Economic News

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 134K
  • Politics 
re #2 : I am in that select company. I now own two residences because my current residence has not sold. I will be moving to my new primary residence in a few weeks and will continue to be the not so proud owner of two primary residences until this house sells😦
Are you working with a lender to offer rate buy downs? If not, you should probably be. If that's not something your listing agent is suggesting, you might want to ask them about it. In the current environment, that is far more effective than price reduction.
 
Walmart 2Q2 report is interesting...

missed on earnings
beat sales a bit
prices increased 1%
upper income consumers led the way in sales
increase grocery buys led the way in sales

My takeaway is even upper income folks are looking for lower prices and are willing to mix with the hoi polloi in order to avoid the spike in inflation. Consumers are seeing spikes in grocery prices and looking to Walmart for better grocery prices. The question is, between tariffs on grocery related imports and the loss of local immigrant farm workers due to mass deportation efforts, how long will Walmart groceries maintain an edge over retail grocers ?
Judging by their stocking issues and price increases, not that long. I go by about once a week, primarily because their baked goods are better in my opinion than most and a couple of other things like a coffee that I liked that they haven't had in six weeks. They are getting gaps on their shelves and some things seem to have been removed.
 
IMO, the upper income piece is a dangerous sign. If Walmart is relying on middle/upper middle to “beat sales a bit” but “miss on earnings”, lots of retailers are in trouble. Also, where are the lower income brackets going? We about to see a strong earnings report from Dollar General?
It will be interesting to see what the Wegmans and the Harris Teeters of the world report in sales. Though i guess HT gets buried in Kroger's data now.
 
I can tell you I am spending large sums of money at HT-compared to a few monts ago Part of that is buying tons of food for grandkids lol
 
Are you working with a lender to offer rate buy downs? If not, you should probably be. If that's not something your listing agent is suggesting, you might want to ask them about it. In the current environment, that is far more effective than price reduction.
This is a new concept for me. What is a rate buy down ?

We met with our agent two days ago to assess our situation. Our house has been on the market for 5 weeks in a neighborhood where houses were selling in a week a year ago. We thought that maybe the agent had overpriced our house given the current market post Trump election. The agent told us that houses in our area have been on the market an average of 8 weeks prior to selling and so we agreed to wait another 3 weeks before reducing the price.

But I am interested in learning about rate buy down offers as an alternative option.

Thanks
 
Americans filing claims for jobless benefits rose to 235,000 for the week of Aug. 15, the largest increase since late May. Economists expected 225,000 jobless claims to be filed.

Meanwhile, continuing claims jumped to 1.97 million, greater than the 1.96 million anticipated, in a sign that Americans without jobs are finding it difficult to get a new one.
 
Americans filing claims for jobless benefits rose to 235,000 for the week of Aug. 15, the largest increase since late May. Economists expected 225,000 jobless claims to be filed.

Meanwhile, continuing claims jumped to 1.97 million, greater than the 1.96 million anticipated, in a sign that Americans without jobs are finding it difficult to get a new one.
Are former federal workers showing up in these numbers yet? When those kick in, I expect a surge.

Nothing like planned sabotage of the economy. The republican way, no doubt.
 
This is a new concept for me. What is a rate buy down ?

We met with our agent two days ago to assess our situation. Our house has been on the market for 5 weeks in a neighborhood where houses were selling in a week a year ago. We thought that maybe the agent had overpriced our house given the current market post Trump election. The agent told us that houses in our area have been on the market an average of 8 weeks prior to selling and so we agreed to wait another 3 weeks before reducing the price.

But I am interested in learning about rate buy down offers as an alternative option.

Thanks
My guess is that the slowdown you have seen is indeed affordability driven...but more payment than actual price. Take a look at the below which would involve you as the seller paying $30k for a rate buydown rather than you taking a 30k price reduction. I just assumed a note of $500k but we can play with the numbers.

Now...let me go on record as saying I generally think buydowns are bad financial advice for most buyers and this kind of shit is propping up the market in dangerous ways...BUT in this case im putting my listing agent cap on and protecting you (the seller) from the perils of the current market.

By the way, next time call me. I may live in Cary and do 95% instruction, but I still take care of friends and family in Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. Anyone from here qualifies as friends and family.

1000008072.jpg
 
Related

The Home-Builder Heir Who Is Stoking the Jerome Powell Frenzy​

Trump’s freewheeling Federal Housing head Bill Pulte is waging an unorthodox social-media campaign to oust the Fed chair​


🎁 —> https://www.wsj.com/finance/bill-pu...0?st=MzDoLP&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

“… The 37-year-old FHFA chief, known to some as “Little Trump,” has recently inserted himself into the middle of the action, thanks to a relentless social-media campaign targeting Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. He even drafted a letter for President Trump to fire Powell. (Trump on Wednesday denied that he planned to, though didn’t rule it out entirely.) [He is also behind a new push to demand a Biden appointee to the federal resign that got Trump to post this today:


]

…Pulte, an heir of one of the largest home builders, has 3 million followers on X, after gaining popularity by giving away money using the platform. Like Trump, he regularly posts policy changes or ideas in real-time and airs frustrations. Shares of Fair Isaac Corp., also known as FICO, fell sharply earlier this year after Pulte said he was “not happy” with the credit-scoring firm.…”

This is all very rich coming from the man who probably has committed more fraud when it comes to property loans than any person in existence.
I thought the GOP battle cry around this type of activity was, “what’s the big deal? Everyone does it1 Victimless crime! This means I’m smart!”
 
This is all very rich coming from the man who probably has committed more fraud when it comes to property loans than any person in existence.
I thought the GOP battle cry around this type of activity was, “what’s the big deal? Everyone does it1 Victimless crime! This means I’m smart!”
This is correct. Large homebuilders commit more mortgage fraud in a day than the rest of the nation does in a year.
 
My guess is that the slowdown you have seen is indeed affordability driven...but more payment than actual price. Take a look at the below which would involve you as the seller paying $30k for a rate buydown rather than you taking a 30k price reduction. I just assumed a note of $500k but we can play with the numbers.

Now...let me go on record as saying I generally think buydowns are bad financial advice for most buyers and this kind of shit is propping up the market in dangerous ways...BUT in this case im putting my listing agent cap on and protecting you (the seller) from the perils of the current market.

By the way, next time call me. I may live in Cary and do 95% instruction, but I still take care of friends and family in Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. Anyone from here qualifies as friends and family.

1000008072.jpg
Yeesh, that’s a crap deal for the buyer. They are only getting about 77% of the value of that $30,000. But it’s a nice deal for the lender which is getting a prepayment of a portion of the interest for the first three years plus a significant premium of the interest they would have been paid this three years on the fixed monthly payment.
 
Yeesh, that’s a crap deal for the buyer. They are only getting about 77% of the value of that $30,000. But it’s a nice deal for the lender which is getting a prepayment of a portion of the interest for the first three years plus a significant premium of the interest they would have been paid this three years on the fixed monthly payment.
Yes

And for me a potential buyer for my house who is worried and wanting to reduce his monthly mortgage payment by a few bucks is not going to be in a financial position to buy my house.

That said I appreciate wmheel1287 reaching out to me and sharing his real estate expertise. Anything real estate related, I pay attention to his posts.
 
1. Only if you believe the Trump people. Why would you? Everything they say is a lie. Do we need to go through all the Biden Crime Family bullshit again.
2. This is not nearly the smoking gun you think it is. The principal residence issue can be complex when you are talking about people who are in the midst of moving or are splitting time between two locations.
Recognizing that Pulte could be lying, he is claiming she bought one property on June 18, 2021 in Michigan and another property on July 2, 2021 in Atlanta -- claiming both would be principal residences. The closeness in time of the two purchases is an issue.

Now, using federal data to go after enemies is an issue. Also, it is dubious that pre-Fed conduct qualifies as "cause" to terminate a fed governor. But it is hard to see how to justify purchasing two primary residences within two weeks.
 
Recognizing that Pulte could be lying, he is claiming she bought one property on June 18, 2021 in Michigan and another property on July 2, 2021 in Atlanta -- claiming both would be principal residences. The closeness in time of the two purchases is an issue.
An issue, yes, but not a smoking gun. I admit to not knowing residential real estate financing inside and out, but some other considerations:

1. She was buying properties where she didn't live or work, but would have been obvious places for her to work. Ann Arbor in particular screams, "I am lateralling to U of M."

2. Interest rates were about to go up, so she wanted to buy right then. It's possible she didn't know which job she was going to take, and then a third job came up . . . .

3. It is implausible to me that the mortgage lenders didn't know about the other mortgage. If they were fine with "intent for primary residence" then presumably they had more information about the situation than we currently do.

4. She ostensibly tried to put the Atlanta property up for rent in September 2022. That strongly suggests that she had been trying to sell it but, in the poor home buying environment, was unable to. So, like heelinhell, she saw renting as the only option. That would be not in any way illegal, I don't think, because the form asks about intent to use as a primary residence.
 
3. It is implausible to me that the mortgage lenders didn't know about the other mortgage. If they were fine with "intent for primary residence" then presumably they had more information about the situation than we currently do.
Re No. 3, the first wouldn't know about the second and the second likely only knew about the first if she disclosed it. The lenders typically just run the credit reports and mortgages in progress likely would not show up on the report (and hard credit inquiries would simply look like she was shopping lenders).

As for your last sentence, I assume you are happy with the NY appellate ruling on Trump -- if the lenders don't care, then neither do I?
 
Back
Top