Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 92K
  • Politics 
Ramrouser said:
There's likely a lot of circumstantial evidence about a lot of people, including innocent people, in the Report. You don't convict people of child molestation on the circumstantial evidence or innuendo we've heard about Trump in this case. I think even you would admit that there's going to have to be some direct evidence to move the needle in this case, not more birthday cards.
Click to expand...
We’re not asking for criminal conviction. We’re asking for the president of the United States of America, who it appears is either directly implicated as a child molester himself or is implicated in the cover-up of a child molestation ring, be removed from his role as the leader of the free world. It does not necessitate a criminal conviction to remove an accused child molester from the office of the president of the United States. It simply requires people like you to find the testicular fortitude that has escaped you for your entire six or seven decades plus on this earth!
 
CFordUNC said:
We’re not asking for criminal conviction. We’re asking for the president of the United States of America, who it appears is either directly implicated as a child molester himself or is implicated in the cover-up of a child molestation ring, be removed from his role as the leader of the free world. It does not necessitate a criminal conviction to remove an accused child molester from the office of the president of the United States. It simply requires people like you to find the testicular fortitude that has escaped you for your entire six or seven decades plus on this earth!
Click to expand...
To say nothing of the enormous national security vulnerability a blackmail-able president would present in the event anyone possessed evidence that was not already public.
 
Ramrouser said:
You maintain, without evidence, that Trump is a pedo.

I maintain that this lacks any level of common sense as Dems would have released said information when they were in power in a NY minute since I believe we can all acknowledge that child molestation is a different level of a crime.

If there's concrete evidence, I'll ask that Trump step down and let JD run the show.
Click to expand...
It’s just as common sensical to figure that Dems were protecting Dems and didn’t want to go into mutually assured destruction.
 
grubar said:
The very notion that “name X appears in the Epstein files” seems sort of silly. That does not suggest guilt.
Click to expand...
For people who have any understanding of how investigations work, sure.

For most Americans and the idiotic media that chases their clicks, it will not be nearly that simple. There will be a strong “mentioned = pedophile sex trafficker” correlation drawn for pretty much everyone mentioned.
 
SnoopRob said:
For people who have any understanding of how investigations work, sure.

For most Americans and the idiotic media that chases their clicks, it will not be nearly that simple. There will be a strong “mentioned = pedophile sex trafficker” correlation drawn for pretty much everyone mentioned.
Click to expand...
I will say though, if someone is named in the Epstein emails, they were probably doing dirty.
 
Just because I know there is a bosiding bitch on this thread going

WhY dIDiN’t ThE dEmOcRaTs ReLeAsE tHeM

Those files were never a single, sealed collection set for a specific universal release date; rather, various documents from different
court cases and investigations unsealed in phases over several years, with significant releases in January 2024 and ongoing disclosures still. taking. place!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top