This story - like so many others - makes me think that perhaps our political world might be improved if everyone were somehow "forced" to understand and contemplate a single story involving the current POTUS.
The professionals at the Smithsonian are at the top tier of an incredibly competitive profession.
Meanwhile, there is a huge amount of information to absorb and communicate to the public about the history of slavery, as studied in a host of different disciplines.
It seems as if Trump and his people are upset when the museum folks (and the history departments etc.) present the history of slavery as unpleasant. Or, perhaps they are just upset when they feel that too much attention is spent on blacks in exhibits and/or classrooms.
This conversation invites some obvious followup questions:
- Has Donald Trump ever read a book about slavery?
- Have any of his people ever read a book about slavery? Which ones? How many?
- Do MAGA folks hear what Trump says and somehow agree that those museum folks are pushing a "liberal agenda" about slavery? What would that be?
- Have MAGA people studied slavery?
This strikes me as yet another example where the MAGA movt and Trump are against folks who know things, That includes folks who work on diseases and vaccinations, folks who work on global waming, folks who study crime and crime patterns, folks who study history incliuding the institution of slavery,
These people just celebrate their ignorance.
But what percentage of voters really share these opinions? No deference to expertise?