Epstein Files | They’ve released [REDACTED]

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 119K
  • Politics 
It isn't a smoking gun or a bloody knife or a lead pipe in the conservatory. It's a limp pool noodle. It's one sentence mentioning someone people don't like and those same people are wildly speculating about what it could and then therefore must mean. It's an accusation with no proof it even happened other than this girl's statement. And even if it did happen, it could be completely innocuous.

It's the same thing happening with all of these guys including Clinton and Gates and Giuliani and Sommers and anyone else that was friends with someone who was probably a fairly charismatic guy that also didn't mind donating money to causes these people cared about.

In this specific case, it's a recycled insinuation from a civil case that was settled by the executors of the Epstein estate 6 years ago. It is not part of these new document dumps. Those document dumps may indeed contain your smoking gun but let's wait till something real comes out so that all the nonsense accusations don't dilute it.
Or you can just take it for what it is, an unredacted anecdote among heavily redacted documents which shows that Trump was at minimum an enabler of Epstein’s crimes.

You read more into it as a straw man to attack. Same game you always play.
 
Or you can just take it for what it is, an unredacted anecdote among heavily redacted documents which shows that Trump was at minimum an enabler of Epstein’s crimes.

You read more into it as a straw man to attack. Same game you always play.
Once again, it is not part of this document dump. Its part of a civil case against the Epstein estate and has been public record for 6 years. Stop getting your news from randos on Twitter.
 
Last edited:
Once again, it is not part of this document dump. It’s part of a civil case against the Epstein estate and has been public record for 6 years. Stop getting your news from randos on Twitter.
Fair enough on the source. I just made an assumption.

I stand by my assertion that you are making a claim that it is more than it is as a straw man so that you can dismiss the real problems it presents.
 
Fair enough on the source. I just made an assumption.

I stand by my assertion that you are making a claim that it is more than it is as a straw man so that you can dismiss the real problems it presents.
I don't feel like it in anyway shows Trump was an enabler of Epstein's crimes. Its an unproven anecdote that could be completely innocuous. If it was something more, this Jane Doe could have sued Trump like she did the Epstein estate.

That's not some rebuke against her as being weak willed or a liar or whatever. Its a rebuke against a very weak implication that Trump is an enabler based on a smile, a nod and a chuckle to a neutral statement that made some girl feel uncomfortable.
 
Back
Top