CURRENT EVENTS General | March

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 312
  • Views: 6K
  • Politics 

“…
According to the shared screenshots, the conversation between Lang and the fake girl—whom he referred to as “baby” and “sweetie”—dated back to at least November. But it began to accelerate in early February as Lang tried to nail down the girl’s exact age.

“I might be too young for u lol,” the decoy wrote.

“How old are you bby?” Lang responded, adding “unless you are under 18 I don’t care haha.”

“i’m 15 lol,” the underage persona wrote back, adding a clothed picture of her body.

Having just set his age minimum at 18, Lang, age 30, responded: “When do you turn 16?”

“In 6 months,” she replied.

At this point, the pedophile-hunter, posing as the teenager, attempted to assure Lang.

“I won’t get u introuble [sic] if that’s what u r worried about I can keep a secret,” the decoy wrote back.

Lang “hearted” the message.

“What state do you live in?” he asked. “I can’t see you til your 16.”…”
 

66% of the current Supreme Court justices are Catholic. Hegseth’s preacher should work on a court packing plan to minimize the Catholic influence. Adding some more Jewish and Protestant justices - maybe 10 or so - sounds good to me.
 
66% of the current Supreme Court justices are Catholic. Hegseth’s preacher should work on a court packing plan to minimize the Catholic influence. Adding some more Jewish and Protestant justices - maybe 10 or so - sounds good to me.
They're afraid that the Protestants and the Jews may decide to listen to the Bible and not the Pope on abortion. An idle fear, imo.

Hegseth's preacher's real complaint is that he doesn't have the Pope's power or legitimacy.
 
IMG_5686.jpeg


“…
In a blistering 27-page decision unsealed on Friday, the judge, James E. Boasberg, derided the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, led by the Trump loyalist Jeanine Pirro, for pursuing a case against Mr. Powell when it appeared that the only reason prosecutors had to do so was President Trump’s desire to seek vengeance against the Fed chair. Mr. Powell has long resisted calls from the White House to adjust interest rates for political reasons.

“There is abundant evidence that the subpoenas’ dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the president or to resign and make way for a Fed Chair who will,” Judge Boasberg wrote. “On the other side of the scale, the government has offered no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the president.”…”
 
“… The laboratory, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, has been targeted for months by the Trump administration.

In a social media post in December, Russell Vought, the White House budget director, called the Colorado center “one of the largest sources of climate alarmism in the country.”

The center, founded in 1960, is responsible for many of the biggest scientific advances in understanding of weather and climate. Its research aircraft and sophisticated computer models of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans are widely used in forecasting weather events and disasters.

Scientists say the move to dismantle the center would weaken research that is crucial to understanding the atmosphere, space and oceans, air pollution and climate change. It would leave emergency officials and planners less prepared for extreme weather events, critics said.…”
 
“… The laboratory, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, has been targeted for months by the Trump administration.

In a social media post in December, Russell Vought, the White House budget director, called the Colorado center “one of the largest sources of climate alarmism in the country.”

The center, founded in 1960, is responsible for many of the biggest scientific advances in understanding of weather and climate. Its research aircraft and sophisticated computer models of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans are widely used in forecasting weather events and disasters.

Scientists say the move to dismantle the center would weaken research that is crucial to understanding the atmosphere, space and oceans, air pollution and climate change. It would leave emergency officials and planners less prepared for extreme weather events, critics said.…”
 
Back
Top