Epstein Files | They’ve released [REDACTED]

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 118K
  • Politics 
1moretimeagain said:
Saying they didn’t remove the photo because Trump was in it, but rather because it also showed the victims is probably not the best strategy.
Click to expand...
For example, if there was a photo of St. Donald of Mar-a-Lago violently raping an underage girl, then it seems the DoJ's policy would be to not release that photo on the grounds that even if the face were obscured, the victim would still recognize herself and would be forced to relive the entire event again.
 
Calheel said:
The law has already been passed. The next step is to find someone with standing (not easy) to go to court to challenge the DoJ's compliance with the law. Nothing more for Congress to do at this point.
Click to expand...
It would be quite easy if Biden were in office.
 
RockyMtnHoo said:
If Clinton (or any Dem politician or any left leaning public figure) is in the files, and an investigation reveals something criminal happened, they 100% should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Click to expand...
Normally, yes. But not now. You cannot reward the executive branch misconduct here.

He's releasing Clinton stuff to whatabout and distract. Do not take the bait. Clinton isn't the story. Clinton should not be discussed. There is only one political figure who requires attention, because he's the one obviously (grossly obviously) covering it up.
 
superrific said:
Normally, yes. But not now. You cannot reward the executive branch misconduct here.

He's releasing Clinton stuff to whatabout and distract. Do not take the bait. Clinton isn't the story. Clinton should not be discussed. There is only one political figure who requires attention, because he's the one obviously (grossly obviously) covering it up.
Click to expand...
You can't ignore Clinton if he comes up both from the moral or political sense. If we do, it gives license to plead all sorts off dispensation for Trump's behavior. Have you not seen how Biden's misuse of pardons, no matter how justifiable to protect his family and more so in retrospect, has been used to justify the gargantuan abuse by Trump?
 
finesse said:
You can't ignore Clinton if he comes up both from the moral or political sense. If we do, it gives license to plead all sorts off dispensation for Trump's behavior. Have you not seen how Biden's misuse of pardons, no matter how justifiable to protect his family and more so in retrospect, has been used to justify the gargantuan abuse by Trump?
Click to expand...
No. One person who had no capacity in the administration but was targeted by republicans. If hunter was not being politically railroaded biden would not have pardoned him. Theres a difference between Clinton being seen with epstein and trump. As far as i know no victim has come out and pointed a finger at Clinton. Trump on the other hand already has like 19 women charging him (unrelated) and with documents that shows he knew of what was going on. Again let's not get into guilt by association. If there is evidence then both should be held accountable. But despite the releases nothing bad has been associated with Clinton. Trump on the other hand there are enough info that he knew what was going on and despite that he did nothing about it letting a predator like epstein continue. I'm pretty sure all docs will be reviewed so if there is dirt on Clinton then do something. But let's not create a narrative unless there is info. I would suspect Trump's DOJ would release damaging info if it was available.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top