My point, which I struggle to remember now, was related to the fact that peoples' views of truth vs misinformation are impacted by their bias and political views, which are also impacted news coverage. TV news tends to give attention to stories that get ratings.
It would take some time to find it, but the most recent study on police shootings showed that white people, as a percentage of police interactions (vs per capita) are more likely to be shot than black people.
And this is a perfect example of making numbers say what one wants them to. This statement seems to indicate that white people are at greater risk, which isn't true. That's why we use per capita numbers.
I do agree that everyone has some bias. But with so much information available, if one wants to overcome their biases and know more of the truth they can. Most of the low knowledge voters (trump voters) don't care to know the truth, they just accept what fits into their worldview.
This is the basic problem with the social medial algorithms, because they are focused on keeping one engaged and therefore making more money, their algorithms keep feeding them the same information. It doesn't give them counter arguments or dissenting opinions.
But if one takes the time to do some reading and is willing to accept information from noted expert sources, even if it disagrees with their current position, then they can overcome the biases.
Like those who are claiming the economy is horrible. What do the numbers actually report?
1) We know that inflation is coming down, the CIP and other measurement tools indicate that.
2) We know this isn't the worst inflation we've ever had, I'm sure those who had 17% mortgage interest rates in the late '70's can attest to that.
3) We know that most every noted economist is impressed by the US being able to achieve a soft landing without a recession coming out of the COVID issues.
4) We know that the Fed reduced the rates because all of their indicators show the inflation slowing.
5) We know that we have great unemployment numbers and new jobs numbers.
These things, my bias has no bearing on, they are provable facts. So biases can be overcome.
Now if one wants to not read any of this information and claim that because their groceries went up 10% that the economy is tanking, that is their bias speaking.
To be honest, I basically don't watch the news. I have multiple new sources, podcast, and websites that I trust and frequent for my news.