Board Trump supporters

  • Thread starter Thread starter theel4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 311
  • Views: 5K
  • Politics 
Because the right makes it so easy, since they are so obvious.
Race plays a part in almost every aspect of life. We have white / black / latino / asian / and ME (and all of the socioeconomic variables and differences that come with it) living all over this country. It is a variable that the left is afraid to talk about with any degree of honesty yet decisions are made in every state and nationwide by people pretending that we are a country with no racial diversity because the left loses their minds.
 
Race plays a part in almost every aspect of life. We have white / black / latino / asian / and ME (and all of the socioeconomic variables and differences that come with it) living all over this country. It is a variable that the left is afraid to talk about with any degree of honesty yet decisions are made in every state and nationwide by people pretending that we are a country with no racial diversity because the left loses their minds.
I agree with the first two sentences.

I don't agree at all with the last part.

From what I've seen the left wants to treat everyone equally no matter their race.

The right on the other hand, maybe far right, but still right, owns the racist groups in the US. They own those who hide behind the confederate flag as "Heritage" when it's really overt racism.

Why would anyone "pretend" that we are a country with no racial diversity when it is so blatantly obvious? The left doesn't have a problem actually discussing the issue of race. But you seem to be mixing up discussing and people making decisions to avoid other races.

I would say that the group that was so against diversity, equity, and inclusion is more the group that is avoiding the conversation. The group that was against classes to better understand other races, that's the group that I would look to as having an issue with diversity and race, not the group that clearly makes discussing and honoring diversity a priority.
 
That just can't be Ram. The fact that their kids were in private school at all means they were wearing hoods inside their homes.
All rich liberals send their kids to the most $$ private schools while advocating public schools for everyone else.
 
All rich liberals send their kids to the most $$ private schools while advocating public schools for everyone else.
Lol...most all truly rich people send their kids to private schools for the same kinds of classist reasons that they always have.

Most middle or upper middle class liberal people send their kids to public schools.
 
Yet.,,,I was called a racist for basically taking this position for my children.

Do you guys have ANY self awareness?
I've yet to ever see you advocate for anything positive for public schools and the betterment of education overall.

You literally have cheered for defunding the likes of Seaame Street and the only real source of quality documentary work in the country over the last 50 years.

So, you've advocated for private schools for your own kids and Nada for the rest of society so far as I can see.
 
I've yet to ever see you advocate for anything positive for public schools and the betterment of education overall.

You literally have cheered for defunding the likes of Seaame Street and the only real source of quality documentary work in the country over the last 50 years.

So, you've advocated for private schools for your own kids and Nada for the rest of society so far as I can see.
I pay A LOT for ATL public education ~ like 14k per year. What do you do?
 
Yet.,,,I was called a racist for basically taking this position for my children.

Do you guys have ANY self awareness?
i don't know about that. Do you also advocate for public schools being the best though? The voucher system hurts public schools and is rigged with public money.

Easy access to good public schools + private/home if that's your cup of tea. Can we agree?
 
I pay A LOT for ATL public education ~ like 14k per year. What do you do?
Lol, I pay property taxes as well chief. I also donated a $25,000 printer/copier this past year and committed to all paper/toner/supplies/maintenance for it for a local elementary school. I keep my credit card on file at 3 schools to cover lunches for any kids who cant afford them. I do angel tree donations every Christmas. I read at local schools and volunteer at events often. Im also a volunteer tutor and mentor for some high school students.

So we are back to you doing not a damned thing for the education of anyone other than your own kids, which is fine if that's what you want to do...but dont pretend (as you did in the post i replied to) that you advocate/work for better schools for the public.
 
Lol, I pay property taxes as well chief. I also donated a $25,000 printer/copier this past year and committed to all paper/toner/supplies/maintenance for it for a local elementary school. I keep my credit card on file at 3 schools to cover lunches for any kids who cant afford them. I do angel tree donations every Christmas. I read at local schools and volunteer at events often. Im also a volunteer tutor and mentor for some high school students.

So we are back to you doing not a damned thing for the education of anyone other than your own kids, which is fine if that's what you want to do...but dont pretend (as you did in the post i replied to) that you advocate/work for better schools for the public.
That's a drop mic post right there, I don't care who you are 😎

and about that 14k ram pays for public schools in Atlanta... what are the chances he would prefer paying zero in public school taxes ?

As for myself I pay 8k in property and 2k in school taxes and I have no school age children. I imagine ram's actual school tax is roughly the same as mine;)

That public school system provided my two kids with a damn good education. I didn't mind paying school tax then and I don't mind paying the school tax for the kids who have followed my kids since.
 
You know I participated in multiple different types of education for my kids. Public school, private school, home school, a cooperative, a Montessori, paid tutors, etc. Much dictated by my income.

My only goal was the best opportunity for my kids. It had nothing to do with the area or the demographics.

Now that my kids are out of school, I support the best possible public education system possible, because I know how hard it can be on parents.

I don't believe diverting public funds to private schools is the answer. At the same time I have no animosity towards those who can afford private schools and utilize them. I assume their reasoning is the same as mine was.
 
You know I participated in multiple different types of education for my kids. Public school, private school, home school, a cooperative, a Montessori, paid tutors, etc. Much dictated by my income.

My only goal was the best opportunity for my kids. It had nothing to do with the area or the demographics.

Now that my kids are out of school, I support the best possible public education system possible, because I know how hard it can be on parents.

I don't believe diverting public funds to private schools is the answer. At the same time I have no animosity towards those who can afford private schools and utilize them. I assume their reasoning is the same as mine was.
At some point in this country it just became accepted that parents had little say so where their kids went to school. I'm not sure when that happened, or even why. However, in 2025 it seems crazy to me that the best option is to say, unless you can afford to send your kids to private school the only option is to go to the school where your house is zoned. Of course that led to all types of ways parents tried to circumvent the system. Most drastic being to move into a better district.

Ram is paying a pretty hefty property tax bill. He shouldn't be penalized from benefiting from his taxes if he sends his kids to a school that better serves their needs. Competition in education is a good thing. The cream always rises to the top and the poorest performing schools will either close or be forced to improve.
 
At some point in this country it just became accepted that parents had little say so where their kids went to school. I'm not sure when that happened, or even why. However, in 2025 it seems crazy to me that the best option is to say, unless you can afford to send your kids to private school the only option is to go to the school where your house is zoned. Of course that led to all types of ways parents tried to circumvent the system. Most drastic being to move into a better district.

Ram is paying a pretty hefty property tax bill. He shouldn't be penalized from benefiting from his taxes if he sends his kids to a school that better serves their needs. Competition in education is a good thing. The cream always rises to the top and the poorest performing schools will either close or be forced to improve.
I believe you can opt to go to different public schools outside district, you can in Ga, you have to provide your personal transportation.

The property taxes thing just doesn't work unless we are sharing the load. We can't exempt people for sending their kids to private school or for not having children in the school system or the system would collapse.

My kids are no longer in school, yet my property taxes go up regularly. Not quite at Buckhead levels, but I'm paying almost $8k. Of which I believe about 40% is for schools.
 
The cream always rises to the top and the poorest performing schools will either close or be forced to improve.
If they could only get rid of those poorly performing students. My wife routinely gets kids in middle school reading at second or third grade level. These are kids who are sleeping in their mama's car or always hugging a pillow while watching TV so her mama's latest baby daddy won't keep commenting on how she's growing some nice tits. The poorest performing schools are full of kids who don't have parents who give a shit about their education and provide terrible examples for their kids. Frequently these kids have never been in the same school two years in a row, so yeah, let's hold those schools accountable. The problem isn't the schools, so how can you force them to improve? All they need to improve is better kids with better parents, but somebody is left holding the bag for these left behind kids. But whatever, let's punish those schools.
 
At some point in this country it just became accepted that parents had little say so where their kids went to school. I'm not sure when that happened, or even why. However, in 2025 it seems crazy to me that the best option is to say, unless you can afford to send your kids to private school the only option is to go to the school where your house is zoned. Of course that led to all types of ways parents tried to circumvent the system. Most drastic being to move into a better district.

Ram is paying a pretty hefty property tax bill. He shouldn't be penalized from benefiting from his taxes if he sends his kids to a school that better serves their needs. Competition in education is a good thing. The cream always rises to the top and the poorest performing schools will either close or be forced to improve.
Unless you think that people with no children should be exempt from funding schools, then your argument that someone should be able to choose what schools to fund for their kids via property taxes makes no sense. Public schools are a shared common expense that the entire community pays into and benefits from. Period. Other schooling options are outside of that context and should be funded outside of that context. The reason that other schooling options are outside of that context is that those schooling options are not available to everyone. Open them to everyone with no applicaiton process and I'm all on board with funding them with public funds...because then they benefit...ya know...the public...
 
Back
Top