College Football Catch-All Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 24K
  • Sports 
Committee got it wrong. SMU should be in, but Bama should be in over Indiana. Name Indiana's best win?
 
SMU beat Pitt who was 18 when they played and LVille who was 22 when they played.
Indiana didn't play anybody ranked all year except Ohio State

Again, what's Indiana's best win?
Who cares neither played or beat anyone worth a shit and neither has a chance in hell of winning the cfp
 
Who cares neither played or beat anyone worth a shit and neither has a chance in hell of winning the cfp
no ones arguing that. we were arguing who belongs in. Indiana was a feel good story because they always suck and a first year coach won a bunch of games in a perfect schedule against very few teams with even a winning record. the committee lost it. Indiana should not be in.
 
no ones arguing that. we were arguing who belongs in. Indiana was a feel good story because they always suck and a first year coach won a bunch of games in a perfect schedule against very few teams with even a winning record. the committee lost it. Indiana should not be in.
I'm for any outcome where Bama fans feel screwed and they whine all over the internet.

If it took Indiana being in for that to happen, I'm ok with it.
 
no ones arguing that. we were arguing who belongs in. Indiana was a feel good story because they always suck and a first year coach won a bunch of games in a perfect schedule against very few teams with even a winning record. the committee lost it. Indiana should not be in.
Thats nothing more than your opinion. Too bad the experts disagree with you.

Someone is always going to feel slighted theres no perfection equation to it.

Again.....not going to matter one bit neither will be in the champ game.
 
Thats nothing more than your opinion. Too bad the experts disagree with you.

Someone is always going to feel slighted theres no perfection equation to it.

Again.....not going to matter one bit neither will be in the champ game.
This is a message board full of nothing but opinions. You continue to dodge why Indiana should be in and try to shift to, "it doesn't matter." You haven't made any argument for why Indiana should be in over anyone else. It's ok.
 
Why am I not surprised that you’re a shill for Alabama and the playoff committee.
I have no horse in this race. I just don’t believe SMU is at that level and the ACC isn’t worthy of 2 bids.

Bama did enough wrong to get left out but SMU is a fraud.
 
I'm for any outcome where Bama fans feel screwed and they whine all over the internet.

If it took Indiana being in for that to happen, I'm ok with it.
As Saban stated these types of decisions discourage teams playing tough games which is not in the best interest of CFB.

Is better to lose to a Top 10 team or beat a bottom 50 team?
 
I'd you lose 3 you shouldn't be in.

Maybe don't load up your conference with the best teams.
The number of loses on their own shouldn’t matter. It’s the body of work relative to every other team.
 
Last edited:
As Saban stated these types of decisions discourage teams playing tough games which is not in the best interest of CFB.

Is better to lose to a Top 10 team or beat a bottom 50 team?
Bama’s OOC schedule was pretty mediocre and had nothing to do with them being left out of the CFP.

As the SEC & B1G have taken the best teams from other conferences, they don’t get to also whine about how tough their conference schedules are compared to others unless you’re a little bitch school.
 
Bama’s OOC schedule was pretty mediocre and had nothing to do with them being left out of the CFP.

As the SEC & B1G have taken the best teams from other conferences, they don’t get to also whine about how tough their conference schedules are compared to others unless you’re a little bitch school.
That’a a different discussion I think but it feels like CFB is kind of living in 2 worlds right now.

I lose no sleep over Bama being snubbed I’m just not sure SMU is more deserving.
 
Back
Top