Biorhythms for ACCT UNC v Clemson: 9:30 Start

  • Thread starter Thread starter donbosco
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 197
  • Views: 3K
  • UNC Sports 
stankeylegjones said:
This was a game we should have won. With Welling, Clemson was not playing very well, at all, here of late, by the eye test, by wins and loses, and by the metrics. So fucking disappointing that once again we come out flat and not fully engaged until the game is (all but) out of reach, fight back, and ultimately fall short.
Click to expand...
What part of that triggered the move in their favor before game time?
 
finesse said:
Yes, but literally everybody on our side made plays that lost us the game. Now some did a lot more to win it than lose it but Veesaar had multiple turnovers, Trimble had that dumb foul at the end of the first half and the two of them cost us a shot at the end of the half. I thought even when we were really down that our main problem was we couldn't shoot. I wonder our much our numbers went up in the last 5 minutes. I was disappointed by the loss but if youshhoot like hell, you get bad results.
Click to expand...

Those players also made positive plays to varying degrees

You can't have 20 mins of absolutely nothing from the guard spot and expect to win in March
 
Centerpiece said:
Not sure about roster match-ups, but on the surface this seems like it would be a favorable draw for us to make it to the 2nd weekend. If we can shoot, that is.
Click to expand...

A six is preferable to a seven seed since it brings a second game match-up with a three rather and a two. The likely twos are Iowa State, UConn, Michigan State, and Houston. Threes are Illinois, Alabama, Nebraska, and Gonzaga.
 
Heelsandeers said:
Jaydon Young 12 mins: 0-3, 0 pts, 0 rebs, 0 asts, 0 blks, 0 stls, 1 foul

Kyan Evans 6 mins: 0-1, 0 pts, 0 rebs, 0 asts, 0 blks, 0 stls, 1 foul, 1 turnover
Click to expand...
That’s pretty much what we’ve gotten out of Evans all season, except for the minutes, which started out much higher.
 
Icky Mettle said:
That’s pretty much what we’ve gotten out of Evans all season, except for the minutes, which started out much higher.
Click to expand...

Yeah, for the second season in a row the ceiling of UNC was severely capped by recruiting misses

Can't afford to allocate top $ and roster spots to players who can barely crack the rotation
 
stankeylegjones said:
This was a game we should have won. With Welling, Clemson was not playing very well, at all, here of late, by the eye test, by wins and loses, and by the metrics. So fucking disappointing that once again we come out flat and not fully engaged until the game is (all but) out of reach, fight back, and ultimately fall short.
Click to expand...
Yes, this pattern is disturbing.
 
finesse said:
What part of that triggered the move in their favor before game time?
Click to expand...
No clue, I don't really follow, nor understand the inner working of betting lines. Maybe odds makers have lost all confidence in HD getting the team ready to play away from home? Honestly, no clue. Do you think Clemson has more talent than us? Is a better team than us?

I can say that their T-rank was 68 this past month, their KenPom rating is 36, they're 5-4 in this past month, they're a projected 8 seed, etc. Those numbers include Welling.

We should have won this game. Period. We came out unmotivated, seemingly uninterested to be there, listless (as Rob described us). That should not happen.
 
SnoopRob said:
I don’t think anyone knows other than the obvious “Vegas needed to get more bets on the Heels” explanation.
Click to expand...
I did a pretty good look in search of any clues and the best thing that I came up with was vague, perhaps even imagined by me, intimations that clemson would slow the game and play it brutishly and that we'd have no answer for that. I can't pull up any attribution whatsoever.
 
Heelsandeers said:
Yeah, for the second season in a row the ceiling of UNC was severely capped by recruiting misses

Can't afford to allocate top $ and roster spots to players who can barely crack the rotation
Click to expand...
I don't think this is entirely true. Last year we definitely had major roster issues.

But I think Hubert put together a really good team this year with the exception of Evans. Luka has been a bit of a disappointment, but he has contributed. Evans has just done nothing.

JP and Stevenson have largely done what we hoped they would do. Dixon has been a huge bonus. Henri - way better than advertised. Caleb - generational talent. Nobody thought Jayden would do much this year. Seth has been more inconsistent than I thought he would be from an energy/ effort/ defensive standpoint, but really everyone else has met or exceeded expectations. Without injuries we're a top 12 team, is that good enough? I guess that is debatable.
 
bassydude77 said:
I don't think this is entirely true. Last year we definitely had major roster issues.
Click to expand...

One of those roster issues was having nobody at the 4. Tyson was supposed to play a lot of those mins

Obviously he wasn't the only issue with that roster

bassydude77 said:
But I think Hubert put together a really good team this year with the exception of Evans
Click to expand...

Pretty big exception. Had Dixon not been able to step into a larger role than he should have as a freshman it would have been ugly

When your backup PG becomes your starting PG is why you're playing Jaydon Young in the first place

The roster was better/more balanced than the season prior. They just whiffed on the position that could afford it least
 
Had we landed Nick Boyd, our first target, we'd have been very very difficult to deal with (well with a truly healthy team that is). He's been really good at UW.
 
Heelsandeers said:
Jaydon Young 12 mins: 0-3, 0 pts, 0 rebs, 0 asts, 0 blks, 0 stls, 1 foul

Kyan Evans 6 mins: 0-1, 0 pts, 0 rebs, 0 asts, 0 blks, 0 stls, 1 foul, 1 turnover
Click to expand...
And I spent what feels like all 18 minutes these two were on the floor asking myself “wtf are they doing out there?” and “get them out of the game!”. Alas . . .
 
Didn't watch the game, but noticed Luke had a quiet game. I'm suspecting teams are giving him more defensive emphasis to get him off his spots. Two bad games, two losses.
 
CRHeel94 said:
Didn't watch the game, but noticed Luke had a quiet game. I'm suspecting teams are giving him more defensive emphasis to get him off his spots. Two bad games, two losses.
Click to expand...

He didn't have more than 1-2 clean looks all night

Also left his feet with no one to pass to, throwing the ball straight out of bounds, again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top