Board Trump supporters

  • Thread starter Thread starter theel4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 311
  • Views: 5K
  • Politics 
He’s 100% in there but they will redact/remove any reference to him. Any curious/competent person would be able to see and prove they removed him, but his supporters are neither curious nor competent and won’t care. I wouldn’t put it past them to ADD political enemies to the report even if never involved with Epstein. And the same MAGA base will accept without question.
Not expecting much from this, and expecting a largely successful cover up. I think this may well be one of several things going on to take attention away from the bill that just passed, and which is taking massive steps towards turning the United States into a giant version of North Korea. Both the Trump/Republican destruction of journalism, and the ongoing self-immolation of many journalistic enterprises in America are also big parts of this process.

Many people in America will love this process, just as many people in North Korea love the actions of their government.
 
Because you are an emotionally handicapped person being driven by hate rather than an emotionally mature person who's education / age / wisdom keeps him from jumping to conclusions and having some degree of perspective. So, you can't tell me what "being in the files" means. You sound like Carolina Fever, not an educated lawyer with your "99% likely to have fucked underage girls" claim.
You think it's + or - 50% that Trump, while an adult, has fucked girls under the age of 18? If it's minus, you're an idiot. And if it's plus, how could you still show your face here? I certainly wouldn't if I had voted for him.
 
And I just want to be clear about this -- if there was a 1% chance I thought a person I had voted for to be president of the United States had fucked underage girls, I would gladly give up my voting rights for the rest of my life. It's one of the many reasons I despised Bill Clinton. I just can't believe people who support the party that voted to impeach Clinton are somehow now okay with a guy who you seriously have to evaluate if the over-under is 50%. It's fucking pathetic. And I can't believe you guys can't answer the fucking question.
 
The answer to OP, as others have stated, is no effing way.

Trump has ALREADY been proven to be so corrupt and deviant, but that did not matter to the cultists and neither will this.

You could even have a video of it (ahem, hi Rudy) and his believers would say it is faked or otherwise a 'witch hunt'.

There is no reason or reasonable conversation with these people, and the more the rest of the world sees it and proves it the more the MAGAts will dig into their bunker with their dear leader.
 
I'm not quite so sold on morality as a sticking point if the other party is of age and consenting. I do find the difference in the treatment of Clinton vs. Newt or Trump or pick any of several to be extremely hypocritical. As best as I can tell, Clinton couldn't keep his dick in his pants and had terrible taste in women. Didn't seem to be much other carryover. Trump is strictly a moral degenerate. He's a habitual liar, a braggart, a cheat, has no business ethics, is stupid, whiny and mean. I wouldn't want him to even live in my neighborhood, much less be president.
 
100% in the files
100% what is in the files would be embarrassing for him
100% he knew Epstein was trafficking and screwing underaged girls and didn’t care.
I won’t speculate on chances that Trump himself slept with underaged girls.

There will be a few supporters who would voice displeasure if he did sleep with underaged girls. But they along with every other Trump voter would vote for him for a third term.
It's telling, imo, that the legal age for sexual consent has remained just sixteen or seventeen in 38 of the 50 states, including NC. There have been some Republican state legislators in recent years who have fought raising the legal marriage age in their states to 18. A New Hampshire Republican legislator in 2024 said in a speech that under-18 girls were "ripe" and "fertile" and opposed raising the legal marriage age in NH to 18 (previously, girls in NH as young as 13 could marry with permission from a judge). In 2023 a Missouri Republican legislator, in proposing a bill that would ban gender-affirming care for minors, said that he knew 12-year-old girls who had gotten married and who were still married - even as he claimed his proposed ban on gender-affirming care was being done to "protect" minors. A Missouri Democrat pointed out the obvious contradiction in his claims to be protecting minors while he was apparently OK with 12-year-olds being allowed to marry.

I do think there still exists in some parts of the country - mainly more rural and socially conservative areas - the idea that underage girls dating or marrying much older men isn't such a bad thing. When Roy Moore was defeated (barely) in that notorious 2017 Alabama special Senate election for sexually harassing, dating, and assaulting underage girls when he was in his thirties and forties (including hanging around his local shopping mall in his mid-thirties trying to hit on and pick up underage girls at the mall) there were stories in some articles about that election in which conservative religious voters in Alabama implied that underage girls dating much older men wasn't such a big deal. I remember one of the women who said Moore had sexually assaulted her in his car when she was underage said in an article that her own mother had told her that she was "lucky" that such a powerful and important older man (Moore was an assistant DA at the time) was showing a romantic interest in her. And Franklin Graham defended Moore and attacked his critics, asserting that they were "guilty of doing much worse than what he has been accused of supposedly doing" and another Alabama preacher defended Moore by saying that he was a "veteran" who had returned from military service to find that most women his age were already married, so he had sought out "the purity of young [underage] women."

I heard some similar sentiments growing up in rural NC, although I would also point out that plenty of others disagreed. I do think there is a larger number of people than many realize who privately still believe underage girls being preyed on by older men isn't such a big deal, as disgusting as that is.
 
Last edited:
It's telling, imo, that the legal age for sexual consent has remained just sixteen or seventeen in 38 of the 50 states, including NC. There have been some Republican state legislators in recent years who have fought raising the legal marriage age in their states to 18. A New Hampshire Republican legislator in 2024 said in a speech that under-18 girls were "ripe" and "fertile" and opposed raising the legal marriage age in NH to 18 (previously, girls in NH as young as 13 could marry with permission from a judge). In 2023 a Missouri Republican legislator, in proposing a bill that would ban gender-affirming care for minors, said that he knew 12-year-old girls who had gotten married and who were still married - even as he claimed his proposed ban on gender-affirming care was being done to "protect" minors. A Missouri Democrat pointed out the obvious contradiction in his claims to be protecting minors while he was apparently OK with 12-year-olds being allowed to marry.

I do think there still exists in some parts of the country - mainly more rural and socially conservative areas - the idea that underage girls dating or marrying much older men isn't such a bad thing. When Roy Moore was defeated (barely) in that notorious 2017 Alabama special Senate election for sexually harassing, dating, and assaulting underage girls when he was in his thirties and forties (including hanging around his local shopping mall in his mid-thirties trying to hit on and pick up underage girls at the mall) there were stories in some articles about that election in which conservative religious voters in Alabama implied that underage girls dating much older men wasn't such a big deal. I remember one of the women who said Moore had sexually assaulted her in his car when she was underage said in an article that her own mother had told her that she was "lucky" that such a powerful and important older man (Moore was an assistant DA at the time) was showing a romantic interest in her. And Franklin Graham defended Moore and attacked his critics, asserting that they were "guilty of doing much worse than what he has been accused of supposedly doing" and another Alabama preacher defended Moore by saying that he was a "veteran" who had returned from military service to find that most women his age were already married, so he had sought out "the purity of young [underage] women."

I heard some similar sentiments growing up in rural NC, although I would also point out that plenty of others disagreed. I do think there is a larger number of people who privately still believe underage girls being preyed on by older men isn't such a big deal, as disgusting as that is.
Fair enough. But there's a galactical difference between a 17 yo high school junior fucking a 16 yo high school sophomore and a 50 yo billionaire real estate developer fucking a 16 yo human trafficking victim. Neither one is ok, but it's the latter that calla voted for to be his dictator-in-chief.
 
Do you think he "hooked up" with any girls Epstein Island.

do you think he witnessed others doing things with girls on Epstein Island.

Do you think that any of these girls were under 18?
Do I think he visited ep island? Don't know - possibly - is that what being in the files means?
Do I think he hooked up with any girls at ep island - if he visited - possibly
Do i think they were underaged - possibly - if he was there
Do I think it's reasonable to wait for further info to come out - yep - given that these files were in the hands of the dims during the election
Do I think if the dims had any evidence trump was there they would use it - yep
Am I claiming trump is innocent - nope
Am I claiming he is guilty - nope
 
Do I think he visited ep island? Don't know - possibly - is that what being in the files means?
Do I think he hooked up with any girls at ep island - if he visited - possibly
Do i think they were underaged - possibly - if he was there
Do I think it's reasonable to wait for further info to come out - yep - given that these files were in the hands of the dims during the election
Do I think if the dims had any evidence trump was there they would use it - yep
Am I claiming trump is innocent - nope
Am I claiming he is guilty - nope
The sooner you come to terms with the fact you'll do anything to JCD the worst of all of us, the sooner you can start the process of rejoining the moral universe.
 
You think it's + or - 50% that Trump, while an adult, has fucked girls under the age of 18? If it's minus, you're an idiot. And if it's plus, how could you still show your face here? I certainly wouldn't if I had voted for him.
What, beyond hatred, is your basis for claiming it is more than 50% likely trump screwed underage girls? Gut? Hunch?
 
The sooner you come to terms with the fact you'll do anything to JCD the worst of all of us, the sooner you can start the process of rejoining the moral universe.
Was morality or ethics taught in law school? Were you taught to pre-judge?
 
Evidence. Including every single thing Trump has done over the last week. Have you been paying attention?
His actions this week is the proof you need to know he fucked underage girls in the past? Is that what you are really saying?
 
Fair enough. But there's a galactical difference between a 17 yo high school junior fucking a 16 yo high school sophomore and a 50 yo billionaire real estate developer fucking a 16 yo human trafficking victim. Neither one is ok, but it's the latter that calla voted for to be his dictator-in-chief.
Oh I agree, and I'm not talking about people the same age fooling around, that's perfectly normal. I am talking about the issue of much older lecherous men abusing underage girls. What I was pointing out - in regards to the point of this thread - is that there are more social conservatives who aren't bothered by much older men marrying or dating underage girls as one would hope, although they'll likely never admit it publicly. And yes it is disgusting.
 
Calla, when we first started going back and forth on this board, Biden was president and Trump was just theoretically promising to destroy the republic. As of November, you guys caught the car. I know it sucks to have to defend the catastrophic shitshow that was just a theory before, but that's where you are now. You own all of this. You either defend the Pedophile in Chief, or you don't. I don't care either way. But don't piss on our leg and tell us it's raining. You won't get away with that here.
 
Calla, when we first started going back and forth on this board, Biden was president and Trump was just theoretically promising to destroy the republic. As of November, you guys caught the car. I know it sucks to have to defend the catastrophic shitshow that was just a theory before, but that's where you are now. You own all of this. You either defend the Pedophile in Chief, or you don't. I don't care either way. But don't piss on our leg and tell us it's raining. You won't get away with that here.
What is the catastrophic shitshow that you are referring to?
 
Do I think if the dims had any evidence trump was there they would use it - yep

So then you admit your god king is a liar. Because if the Democrats created the "Epstein Hoax" as he insists, they would have released that information. Otherwise, why go to the trouble? And if you can admit that, you have to ask yourself why he would lie and disparage the very people (like yourself) who have walked through fire to support him. And when you ask yourself that question, you know, as we all do, the answer means you've been wrong about him for some time. You're almost there... just a couple more dots.
 
Back
Top