and it aligns with my opinion of her as an actor including what I thought was one of the weakest links in Better Call Saul.
Rhea Seehorn has been given a really tough acting task so far, generally going in a range from annoyed, to snide, to raging angry. I think she is doing really well, but this character is intentionally just someone hard to like.
 
Why didn't Carol demand they destroy the eggs?
Case of horse out, too late to close the barn door. Before Helen died, she was joined to the hivemind, so it knew about the eggs right then, and given their goal to "fix it" with Carol, probably went after them as soon as possible. Carol only realized this in horror in the conversation at the ski lodge, partly realized from the hivemind knowing about the sensor in the liquor cabinet.
 
An interesting point that we probably all share.

Me personally, I get a lot from the things I read, in addition to the show.

But I get it, I've found myself in that boat recently with a movie that was being discussed on the movie thread. I tried to watch but gave up half way, it just wasn't my cup of tea. I have so much respect for the knowledge of our resident film critics that I find myself questioning why they like it and I don't. But ultimately it's just personal taste.

My wife and kids wouldn't finish one episode of Pluribus, I'm sure.

Our Vin diagrams have small intersections.
It's interesting, the extreme variance of what TV shows can do, from something as simple as possible (say The Brady Bunch) to something as complex as possible (like DEVS, or Dark, the German show from 2017-20). I loved both of those, the former staggeringly brilliant, but in no way are they for average viewers. I do think Pluribus is supposed to reach a far bigger and more diverse audience, but it is a tough go so far, at least, for some. I guess it is the biggest hit ever for Apple. So it's doing something right so far.
 
I would think a decent human would wonder what the current state of that person is and that should limit their ability to just use their bodies for his pleasure.
I also clarification that I wasn't only referring to sex. What about the ski trip, is it ok to have them fly my to the Alps for a week of skiing?

Plus as mentioned, I don't believe these are the actual people trapped in their bodies, they are changed.
 
It's interesting, the extreme variance of what TV shows can do, from something as simple as possible (say The Brady Bunch) to something as complex as possible (like DEVS, or Dark, the German show from 2017-20). I loved both of those, the former staggeringly brilliant, but in no way are they for average viewers. I do think Pluribus is supposed to reach a far bigger and more diverse audience, but it is a tough go so far, at least, for some. I guess it is the biggest hit ever for Apple. So it's doing something right so far.
I really liked Dark, but it seemed to move a little faster and, I believe, have more clues as to what was happening.
 
Back
Top