CURRENT EVENTS February | Cartel Uprising in Mexico

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 20K
  • Politics 
Yeah, the exclamation points are a bit much. I don't know if that's his normal style or if he was just having some fun.

The analysis is solid, in the same way that contending 1+1=2 is solid. DOJ never presented a serious argument, nor could they do so because the retaliation was obvious. I mean, they announced that it was retaliation. Even a currently serving service member would probably not be permissibly disciplined for it, but definitely not a retired service member.
There is not a lot of precedent for this kind of case (for good reasons) so that makes it like 1 + 1 = 2 only if no one had ever thought to ask what 1 + 1 equals. There were certainly enough legal uncertainty and discretionary legal theories that a judge, if he or she were so inclined, could have denied a PI. Fortunately, this case was not before Judge Cannon, Kaczmarek, Alito or Thomas.
 
There is a 75% chance she was falling down drunk at the time. But even if she wasn't drunk at the time, then how is she going to prove that her fall caused a bruising to her brain ?

Prima facie evidence shows that her brain has been bruised for decades.
This dumbass administration has bruised my brain on a daily basis for over a year now. Thinking I might sue for $10 billion. It's basically precedent now, right?
 
Back
Top