aGDevil2k
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,383
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, no. You'd see the same thing at 538. It means that there's a much bigger chance of a Kamala blowout than a Trump one.Ummm
Make it make sense. Looks to me like his model is broken
You would think if you have the best chance to win you would actually end up with the most electoral votesNo, no. You'd see the same thing at 538. It means that there's a much bigger chance of a Kamala blowout than a Trump one.
In the 538 simulation, 1 out of 1000 times, Trump wins with 447 EV, once at 399 and 2 at 382. Meanwhile, there are 20 simulations that give Kamala 400 EVs. It's probably because TX and FL are more in reach for Kamala than NY or CA are for Trump.
Basketball player 1: scores in three consecutive games 14 14 16You would think if you have the best chance to win you would actually end up with the most electoral votes
Also it might as well be 50/50Basketball player 1: scores in three consecutive games 14 14 16
Basketball player 2: scores in three consecutive games 10 12 27
If we define "winning" as scoring more points than the other player in a game, Player 1 wins twice (14>10, 14>12).
But 2 averages more points per game.
This seems to be the most positive news in this thread, no? Even in battleground states young people overall prefer Harris. Unless the rest all no-show on election day...
I doubt it.She's winning NC