superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 9,073
Impoundment has not been around in the US for centuries. The concept comes from the British royalty. The reason that impoundment is not workable in our system is that it makes it impossible for Congress to legislate on a bipartisan basis.1. Impoundment, which has been around for centuries, allows the president to refuse to spend money, right?
2. If we have a legal agreement/contract, I would agree. If not, why can't Trump legally impound money? Also, does the president have the power to stop funding, using impoundment, even if there is a contract in place?
For instance, if Trump were to be allowed to impound allocated funds he doesn't like, then how the fuck are Democrats supposed to negotiate? They can't get anything they want, because Trump won't spend it. And imagine what would happen with a Democratic Congress, or a split Congress. The legislature would lose all power, and the system would break completely.
Anyway, the constitution is very clear on this point. It's not an open question, except maybe in the hands of a lawless Supreme Court that pays little attention to the actual text or history of the constitution.