CURRENT EVENTS

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 680
  • Views: 10K
  • Politics 
Callatoroy said:
Ok. Disprove that article then. Or do you only follow facts that suit your agenda? Which is really the case.
Click to expand...

I have no desire to prove or disprove whatever article you're referring to. I'm sure it's shit. I'm simply stating a fact about the current state of the republican party. If you guys hear something you don't like, if you get information, like say, an unfavorable jobs report, you guys just fire the INDEPENDENT labor chief and make shit up. You've made shit up about the border, Hurricane Helene, California wildfires, etc etc. You're just completely FOS WRT to everything. You hate everything about America and what it was intended to be.
 
Huh? said:
How does that make me a hypocrite? If I'm weak, devoid of policy and willing to buy votes, why wouldn't i try to flood the country with non-voters? You can't even keep your gratuitous insults straight - it's like you have NewsMax Tourette's.

I similarly accuse the GOP of actively suppressing votes because they'd lose every election if every citizen voted. But I'm not accusing them of hypocrisy, you stupid twit.
Click to expand...
You are weak minded, devoid of policy, rely on entitlement vote buying, and did try to flood the country with illegal immigrants. You are a hypocrite because you act as if your party is sitting on some fake moral high ground when you are every bit as scummy you accuse pubs of being.

Only a stupid twit would think asking for an id to vote and wanting minimize the chance of voter fraud = voter suppression. Just further proof that you are weak minded, devoid of policy, and have to rely on buying votes to win an election.
 
nycfan said:




Click to expand...

It's horrible and frightening, but no surprise. Pete Hegseth has a long history as a drunk womanizer and, like so many Trumpers, has all the morals of a stray alley cat. That he should support this guy, attend his "church", and send his own kid to a "Christian" school run by him is actually rather fitting. And this guy is about as much of a "Christian" as Jerry Falwell, Jr., Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, and all of the other False Prophets, scam artists, moral frauds and hypocrites, bigots and sexists, and all of the other worthies of the Religious Right. This guy has likely cheated on his spouse and privately engaged in all sorts of behavior that he publicly preaches and fulminates against. The bottom line is that not only is Trump a terrible excuse for a decent human being, so are most of the people he's appointed to his second administration. It's a clown show of incompetent loons, scam artists, drunks and drug addicts, wannabe fascists, sexual harassers and abusers, you name it. Why should their "spiritual and religious" advisors be any different?
 
dukeman92 said:
I have no desire to prove or disprove whatever article you're referring to. I'm sure it's shit. I'm simply stating a fact about the current state of the republican party. If you guys hear something you don't like, if you get information, like say, an unfavorable jobs report, you guys just fire the INDEPENDENT labor chief and make shit up. You've made shit up about the border, Hurricane Helene, California wildfires, etc etc. You're just completely FOS WRT to everything. You hate everything about America and what it was intended to be.
Click to expand...
or maybe the jobs report was wrong. You have no clue other than you want to believe it was right. What type of grass do you prefer to graze on?
 
Mulberry Heel said:
It's horrible and frightening, but no surprise. Pete Hegseth has a long history as a drunk womanizer and, like so many Trumpers, has all the morals of a stray alley cat. That he should support this guy, attend his "church", and send his own kid to a "Christian" school run by him is actually rather fitting. And this guy is about as much of a "Christian" as Jerry Falwell, Jr., Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, and all of the other False Prophets, scam artists, moral frauds and hypocrites, bigots and sexists, and all of the other worthies of the Religious Right. This guy has likely cheated on his spouse and privately engaged in all sorts of behavior that he publicly preaches and fulminates against. The bottom line is that not only is Trump a terrible excuse for a decent human being, so are most of the people he's appointed to his second administration. It's a clown show of incompetent loons, scam artists, drunks and drug addicts, wannabe fascists, sexual harassers and abusers, you name it. Why should their "spiritual and religious" advisors be any different?
Click to expand...
What direction have the recruitment numbers taken?
 
Callatoroy said:
Seats are added or lost based on population. Flooding sanctuary states with millions of illegals and then counting them in the census adds more congressional seats. How is that not rigging the system? What is the logic in counting them when they can't vote? For purposes of voter representation they might as well be gold fish because like gold fish they can't vote. So no logical reason to count them in the census to determine the number of congressional seats.
Click to expand...
total agree and this is why we shouldn't count children
 
nycfan said:
Click to expand...

Back when Reagan was still in office and was blathering about a missile defense program, there was an article about it in the "New Yorker" magazine. The article started off discussing a WW2 plan to make the guns on US bombers radar and computer controlled, so as to eliminate the always messy and inefficient human element. This grand plan was set aside when the "eggheads" finally convinced the "General LeMays" of the Army Air Corps that given the desired level of accuracy the "General LeMays" predicted could be achieved with radar control, these radar-controlled guns would shoot down ten American bombers for each enemy fighter they shot down. It was just that there were so many bombers clumped together, flying straight and level and so few fighters that were zigzagging and twisting around. and amidst them. And that fundamental problem of there being so many more targets in the air that you don't want to hit and so few targets in the air that you do want to hit has still, to my understanding, not been solved. And another thing that hasn't changed, dim-witted Republican politicians still don't understand the magnitude of the targeting problem.

If we want a missile defense program that includes launch tracking stations in South Korea and multiple lines of Navy ships and ground installations armed with missiles designed to intercept North Korean missiles, we can do that. If we want a missile defense program to intercept a single missile that was accidently launched and the country that launched it is cooperating, we can do that. But the technology that would successfully thwart a full-scale missile attack from either Russia or China is so sophisticated, that developing it would be akin to spending money in WW2 to thwart a horse-mounted charge from the German Equestrian Corps. The level of technology needed to make such a missile defense system work is so advanced as to strongly suggest that parallel developments in offensive technology would have long ago assigned intercontinental ballistic missiles to the dust bin of history.
 
Callatoroy said:
or maybe the jobs report was wrong. You have no clue other than you want to believe it was right. What type of grass do you prefer to graze on?
Click to expand...

The jobs report wasn't wrong. And deep down, you know that. Even if you won't admit it. Just like you know this chaotic administration is ruining this country... but you're too proud and in too deep to ever admit fault. Fortunately your vote is on record, and long after we're dust and this generation is studied in classrooms, your ancestors will marvel at how stupid you were and wonder how you allowed yourself to be duped by a conman with a combover.
 
Callatoroy said:
Only a stupid twit would think asking for an id to vote and wanting minimize the chance of voter fraud = voter suppression. Just further proof that you are weak minded, devoid of policy, and have to rely on buying votes to win an election.
Click to expand...

As many as 34 million voting-age Americans don't have a valid governmental ID. What alternative do you propose other than to disenfranchise them?

Univ of Maryland voting study
 
Callatoroy said:
You are a hypocrite because you act as if your party is sitting on some fake moral high ground
Click to expand...
How is it hypocritical to act like your moral high ground is fake?
I guess you are saying the democrats have a real moral high ground? Nice of you to admit that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top