Epstein Files | Ghislaine Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 75K
  • Politics 
thebruinbleedstarheelblue said:
especially #2
Click to expand...
I will answer this when I get time. From a practical viewpoint, didn't the Journal say they got the letter directly from Maxwell's camp? If so, then Maxwell was angling for a pardon or at least not opposing her appeal re: non-prosecution agreement. She sent it to WSJ, expecting there to be a catch-and-kill, except the consideration would be a pardon. Hence WSJ's notifying Trump and asking for comment. But instead of playing along, Trump tried to strongarm them and the catch and kill failed.
 
RaiGuy said:
This may have been covered before, but why didn't the Biden administration release the files? One would think that it would have won the election for them, unless they are also protecting people from their side.
Click to expand...
To put it rather simply, outside of the Trump administration, the DOJ isn’t there to do the president’s political bidding and the president does not call on the DOJ to do its political bidding. Moreover, the president and the DOJ are typically not coordinating with regard to specific cases. That is, the DOJ is not reporting to the president any details on cases that don’t involve issues of national security. I think it’s safe to assume that Biden and Garland (or other folks who are high up in the DOJ) didn’t discuss the Epstein case.
 
Last edited:
nycfan said:
But today it feels like MAGA is generally coming around to support Trump against the meanie press instead of demanding Epstein files.
Click to expand...
Former COS Mick Mulvaney said in an interview (yet to be aired), “of course Trump is in the files.” This was in defense of Trump.
The gradual boiling of the frog theory in practice. Soon, “locker room fun and games” will be a part of our cultural lexicon.
 
Travis Clay just said that the underaged girls Epstein trafficked were 16 and 17 and in a lot of states that is the age of consent and if he did what he did in, say, Alabama, it wouldn’t even be illegal (huh?)
He also felt it was necessary to make the point that 50 year old men have sex with 16 and 17 year-old trafficked girls was not as bad as if they were 9 or 10 years old.

It’s telling how much the talking points have changed so quickly.
 
ChileG said:
Travis Clay just said that underaged the girls Epstein trafficked were, 16 and 17 and in a lot of states that is the age of consent and if he did what he did in,say, Alabama, it wouldn’t even be illegal.
Anyway, it’s not as bad as if they were 9 or 10.

It’s telling how much the talking points have changed already.
Click to expand...
Someone should remind that piece of shit that age is irrelevant when the girl is forced into sexual acts.
 
ChileG said:
Travis Clay just said that the underaged girls Epstein trafficked were 16 and 17 and in a lot of states that is the age of consent and if he did what he did in, say, Alabama, it wouldn’t even be illegal (huh?)
He also felt it was necessary to make the point that 50 year old men have sex with 16 and 17 year-old trafficked girls was not as bad as if they were 9 or 10 years old.

It’s telling how much the talking points have changed so quickly.
Click to expand...
Reminds me of this bit

 
Icky Mettle said:
To put it rather simply, outside of the Trump administration, the DOJ isn’t there to do the president’s political bidding and the president does not call on the DOJ to do its political bidding. Moreover, the president and the DOJ are typically not coordinating with regard to specific cases. That is, the DOJ is not reporting to the president any details on cases that don’t involve issues of national security. I think it’s safe to assume that Biden and Garland (or other folks who are high up in the DOJ) didn’t discuss the Epstein case.
Click to expand...
Forgot to add the obama administration didn't you? I mean holder was fellating obama to the point michelle was jealous.
 
theel4life said:
JFC this is far worse than Watergate. This is a full on coverup.
Click to expand...
You mean its like the biden administration covering up his mental decline? Is it that bad? Oh no, I know how the left hates cover ups. Hire some protestors. Gotta do something about this cover up
 
ChileG said:
Travis Clay just said that the underaged girls Epstein trafficked were 16 and 17 and in a lot of states that is the age of consent and if he did what he did in, say, Alabama, it wouldn’t even be illegal (huh?)
He also felt it was necessary to make the point that 50 year old men have sex with 16 and 17 year-old trafficked girls was not as bad as if they were 9 or 10 years old.

It’s telling how much the talking points have changed so quickly.
Click to expand...
Changed? Changed? I remember that back in 1975, the Oscars for: Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Director, and Best Screenplay all went to "One Flew Over the Cuckcoo's Nest." And it contained a couple of lines of dialogue that I bet St. Donald of Mar-a-Lago could emphasize with: "She was fifteen years old, going on thirty-five, Doc, and she told me she was eighteen, she was very willing, I practically had to take to sewing my pants shut. Between you and me, uh, she might have been fifteen, but when you get that little red beaver right up in front of you, I don't think it's crazy at all and I don't think you do either. No man alive could resist that, that's why I got into jail to begin with. And they're telling me I'm crazy over here because I don't sit there like a g**-d*** vegetable. Don't make a bit of sense to me. If that's what being crazy is, then I'm senseless, out of it, gone-down-the-road, wacko. But no more, no less, that's it."

Change the phrase, "that's why I got into jail to begin with" to "that's why I got into trouble with the libs to begin with" and MAGA would eat it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top