CURRENT EVENTS

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 924
  • Views: 16K
  • Politics 
Over/under on this upcoming tweet: "I know RJ; he's a great guy, he loves Trump. It's so unfair; it's a Democrat which hunt hoax, and I know I'm allowed to give him a pardon and we're looking at that. I'll let you know in a couple weeks. It's such a dis-grace."
 
Last edited:


[don’t Google the book on a work device — it’s pretty awful racist and antisemitic stuff]

It's pretty obvious that ICE is a completely corrupt and white nationalist organization under Trump. If we manage to survive this period in our nation, it's also pretty obvious that ICE will have to be completely shut down and a new government agency created to handle the immigration and customs enforcement.

It seems perfectly logical to me that, in doing so, you'd bar any former ICE employees (or those employed during certain dates) from being hired within the "New ICE" organization that would be constructed. Is that legal? If so, could you also legally bar those former ICE employees from being employed in any type of law enforcement role?
 
It seems perfectly logical to me that, in doing so, you'd bar any former ICE employees (or those employed during certain dates) from being hired within the "New ICE" organization that would be constructed. Is that legal? If so, could you also legally bar those former ICE employees from being employed in any type of law enforcement role?
I can't see any reason why that would be beyond a legislative power. It is definitely within the executive's power but that wouldn't be permanent.
 


Hey, look everybody! The Grand Old Perverts are pedophilin’ again!

Ram, what is with your people?

We now seem to be getting at least one of these stories every single week - a Trumper "traditional family values" politician or Religious Right preacher/leader or MAGA celebrity getting caught doing exactly what they preach against. It's like clockwork now.
 
It's pretty obvious that ICE is a completely corrupt and white nationalist organization under Trump. If we manage to survive this period in our nation, it's also pretty obvious that ICE will have to be completely shut down and a new government agency created to handle the immigration and customs enforcement.

It seems perfectly logical to me that, in doing so, you'd bar any former ICE employees (or those employed during certain dates) from being hired within the "New ICE" organization that would be constructed. Is that legal? If so, could you also legally bar those former ICE employees from being employed in any type of law enforcement role?
The #1 campaign issue for Dems at the national level should be immediate termination of all employees of ICE and abolition of the Dept of Homeland Security.
 
Does Trump know the Heritage Foundation is a think tank?




A person that full of shit AND dumb should not find success in life. Yes, they ought to be provided with sustenance and a general level of comfort through their efforts in daily life but barring luck they should live th


From March

 
IMG_0380.jpeg

Irony in a Facebook feed…


White House to Vet Smithsonian Museums to Fit Trump's Historical Vision; Top White House officials will scrutinize exhibitions, internal processes, collections and artist grants ahead of America's 250th anniversary​

McGraw, Meridith



The White House plans to conduct a far-reaching review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions, materials and operations ahead of America's 250th anniversary to ensure the museums align with President Trump's interpretation of American history .

In a letter sent to Lonnie Bunch, the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, three top White House officials said they want to ensure the museums present the "unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story" and reflect the president's executive order calling for "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History."

Areas under scrutiny range from public-facing exhibition text and online content to internal curatorial processes, exhibition planning, the use of collections and artist grants.

"This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the president's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions," the letter states.

The letter, dated Tuesday, Aug. 12, and viewed by The Wall Street Journal, was signed by White House senior associate Lindsey Halligan, the director of the domestic policy council, Vince Haley, and the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vought.

"This is about preserving trust in one of our most cherished institutions," Halligan said in a statement. "The Smithsonian museums and exhibits should be accurate, patriotic, and enlightening—ensuring they remain places of learning, wonder, and national pride for generations to come."

"The Smithsonian's work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history," the Smithsonian said. "We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents."

The White House review of the Smithsonian's extensive collection of art and historical artifacts comes as the president has sought to reorient the country's cultural institutions, including top universities , and demonstrates Trump's efforts to recast parts of American history in a more positive light.

The Smithsonian's Board of Regents agreed to conduct a thorough review of all its museum and zoo content to eliminate political influence and bias, the Journal previously reported.

Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, said the White House's effort was an affront to the historians and curators trained to ensure historical accuracy.

"If those things are taken out of the hands of historians, the public stands to lose a great deal in having reliable and engaging content that tells a whole and complex story of the American past," she said.

The president singled out the Smithsonian Institution in his executive order and said the Smithsonian had recently "come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology" that promotes "narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive." He directed Vice President JD Vance, a member of the Smithsonian Board of Regents, and senior officials to work with Congress to block the Smithsonian from receiving appropriations for exhibitions and programs that don't align with his opposition to initiatives that promote diversity, equity and inclusion.

Tiya Miles, a professor of history at Harvard University, said she was concerned that the Smithsonian would be asked to interpret history based on "one man's view" as opposed to scholarship and research.

"The Smithsonian museums have never reflected one person's view, or even one administration's view," Miles said. "They have reflected the composite research, analysis, discussion, findings of many different people, scholars and researchers."

The White House review will pay attention to exhibits planned for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Trump and his team, including Haley , have been intimately involved in the planning for America's 250th celebrations.

Following the review, the White House letter states that museums should make corrections that replace "divisive or ideologically driven" language with "unifying, historically accurate," public-facing materials.

The officials stated in the letter they don't intend to interfere with the "day-to-day operations of curators or staff" but want "to support a broader vision of excellence that highlights historically accurate, uplifting, and inclusive portrayals of America's heritage."

The details requested by the White House go beyond museum exhibitions and extend to organization charts, responses to visitor surveys, artists featured in galleries who have received a Smithsonian grant, a list of outside partners, and internal communications related to exhibit and artwork selection and approval. The museums are given 30 days to turn over requested materials for the initial request.

The White House laid out a timeline for the Smithsonian to tap a representative to work with the administration on 250th anniversary planning. A team from the White House will also be conducting observational visits and walk-throughs of current exhibits to document themes and messaging, and voluntary interviews with curators.

The review will focus on eight of the 19 Smithsonian museums based in Washington: National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African-American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.

The White House stated the review of Smithsonian museums is expected to wrap at the beginning of 2026, according to the letter.
 
Back
Top