- Messages
- 29,415
“… While the Army Rangers, Green Berets and Navy SEALS have always required equal fitness test thresholds, the Army and the Marines, for instance, do not. As of the end of 2022, women—who had been banned from combat roles until 2013—comprised 17.5 percent of the active duty force, according to the Defense Department.
Hegseth’s order also requires military leaders to determine which are combat roles and which are not—an issue that may not be clear-cut.“
Background:
Standards for the Army were adjusted in 2022 after a Rand Corp study of expanded requirements implemented in 2019 were harder for women and older men to pass without actually predicting combat job performance:

Army eases fitness test standards for women, older troops
The Army has scrapped its move to have a physical fitness test that's gender- and age-neutral, and will now allow women and older soldiers to pass while meeting some reduced standards.

“After three years of complaints and debate, the Army has scrapped its move to have a physical fitness test that is gender- and age-neutral, and will now allow women and older soldiers to pass while meeting some reduced standards.
The decision comes after a study by the RAND research organization confirmed that men were passing the new six-event fitness test at a much higher rate than women and that older soldiers were also struggling with their scores in the expanded, more difficult test developed in 2019.
The change, however, will affect only the regular fitness test that soldiers take annually. Qualifying for certain Army jobs, particularly more demanding combat positions or specialties such as Ranger school, will continue to require that everyone — regardless of age or gender — must pass the same fitness tests and standards.
… The new program [in 2022] also brings the Army back in line with the other military services, which have varying fitness tests, but all use tiered event requirements based on age and gender.
Hardison said the RAND study, which included analysis of about 460,000 soldiers’ tests, concluded there was limited evidence showing that the resulting scores accurately predicted combat job performance or that doing well led to reduced injuries —- two reasons the changes were made in the first place.
Overall, RAND said the test was better used to assess a soldier’s general physical fitness, and not to predict job performance, and that using a tiered scale for passing scores made the test less punitive. …”