Biden pardons | BIDEN ISSUES PREEMPTIVE PARDONS - Family, Fauci, J6 Committee, Others

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlueSmoke
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 693
  • Views: 15K
  • Politics 
Guy, do you not understand the difference between engaging in a conversation with another person and posting 19 times in a row for no purpose other than flaming? It really only takes a moment's thought -- heck, half a moment's thought -- to see the obvious fallacy. Try taking a moment before posting.
No, I do. I also understand the ridiculously high level of hypocrisy you are demonstrating now, in this thread. Frankly, that poster was at least addressing the point of the thread, although spamming. You are not even doing that.

Edit: Now that I'm thinking about it, didn't you also create a thread complaining about other users posting off-topic, "which ruins the thread?"
 
I'm curious, where do you get your information about the following
1) 20 shell companies [first I'm hearing of this ... is this from Fox, OANN, Newsmax?]
updates with links ... https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...nter-biden-car-payment-reimbursement-his-dad/
2) the 10% [of what exactly?] for the big guy
Please provide links, etc..

I realize that Hunter Biden was clearly using the Biden name to get his jobs with Burisma and in China. I think everyone understands that. Hunter's a douchebag, but I haven't yet seen evidence that Joe Biden benefited from Hunter's career. Please provide.
Whenever an assertion begins with “everyone knows” it usually means the proponent has no proof for it.
 
Whenever an assertion begins with “everyone knows” it usually means the proponent has no proof for it.
What, that everyone ... okay, most people capable of rational thought ... understands that Hunter Biden was using his family name to enrich himself?
 
No, I do. I also understand the ridiculously high level of hypocrisy you are demonstrating now, in this thread. Frankly, that poster was at least addressing the point of the thread, although spamming. You are not even doing that.
I didn't start the conversation. I merely interceded in order to correct an assertion that was made in error. It doesn't matter, it's over now.

I'm not sure you do actually understand this "ridiculously high level of hypocrisy." Hypocrisy, after all, is doing the same thing one criticizes others for. Since we have now agreed that I was not in fact doing that, where's the hypocrisy? Please point it out for me.
 

Can you imagine Fox News, or any conservative media outlet, engage in handwringing like this about Trump's pardons of a number of convicted felons? I can't.
 
Our so-called "news media" is hopelessly broken, imo. There is now a clear and definite double standard for Trump Republicans and Democrats. Trump Republicans can be as outrageous, insane, and horrible as they want and the media shrugs, including now even most legacy "mainstream" media. Democrats do something controversial but still far down the scale of outrage compared to Trump and his minions, and the media is all over it and plays it up as beyond the pale. It's as if one sibling yells harshly at another one for running around the yard in the nude and taking a dump in full view of the neighbors while screaming like a crazy man, and everyone criticizes the sibling who yelled and just pretends to ignore the one running around nude in public and acting like a lunatic.
 

Can you imagine Fox News, or any conservative media outlet, engage in handwringing like this about Trump's pardons of a number of convicted felons? I can't.
Maybe rather than fawning over the same media that told you excerpts of biden's frailty and mental decline were deep fakes, that told you harris was ahead in the polls, that lied to you about actual relevant election stories, and intentionally changed answers given in interviews, you might want to think about finding new sources of information. Your attitude is exactly why an impartial press and ethical journalism don't exist. They do these things and you think they are great because they tell you what you want to hear. Any you think that is something to be admired?
 
Maybe rather than fawning over the same media that told you excerpts of biden's frailty and mental decline were deep fakes, that told you harris was ahead in the polls, that lied to you about actual relevant election stories, and intentionally changed answers given in interviews, you might want to think about finding new sources of information. Your attitude is exactly why an impartial press and ethical journalism don't exist. They do these things and you think they are great because they tell you what you want to hear. Any you think that is something to be admired?
"finding new sources of information"

What sources do you suggest Callatoroy? And how do you know that these sources of information that you get your information from are more accurate than the so-called MSM? Are they 'impartial?' How do you know this?
 
I didn't start the conversation. I merely interceded in order to correct an assertion that was made in error. It doesn't matter, it's over now.

I'm not sure you do actually understand this "ridiculously high level of hypocrisy." Hypocrisy, after all, is doing the same thing one criticizes others for. Since we have now agreed that I was not in fact doing that, where's the hypocrisy? Please point it out for me.
I already pointed out your hypocrisy in this thread, related to the other threadS you've created. I'm glad to hear it's over.
 

Can you imagine Fox News, or any conservative media outlet, engage in handwringing like this about Trump's pardons of a number of convicted felons? I can't.
NPR must have run the “OMG! Joe Biden pardoned Hunter!” every 20 minutes today.
 
Well, then, I'm legitimately very proud of you for admitting your own hypocrisy, especially after whatever that weird 2 AM posting binge was not even 12 hours ago where you were calling everyone else a hypocrite. I mean that in all sincerity. It can't have been easy. I can honestly say that I've never seen someone openly state that they recognize that they can't claim to care about the rule of law because they know their candidate is a wanton lawbreaker. That took some guts and

Everybody knew he would just like everybody knows why Hunter was paid all those millions, just like everybody knows why a family who has no businesses or sells any goods or even has a website needs 20 shell companies, just like everybody knows the laptop was real, just like everybody knows where the 10% for the big guy went.

If you were willing to ignore all of this corruption and vote for Biden again had he run, not even factoring in the damage done to the country by his incompetent administration (or maybe very competent if you know

lol
 
Is it hypocritical to think Hunter should do jail time for tax evasion (when he paid back the $2 million or whatever it was), but when Trump avoids hundreds of millions in taxes, they write it off as “everyone does it!???”
 
Is it hypocritical to think Hunter should do jail time for tax evasion (when he paid back the $2 million or whatever it was), but when Trump avoids hundreds of millions in taxes, they write it off as “everyone does it!???”
Avoidance should be everyone's goal. There is a whole industry dedicated to it.
 
Back
Top