Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

CURRENT EVENTS July 6 - *



“…
Homan said he was unsure of the status of the eight men — or whether they are detained there — saying that they are no longer in U.S. custody.

“They’re living in Sudan. And will they stay in Sudan? I don’t know,” he said. “When we sign these agreements with all these countries, we make arrangements to make sure these countries are receiving these people and there’s opportunities for these people. But I can’t tell if we remove somebody to Sudan — they can stay there a week and leave. I don’t know.”…”

This is unbelievable. And it’s shocking to me that we have Americans citizens who either cheer this on or just don’t care.
 
Not a fan of ICE, but I don't see a problem with this guidance. There are professional agitators that are very intelligent and who prepare heavily for these events. Same people that we saw in 2020. Unlike the morons who livestreamed themselves storming the capitol building, these individuals take great lengths to conceal their identities.
Of course you don’t see a problem with it. You don’t believe police are capable of violating the law while conducting their duties.
 
The autocratic conversion of the US continues.


The Department of Homeland Security is urging local police to consider a wide range of protest activity as violent tactics, including mundane acts like riding a bike or livestreaming a police encounter, WIRED has learned.

Threat bulletins issued during last month’s “No Kings” protests warn that the US government’s aggressive immigration raids are almost certain to accelerate domestic unrest, with DHS saying there’s a “high likeliness” more Americans will soon turn against the agency, which could trigger confrontations near federal sites.



Blaming intense media coverage and backlash to the US military deployment in Los Angeles, DHS expects the demonstrations to “continue and grow across the nation” as protesters focused on other issues shift to immigration, following a broad “embracement of anti-ICE messaging.”


The bulletins—first obtained by the national security nonprofit Property of the People through public records requests—warn that officers could face assaults with fireworks and improvised weapons: paint-filled fire extinguishers, smoke grenades, and projectiles like bottles and rocks.

At the same time, the guidance urges officers to consider a range of nonviolent behavior and common protest gear—like masks, flashlights, and cameras—as potential precursors to violence, telling officers to prepare “from the point of view of an adversary.”


Protesters on bicycles, skateboards, or even “on foot” are framed as potential “scouts” conducting reconnaissance or searching for “items to be used as weapons.” Livestreaming is listed alongside “doxxing” as a “tactic” for “threatening” police. Online posters are cast as ideological recruiters—or as participants in “surveillance sharing.”

One list of “violent tactics” shared by the Los Angeles–based Joint Regional Intelligence Center—part of a post-9/11 fusion network—includes both protesters’ attempts to avoid identification and efforts to identify police. The memo also alleges that face recognition, normally a tool of law enforcement, was used against officers.

Vera Eidelman, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, says the government has no business treating constitutionally protected activities—like observing or documenting police—as threats.


DHS did not respond to a request for comment.
If you’re at a protest, film everything you can. Hell, livestream it.
 
Patel and Noem are polygraphing senior officials to determine who is saying bad things about them.

and so it goes in the march to autocracy...

 
Of course you don’t see a problem with it. You don’t believe police are capable of violating the law while conducting their duties.

Not true at all. That's unfair, and would be the same as me saying "you don't believe that protesters have ever broken the law or caused violence".
 
I agree with this. I also agree that protesters should not be allowed to wear masks that conceal their identity.
Fuck that. If you can imprison me at a black site, without ever stating your name, agency, or the charge then I say every single mass action should look like this:
1752240374809.jpeg
I grew up almost entirely with kids of cops and firefighters, most of which became cops and firefighters. For all the first responder do gooder vibes, the majority really are just boot heelers. They should have concern if the public is aligning against their authoritarian fascist behavior.
 
Not true at all. That's unfair, and would be the same as me saying "you don't believe that protesters have ever broken the law or caused violence".
Not true at all. That's unfair, and would be the same as me saying "you don't believe that protesters have ever broken the law or caused violence".
One side has taken a sworn oath to uphold the law and protect citizens. Let's not go all Vietnam in America and decide "WE had to destroy that village to save it." That's BS.
 
Fuck that. If you can imprison me at a black site, without ever stating your name, agency, or the charge then I say every single mass action should look like this:
1752240374809.jpeg
I grew up almost entirely with kids of cops and firefighters, most of which became cops and firefighters. For all the first responder do gooder vibes, the majority really are just boot heelers. They should have concern if the public is aligning against their authoritarian fascist behavior.

The people wearing masks to conceal their identity generally aren't normal members of the "public". They are professional agitators/rioters who are concealing their identity because they intend to commit criminal acts and don't want to be caught. Protesting is protected free speech; rioting is not.
 
One side has taken a sworn oath to uphold the law and protect citizens. Let's not go all Vietnam in America and decide "WE had to destroy that village to save it." That's BS.
I don't think there are "sides" here. The overwhelming majority of cops are just people trying to do their jobs, and the overwhelming majority of protesters for any cause are just people trying to express their opinions in a lawful manner. The problems come from the extremists within both groups, neither of whom should be defended or protected from the consequences of their actions.
 
The people wearing masks to conceal their identity generally aren't normal members of the "public". They are professional agitators/rioters who are concealing their identity because they intend to commit criminal acts and don't want to be caught. Protesting is protected free speech; rioting is not.
Show some proof of this assertion
 
Trump Admin focusing on Chemtrail conspiracy theories — at least mostly debunking them.

 
I don't think there are "sides" here. The overwhelming majority of cops are just people trying to do their jobs, and the overwhelming majority of protesters for any cause are just people trying to express their opinions in a lawful manner. The problems come from the extremists within both groups, neither of whom should be defended or protected from the consequences of their actions.
Maybe "normal" cops although the rate of shooting deaths by sheriffs in rural areas continue to rise, but the type of people joining ICE with the speed of hiring, the lack of vetting and the administrative approach makes me extremely skeptical that we're not putting thugs on the street.

We certainly didn't need to spend that kind of money or focus so much on such a flimsy issue as immigration. There's been a hell of a lot more claims about issues than demonstrable issues.
 
Back
Top