Bye bye Pam Bondi

Ramrouser said:
Trump’s 2.0 team won’t turn on him.
Click to expand...

If they don't it's only because they are complicit in his criminal schemes. Can't rat out the murderer when you're an accessory!

We are now at the stage where Trump is getting word he's failing and his numbers are putrid. Like any true narcissist he's incapable of looking inward, he's gonna fire everyone in his orbit because it's, very obviously, their fault.
 
tarheelbillie said:
Is it the haircut or just the shape of his head? Think the head may be a perfect egg.
Click to expand...
That cat has always had hair issues. I think it’s mental.

charlestoncitypaper.com

Trey Gowdy is leaving Congress and so is his hair - Charleston City Paper

After Congressman Trey Gowdy's announcement yesterday that he'll leave Congress, the well-wishes from friends started pouring in, lamenting their colleague's career change.But you know what went unmentioned in his friends' tweets and press releases? Trey Gowdy's hair's departure from politics.
charlestoncitypaper.com charlestoncitypaper.com
 
Zoo_View said:
Do you think their replacements will be improvements?
Click to expand...
At this point who cares. It’s not at all about improvements, it’s about the public spectacle of his spiral and tantrums, and how the prominent faces he’s hung his maga hat on go down in flames for all swing voters to see.

He would not be replacing people close to him if things were going well for him. Even the dumbest voters can piece that together, and that’s what matters.
 
RaiGuy said:
We've reached the stage of the presidency where trump starts firing people left and right. I hope it pisses her off and she turns on him.
Click to expand...
Yep. Trump administrations are a revolving door of “the best people.”
 
Kingpin said:
Actually not necessarily. Ty Cobb said on CNN thatTrump is looking for someone who will be more effective at prosecuting his enemies. So we shall see.
Click to expand...
Bondi wasn’t willing to take that extra step of planting evidence or suborning perjury to try to make something out of those cases where no crimes occurred. Trump’s hoping the next person will.
 
Kingpin said:
Actually not necessarily. Ty Cobb said on CNN thatTrump is looking for someone who will be more effective at prosecuting his enemies. So we shall see.
Click to expand...
Bondi was at least qualified on paper, if ethically compromised.

Talented people aren't historically likely to want to work for this shit show. Competence has always taken a back seat to obsequiousness. As such, I don't have a lot of anxiety that the next round of boot lickers will be more effective.
 
duluoz said:
At this point who cares. It’s not at all about improvements, it’s about the public spectacle of his spiral and tantrums, and how the prominent faces he’s hung his maga hat on go down in flames for all swing voters to see.

He would not be replacing people close to him if things were going well for him. Even the dumbest voters can piece that together, and that’s what matters.
Click to expand...
Well, maybe not the dumbest.
 
Zoo_View said:
Do you think their replacements will be improvements?
Click to expand...
Yeah, the replacements will be no better

When you are firing "only the best " how could anyone think the 2nd best will be better ?

The new ( temporary) AG is a case in point:

www.rawstory.com

'From bad to worse': Trump's new AG stuns as he stumbles over basic Epstein question

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche startled some political analysts and observers on Thursday when he flubbed a softball question about the Jeffrey Epstein files. Blanche was asked whether the public would learn the identities of the men who abused young women that are mentioned in the Epstein...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
 
Ramrouser said:
Trump’s 2.0 team won’t turn on him.
Click to expand...
What an odd thing to say. First, it implicitly concedes there is presently some basis for turning on Trump. Second, it implies the "1.0 team" handpicked by Trump found reason to turn on him. Third, it concedes that Trump did a poor job choosing the "1.0 team." Fourth, it presumes without explanation that whatever mistakes Trump made in choosing the "1.0 team" will not be repeated with the "2.0 team." Fifth, it suggests the cabinet's allegiance is to Donald Trump rather than the Constitution of the United States of America, oath of office and history of the nation notwithstanding.
 
It was just a statement of fact regarding his 2.0 team. You can interpret it as you wish.

Y'alls predictions of Trump's demise due to Iran is just the 2026 version of BOMBSHELL: "the walls are closing in on the President." We've traveling down this path many times.
 
nycfan said:


🎁 https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy...0?st=DMg2ay&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
Click to expand...

“On Wednesday morning, Attorney General Pam Bondi descended the sun-splashed steps of the White House with President Trump, smiling at him just before entering the presidential limousine for a two-mile ride to the Supreme Court.

It was on that short ride in “The Beast” when Bondi learned she was being removed from her job.

During the drive, Trump told her, “I think it’s time,” she would later tell an associate.

The ensuing hours were as awkward and chaotic as Bondi’s 14-month tenure as the nation’s top law-enforcement official. Trump and Bondi briefly sat near each other during the Supreme Court hearing on birthright citizenship, but the president soon switched chairs.

Later, Bondi would ask Trump if she could keep her job until the summer. The president declined.…”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top