Election legal battles & fraud claims

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 330
  • Views: 8K
  • Politics 
My recollection is that Gorsuch, Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh would have gone Trump's way in the PA case, but Roberts went with the liberal justices and so the vote was 4-4 which upheld the PA Supreme Court decision

I think there wasn't a 9th justice because ACB had not been confirmed. How would she have voted ?
The PA case would not have materially impacted the race.
 
They didn’t in 2020. I mean they are four years closer to retirement now, but I don’t think that gets a very big “co” in the “Alito and co.”
That's not exactly true. Alito ordered some of the ballots to be segregated. It turned out they weren't enough to swing the election, so the case became moot. But they were at least halfway to intervening. Also, ACB wasn't on the court yet.

Also, what has changed is the radicalization. Do you think they would have issued the immunity decision they did in 2021? I don't.
 
The PA case would not have materially impacted the race.
Right, but that cuts against your claims here. We never got a decision there because it didn't matter. But there were at least four votes to fuck Biden. And we don't know what ACB would do, but I'd say she's more than 50% likely to side with Trump on virtually anything.

Remember: the immunity decision is a Dred Scott level fuck up. Anyone who joined that opinion abandoned any effort at appearing non-partisan. And six joined it.
 
Right, but that cuts against your claims here. We never got a decision there because it didn't matter. But there were at least four votes to fuck Biden. And we don't know what ACB would do, but I'd say she's more than 50% likely to side with Trump on virtually anything.

Remember: the immunity decision is a Dred Scott level fuck up. Anyone who joined that opinion abandoned any effort at appearing non-partisan. And six joined it.
But the PA case was reasonably debatable (or at least debatable). The Texas case truly was bat shit crazy, as were most of the other 60+ cases that Trump filed that the Supreme Court opted not to reverse.
 
SCrOTUS. My prediction is that Harris squeaks out an E.C. win (and the popular vote, duh!), but the case goes in front of SCrOTUS. All hell could break loose.
 
But the PA case was reasonably debatable (or at least debatable). The Texas case truly was bat shit crazy, as were most of the other 60+ cases that Trump filed that the Supreme Court opted not to reverse.
I've got a bad feeling that PA Supreme Court is about to get fucked by Alito.
 
"A Pennsylvania judge on Wednesday sided with Donald Trump’s campaign and agreed to extend an in-person voting option in suburban Philadelphia, where long lines on the final day led to complaints voters were being disenfranchised by an unprepared election office.

A lawsuit demanding an extension of Tuesday’s 5pm deadline in Bucks county until today was filed this morning after long queues outside the county’s election offices on the last day for applications led to security guards cutting off the line and telling some of those waiting they would not be able to apply. ..."


Although I tend to assume the worst of Team Trump's motives, I'm always for extending opportunity to vote if there are delays.
 


“… received or submitted …” — it seems like “received” would be the key word.

Anyway, in 2020 Biden won Erie 68,286-66,869. Trump won it in 2016, 57,168-54,820. Obama won by about 19,000 votes in 2012.

Dems currently lead in returned ballots by a lot (15,286 - 6,716) in Erie.
 
“Election denial activists on Wednesday seized on errors in a routine Michigan voting report to claim that multiple people were casting ballots under a single voter’s name.


The glitch was the result of a formatting error in a routine report generated from voter roll files, Ms. Benander said in a statement. The report counted people’s past addresses on separate lines, “resulting in the same ballot for the same voter appearing on multiple lines of information all associated with one unique voter ID,” she said.

“Each of these voters only had one vote recorded for this election,” Ms. Benander said.

The incident underscores the extent to which small glitches and mistakes — which are inevitable in the management of elections by thousands of jurisdictions and all 50 states — can be amplified by a well-organized network of election denial activists bent on elevating false claims to enforce the notion promoted by Donald J. Trump and his allies that Democrats are rigging the election. …”

 
Back
Top