2024 Presidential Election | ELECTION DAY 2024

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 8K
  • Views: 298K
  • Politics 
heelslegup said:
Click to expand...

This may be supremely significant.

If we assume that debate viewership was roughly representative of the voting public at large (a big assumption admittedly, but I also don't know of a reason why it would be majorly distorted), then a 70-30 split (i.e. a 40 point swing) means that a chunk of his hardcore base (the 35%) has broken away on the reproductive freedom issue.

5% / 35% = 0.143 That would seem to indicate that 14.3% OF HIS MOST HARDCORE BASE agree more with Kamala on Reproductive Freedoms that with Trump. Let that sink in.
 
Ddseddse said:
This may be supremely significant.

If we assume that debate viewership was roughly representative of the voting public at large (a big assumption admittedly, but I also don't know of a reason why it would be majorly distorted), then a 70-30 split (i.e. a 40 point swing) means that a chunk of his hardcore base (the 35%) has broken away on the reproductive freedom issue.

5% / 35% = 0.143 That would seem to indicate that 14.3% OF HIS MOST HARDCORE BASE agree more with Kamala on Reproductive Freedoms that with Trump. Let that sink in.
Click to expand...
The 40 point difference was with undecided voters only, not the hardcore base.
 
altmin said:
she's a power chaser with absolutely no principles; she just managed to fool a small percentage of Republicans that she had decency compared to Trump. She doesn't - she just dresses it up better.
Click to expand...
Nimarata has always been a feather in the wind who is always chasing that vein of pyrite. I witnessed her transactional moral ambiguity up close and personal during her stint as governor of the god-forsaken hellhole I call home. Now the nation can revel in discovering what a squishy jellyfish she's always been.
 
superrific said:
I hope not, because the Empire State Building is considerably taller than anything he owns.
Click to expand...

President Trump's habit of exaggerating or misrepresenting the effects of New York City's worst terrorist attack on him personally began the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001.

As our Timothy Bella reported Tuesday, Trump was asked by New Jersey station WWOR to weigh in on the import of the attacks on the World Trade Center only a few hours after planes struck its twin towers. One of the station's reporters asked Trump whether a building he owned — 40 Wall Street, a few blocks from the site of the attacks — had suffered any damage.

"40 Wall Street actually was the second-tallest building in downtown Manhattan,” Trump replied, “and it was actually, before the World Trade Center, was the tallest — and then, when they built the World Trade Center, it became known as the second tallest. And now it’s the tallest."
 
Ddseddse said:
This may be supremely significant.

If we assume that debate viewership was roughly representative of the voting public at large (a big assumption admittedly, but I also don't know of a reason why it would be majorly distorted), then a 70-30 split (i.e. a 40 point swing) means that a chunk of his hardcore base (the 35%) has broken away on the reproductive freedom issue.

5% / 35% = 0.143 That would seem to indicate that 14.3% OF HIS MOST HARDCORE BASE agree more with Kamala on Reproductive Freedoms that with Trump. Let that sink in.
Click to expand...
quite a few women who i'm "friends" with on instagram and who i believe voted for trump in the past liked that taylor swift post.

losing a bunch of those types of women should really be game/set/match.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top