- Messages
- 4,381
Mine too, but I don't feel nearly as well represented as when Jeff Jackson was my rep.That’s my rep!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mine too, but I don't feel nearly as well represented as when Jeff Jackson was my rep.That’s my rep!
Not that it matters, but I haven't seen it reported that they were all existing members.You know, those people all joined the groups before the SPLC paid them. The SPLC did not plant them. They offered them $$ to tell secrets.
No, but state and federal governments aren't non-profit organizations that profit from fighting an idea.As someone else asked you, do you know what an informant is? Here's a question for you to start. Law enforcement runs many informants. Are those informants criminals? Next question: how do they become informants? Third question: when law enforcement uses informants, do you say that law enforcement is creating crime?
A better comparison would be if Israel had informants/plants within Hamas/Hezbollah to relay information but what they actually did, at Israel's request, was stir up and encourage Hamas/Hezbollah to attack Israel to give Israel an excuse to counter attack.Or here's another question for you. Israel recently executed an operation where they apparently got Hezbollah leaders on a zoom call and then bombed this. This follows last year's coup where they sabotaged all those pagers. How do you think they did that? Was Israel also doing shady stuff? Were they creating terrorism in order to profit from it?
Same.Mine too, but I don't feel nearly as well represented as when Jeff Jackson was my rep.
The Mathematician in Chief. You didn’t even get the first part right, Don/Robert.
The Mathematician in Chief. You didn’t even get the first part right, Don/Robert.
The Mathematician in Chief. You didn’t even get the first part right, Don/Robert.
The first part, $100 to $600, is (whoops) almost correct at 600% (actually it's 500%), but it's 83.3% decrease (600-100)/600)x100% in price. A 100% decrease would mean it's free.That's not how math works.
From 100 to 600 is a 500% increase.The first part, $100 to $600, is correct at 600%, but it's 83.3% decrease (600-100)/600)x100% in price. A 100% decrease would mean it's free.
Thanks, I had edited my comment just a moment ago.From 100 to 600 is a 500% increase.
GTFOHnon-profit organizations that profit from fighting an idea.