2026 Midterm Elections

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 102K
  • Politics 
Collins may have won comfortably in the past, but I think things are different this year, and the anti-Trump mood is even stronger than it was in Trump's last midterm election in 2018. Having said that, I tend to agree that Platner can beat her, and perhaps by a comfortable margin, but that Mills would be 50/50 at best and likely would lose to Collins. People in both parties clearly seem to be favoring anti-establishment outsiders, which Platner certainly is, while Mills will be easily portrayed by Republicans as just another aging, bland, establishment-backed Democrat who will bring more of the same 'ol, same 'ol to DC politics- she seems like the Cheri Beasley of Maine Democratic politics. A nice lady but boring and a status quo candidate in a definitely anti-status quo time. Maybe that's not fair, but that's how MAGAs will message it and they're very good at that sort of thing.
Despite winning the popular vote by 8.6%, her 51% share of the vote was her worst performance since her first election in 1996 and was a 17-point drop from 2014. Maine was the only state to elect a senator of a different party than the winner of its presidential contest in the November 3 election, with Collins outperforming President Donald Trump, who lost the state to Democratic nominee Joe Biden by 9.1%.[1
 
agree

He got the skull & bones thinking it was "tough looking" when he was a 23 yo in the Marines.

A good question would be how old was he when it was pointed out to him it was also a reference to NAZIs. I do not know the answer, but maybe you know ?
This is what he said in a statement a few months ago:

“It was not until I started hearing from reporters and DC insiders that I realized this tattoo resembled a Nazi symbol,” Platner said in a statement to POLITICO on Tuesday. “I absolutely would not have gone through life having this on my chest if I knew that — and to insinuate that I did is disgusting. I am already planning to get this removed.”

What I take from that is that he found out, at minimum, some time before it became a big news story, and didn't actually go through with removing it until after it had already become a national news story. Maybe I'm being too harsh. But if I found out I had a Nazi tattoo by accident I wouldn't need to "plan" to get it removed. I would just go get it removed, immediately.
 
This is what he said in a statement a few months ago:

“It was not until I started hearing from reporters and DC insiders that I realized this tattoo resembled a Nazi symbol,” Platner said in a statement to POLITICO on Tuesday. “I absolutely would not have gone through life having this on my chest if I knew that — and to insinuate that I did is disgusting. I am already planning to get this removed.”

What I take from that is that he found out, at minimum, some time before it became a big news story, and didn't actually go through with removing it until after it had already become a national news story. Maybe I'm being too harsh. But if I found out I had a Nazi tattoo by accident I wouldn't need to "plan" to get it removed. I would just go get it removed, immediately.
Actually, he did not remove it which would have taken quite a bit of time according to him so he had it covered up, but isn't the real question whether he is a NAZI sympathizer and only covered up his tattoo in order to avoid being found out that he is a NAZI sympathizer ?

I think that getting a skull & bones tattoo is the important issue. Did he get it as drunk 23yo Marine thinking it looked tough and cool or did he get it because he was a 23yo NAZI supporter then and is a 42yo NAZI supporter now who is scrambling now to cover up his allegiance to NAZIs, because if he is a closet NAZI, then I do not support his candidacy one little bit and will stop contributing to his campaign !
 
Last edited:
Actually, he did not remove it which would have taken quite a bit of time according to him so he had it covered up, but isn't the real question whether he is a NAZI sympathizer and only covered up his tattoo in order to avoid being found out that he is a NAZI sympathizer ?

I think that getting a skull & bones tattoo is the important issue. Did he get it as drunk 23yo Marine thinking it looked tough and cool or did he get it because he was a 23yo NAZI supporter then and is a 42yo NAZI supporter now who is scrambling now to cover up his allegiance to NAZIs, because if he is a closet NAZI. If so, then I do not support his candidacy one little bit and will stop contributing to his campaign !
I don't think he's a Nazi sympathizer. I believe his story about getting the tattoo when he was a dumb 23 year old and not knowing what it meant. My issue is really about his judgment in not realizing earlier that the tattoo was problematic and/or not acting quicker to cover it up when he did realize that, and instead only doing it reactively in response to the media firestorm.
 
I don't think he's a Nazi sympathizer. I believe his story about getting the tattoo when he was a dumb 23 year old and not knowing what it meant. My issue is really about his judgment in not realizing earlier that the tattoo was problematic and/or not acting quicker to cover it up when he did realize that, and instead only doing it reactively in response to the media firestorm.
That is the question. When did he realize his tattoo was also a NAZI symbol ? Was it years ago and he said fuck it, I don't give a shit I'm going to wear it loud and proud or did he realize it after political opposition research brought it to the attention of the public and his campaign ?

If it was the former then that would most definitely trouble me.
 
I don't think he's a Nazi sympathizer. I believe his story about getting the tattoo when he was a dumb 23 year old and not knowing what it meant. My issue is really about his judgment in not realizing earlier that the tattoo was problematic and/or not acting quicker to cover it up when he did realize that, and instead only doing it reactively in response to the media firestorm.
Well, in fairness, if he didn't know what it meant when he was 23, why would he think to cover it up ten years later? Do people usually inventory their tattoos? "Better make sure none of this ink has Nazi ties?"
 
“I absolutely would not have gone through life having this on my chest if I knew that — and to insinuate that I did is disgusting.
I hate this shit. It's Stephen Miller's favorite move. Get outraged because people infer something reasonable about you.

I don't know Platner from a hole in the ground. Guy has a Nazi tattoo, I think it's reasonable to inquire about his Nazi sympathies. It's not disgusting. Just give the mea culpa and move on.

I am so. fucking. sick. of this discursive pollution. It's far more pronounced among Republicans, of course, and maybe Dems are going to need to fight fire with fire (though in this particular case it wouldn't seem helpful, at least not to me). But if this shit becomes a ubiquitous and permanent feature of our politics, torture would only begin to describe that hell.
 
I hate this shit. It's Stephen Miller's favorite move. Get outraged because people infer something reasonable about you.

I don't know Platner from a hole in the ground. Guy has a Nazi tattoo, I think it's reasonable to inquire about his Nazi sympathies. It's not disgusting. Just give the mea culpa and move on.

I am so. fucking. sick. of this discursive pollution. It's far more pronounced among Republicans, of course, and maybe Dems are going to need to fight fire with fire (though in this particular case it wouldn't seem helpful, at least not to me). But if this shit becomes a ubiquitous and permanent feature of our politics, torture would only begin to describe that hell.
agreed.

bro (platner), you have/had a nazi tattoo. people asking a lot of questions and being a bit concerned about what that could mean is not "disgusting."
 
Well, in fairness, if he didn't know what it meant when he was 23, why would he think to cover it up ten years later? Do people usually inventory their tattoos? "Better make sure none of this ink has Nazi ties?"
We all learn a lot of things between age 23 and 40 that we didn't know before. I'm a little skeptical that in the 18 years after he got the tattoo, he never saw or learned anything that made him wonder what the symbol on his tattoo really was (or that no one he knew was like "Hey that thing looks kind Nazi-like, doesn't it"?

I'm also a skeptic by nature, so this may not be entirely fair. And again, even if you take at face value that he truly didn't learn about the association until he was asked about it in 2025, I still find him waiting until after the story broke nationally to do anything about it (after saying only that he was "planning" on doing something about it) a little problematic.
 
Platner or someone who runs his campaign twitter retweeted Holocaust denier Stew Peters earlier, not exactly inspiring confidence in his newfound good judgment
Can you post the original Stew Peters tweet and the Platner or the "someone " who runs his campaign retweet ? Depending upon whether he did, that would certainly concern me. If you can't then I will just put your post in my " I don't believe you " file
 
We all learn a lot of things between age 23 and 40 that we didn't know before. I'm a little skeptical that in the 18 years after he got the tattoo, he never saw or learned anything that made him wonder what the symbol on his tattoo really was (or that no one he knew was like "Hey that thing looks kind Nazi-like, doesn't it"?

I'm also a skeptic by nature, so this may not be entirely fair. And again, even if you take at face value that he truly didn't learn about the association until he was asked about it in 2025, I still find him waiting until after the story broke nationally to do anything about it (after saying only that he was "planning" on doing something about it) a little problematic.
The positive thing is he addresses the matter at every town. Mainers don't seem to be as concerned as you do so he has that going for him.
 
The positive thing is he addresses the matter at every town. Mainers don't seem to be as concerned as you do so he has that going for him.
I'm not really that concerned. I just don't find his explanation of when he found out about the problem or what he did about it fully satisfying.
 
Platner is a hell of a lot more contrite about having a skull and bones tattoo than Bush and Kerry were about actually belonging to the Skull and Bones Society.
 
Can you post the original Stew Peters tweet and the Platner or the "someone " who runs his campaign retweet ? Depending upon whether he did, that would certainly concern me. If you can't then I will just put your post in my " I don't believe you " file
 
We all learn a lot of things between age 23 and 40 that we didn't know before. I'm a little skeptical that in the 18 years after he got the tattoo, he never saw or learned anything that made him wonder what the symbol on his tattoo really was (or that no one he knew was like "Hey that thing looks kind Nazi-like, doesn't it"?

I'm also a skeptic by nature, so this may not be entirely fair. And again, even if you take at face value that he truly didn't learn about the association until he was asked about it in 2025, I still find him waiting until after the story broke nationally to do anything about it (after saying only that he was "planning" on doing something about it) a little problematic.
In fairness, I know a few things about history and I did not recognize the tattoo as a Nazi symbol. I mean, I don't study regalia, but I think I'm a pretty good litmus test. If I didn't know, it can't be implausible that he wouldn't know.

Now, I would have checked before getting it (assuming I got tattoos which I don't), but if we buy the drunken tattoo story than I think most of it holds together.
 
If true that’s quite the own goal.
Ugh. I mean, there's nothing in that post that is objectionable, so retweeting it would be no concern at all but for the author. And just because a person is a holocaust denier doesn't mean they are wrong about Middle Eastern wars.

For me, the bigger question is why they were following that account, and/or why they decided to retweet that instead of what is surely hundreds of other similarly phrased tweets.

Was that on twitter or bluesky, the original tweet? If it was on twitter, maybe the lesson is: get the fuck off twitter.
 
Back
Top