CURRENT EVENTS — NOVEMBER

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 875
  • Views: 17K
  • Politics 
1763495609067.png

1763495269719.png

Edit: Rachel Maddow did a segment just last night on how counterproductive the DOJ and affiliated Trump amateur hour lawyers are to Trumps cause.
 
Last edited:

Trump dismisses Marjorie Taylor Greene’s claim his attacks put her in danger, tells female reporter ‘quiet, quiet piggy’​

 
Here's a pretty good summary of Judge Brown's career. I appeared before him back when he was a State District Court judge here in Houston. And our firm always liked seeing him on an appellate panel when he was on the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston.

I have now read the opinion and I'm no lawyer, but to me that appears to be a quite sound and thorough bit of legal analysis.

I read it as saying "The Supreme court has spent years trying to undermine the VRA by claiming race based districting is unconstitutional, and now that's the law of the land, and this is a clear-as-day case of race based redistricting, so we gotta pull the plug on this."

And regardless of all that, I think the republicans are dodging a bullet here. Creating 4 or 5 new Hispanic majority districts might have sounded like a good idea at the time, but Trump's favorability among Hispanics has plunged a full 40 points since February. Somebody would have to run the numbers, but I'm not convinced the 2025 maps provide a better outcome for Republicans than the 2021 ones do in light of that fact.
 
Last edited:
I have now read the opinion and I'm no lawyer, but to me that appears to be a quite sound and thorough bit of legal analysis.

I read it as saying "The Supreme court has spent years trying to undermine the VRA by claiming race based districting is unconstitutional, and now that's the law of the land, and this is a clear-as-day case of race based redistricting, so we gotta pull the plug on this."

And regardless of all that, I think the republicans are dodging a bullet here. Creating 4 or 5 new Hispanic majority districts might have sounded like a good idea at the time, but Trump'd favorability among Hispanics has plunged a full 40 points since February. Somebody would have to run the numbers, but I'm not convinced the 2025 maps provide a better outcome for Republicans than the 2021 ones do in light of that fact.
I think I heard or read somewhere that a +8 gain for the Dems compared to 2024 would put several of those gerrymandered districts at serious risk of flipping. +8 seems very doable right now, especially in a place like Texas given the ~40 point swing among Latinos.
 
I have now read the opinion and I'm no lawyer, but to me that appears to be a quite sound and thorough bit of legal analysis.

I read it as saying "The Supreme court has spent years trying to undermine the VRA by claiming race based districting is unconstitutional, and now that's the law of the land, and this is a clear-as-day case of race based redistricting, so we gotta pull the plug on this."

And regardless of all that, I think the republicans are dodging a bullet here. Creating 4 or 5 new Hispanic majority districts might have sounded like a good idea at the time, but Trump'd favorability among Hispanics has plunged a full 40 points since February. Somebody would have to run the numbers, but I'm not convinced the 2025 maps provide a better outcome for Republicans than the 2021 ones do in light of that fact.
There is no bullet dodging. The Supreme Court will stay this injunction and the new Texas maps will be used.
 
And regardless of all that, I think the republicans are dodging a bullet here. Creating 4 or 5 new Hispanic majority districts might have sounded like a good idea at the time, but Trump'd favorability among Hispanics has plunged a full 40 points since February. Somebody would have to run the numbers, but I'm not convinced the 2025 maps provide a better outcome for Republicans than the 2021 ones do in light of that fact.
I was fully expecting the TX plan to backfire, at least in part. Spreading mean margins of victory more thinly is not likely a winning hand under the current circumstances.
 
I think I heard or read somewhere that a +8 gain for the Dems compared to 2024 would put several of those gerrymandered districts at serious risk of flipping. +8 seems very doable right now, especially in a place like Texas given the ~40 point swing among Latinos.
That's what I used to think. But then I looked at the numbers and I'm not sure dummymanders really exist? At worst, the gerrymander might fail, in that the created districts will actually be competitive, but I don't think gerrymandering carries much risk of actually backfiring. That's what computer technology and micro-grainy data can do. I mean, I didn't do an exhaustive study or anything, but I'm less convinced that gerrymanders are unstable.
 

Trump dismisses Marjorie Taylor Greene’s claim his attacks put her in danger, tells female reporter ‘quiet, quiet piggy’​

Stay classless, Benito Cheeto.
 
There is no bullet dodging. The Supreme Court will stay this injunction and the new Texas maps will be used.
Issuing a stay here would involve apocalyptical levels of hypocrisy. Plus, to me that opinion read like a 160 page buttoning up of arguments to prevent that sort of thing.

I'm sure not putting it past the Supreme Court to do anything, but frankly I'd be surprised.
 
Issuing a stay here would involve apocalyptical levels of hypocrisy. Plus, to me that opinion read like a 160 page buttoning up of arguments to prevent that sort of thing.

I'm sure not putting it past the Supreme Court to do anything, but frankly I'd be surprised.
I’ll take a bet on it. Any amount up to $1000.
 

Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas declared on Tuesday that one of the nation’s largest Muslim advocacy and civil rights groups is a foreign terrorist organization, saying the move will prohibit the organization from acquiring land in Texas and authorize the state attorney general “to sue to shut them down” in Texas.

In his declaration, Mr. Abbott said that the group, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, had direct ties to Hamas, which has been designated as a terrorist group by the U.S. government. The nonprofit, known by its initials, CAIR, has denied having any such ties.

The governor also suggested, without offering evidence, that CAIR’s leadership sought to impose Islamic law, known as Shariah, on Americans.
 

Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas declared on Tuesday that one of the nation’s largest Muslim advocacy and civil rights groups is a foreign terrorist organization, saying the move will prohibit the organization from acquiring land in Texas and authorize the state attorney general “to sue to shut them down” in Texas.

In his declaration, Mr. Abbott said that the group, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, had direct ties to Hamas, which has been designated as a terrorist group by the U.S. government. The nonprofit, known by its initials, CAIR, has denied having any such ties.

The governor also suggested, without offering evidence, that CAIR’s leadership sought to impose Islamic law, known as Shariah, on Americans.
And these assholes wonder why the alt right feels empowered to be overtly antisemitic.
 
Hosting Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President Trump brushed off the murder of Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi agents, saying, “Things happen.”

 

Trump dismisses Marjorie Taylor Greene’s claim his attacks put her in danger, tells female reporter ‘quiet, quiet piggy’​

My wife found out that the reporter he called piggy is the younger sister of her high school classmate. She is the chief WH correspondent for ABC.
 
Back
Top