ACCT: dook Biorhythms, 7:00 pm Start

Your initial choices are Carolina, and the other 4 (these 3 plus your edit) are alphabetically New Mexico, Ohio St, Oklahoma, and Vandy.

Carolina is 1-12 in Q1, but that is only one data point. #41 is 3-4 in Q2, their efficiency-based metrics are worse than Carolina, and their wins-based metrics are worse, too. #42 has 2 Q3 losses, as you noted, their efficiency metrics are worse, and they didn't play a schedule as tough. #44 has 2 losses outside of Q1 and their efficiency metrics are worse - their ORtg is identical to Carolina's, but their DRtg is worse, if you can imagine that. #47 has a pathetic OOC SOS, 3 losses outside of Q1, and worse offensive and defensive efficiency metrics.
Indeed! And this is why I’m holding out hope UNC gets in over all of those teams on the chart. If the committee looks at everything, and not just Q1, our numbers look as good or better than the other bubbles.
 
If Carolina doesn’t get in, what do people think about an NIT bid? I’m indifferent, but if the kids wanted it that counts for something.
 
If Carolina doesn’t get in, what do people think about an NIT bid? I’m indifferent, but if the kids wanted it that counts for something.
Another couple games in CH possible Good for fans that don't normally get in Players get to play etc Even a few dollars made
Now what I have no clue about is ,are there 5-6 players that just want to focus quickly on their portal/NBA futures ?
 
Focus should immediately turn to next season with the portal opening.
If the GM does what we think, does that involve Hubert immediately? I wouldn't think so and I'm not even sure that he could be involved while the season is still going on. I don't know that but it seems strange if he is allowed.
 
I would think Turner and HD will be working full time in constructing next year’s roster - both in retaining and acquiring players.
 
Back
Top