Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i could b wrong but r& j only applies to under the age of 16 regardless a dozen or so is the minority of 50 states, but im speaking about the great state of NC. i would never vote for a politician who supports and doesnt vehemently oppose the age of consent being 16....i'll leave that badge of honor up to the blue and red votersBut many states (at least a dozen) have Romeo and Juliet laws so that 16 and/or 17 is not really the age of consent if there is more than a 4-5 year difference in ages.
And federal age of consent is 18.
i could b wrong but r& j only applies to under the age of 16 regardless a dozen or so is the minority of 50 states, but im speaking about the great state of NC. i would never vote for a politician who supports and doesnt vehemently oppose the age of consent being 16....i'll leave that badge of honor up to the blue and red voters
im only accountable for my actions i'll leave the unaccountability and justifications up to your kind. wear that badge proudly.
Blaming everyone else and refusing to take a side are definitely pro moves in accountability.im only accountable for my actions i'll leave the unaccountability and justifications up to your kind. wear that badge proudly.
I meant to post about your earlier post because it reminds me of hypotheticals my buddies and I pose to each other on 50/50 questions...I'll repeat what I said to callatoroy several days ago. Are the odds plus or minus 50% that Trump, while an adult, has had sex with underage girls?
The fact one has to think for more than a second about that question says it all.
If there is a 0.00001% chance any person would have to answer "yes" to that question, he or she should be categorically disqualified from serving in any position of public responsibility. That MAGA has to think about whether it's plus or minus 50% is so far beyond the realm of anything resembling conventional morality that you just have to put them in a different deplorable category.
What I think:If I understand the R and D perspectives on this situation correctly, the following things are true:
- Trump was involved in the abuse of minors along with Epstein
- Ghislaine knew this, and likely more, but decided not to leverage it to help with her sentencing
- Now that she's being asked about it, she's going to lie to possibly get her sentence reduced
- The evidence of Trump's involvement is in the "files" but the DNC kept it quiet
- or..... The Biden admin created fake files but didn't release/leak them with the hopes that, if Trump won again, his people would accidentally release them.
![]()
It is kind of interesting that Elon was the first person to say something about Epstein before the story broke wide open. Can't stand the guy but he could continue to be a thorn for Trump.So Elon says he went "too far" with his comments. He never said they weren't true, did he?
Bondi says "I didn't mean the Epstein [client] list was on my desk, I meant the file was on my desk to review" and "there is no list."
She must have a very large desk if the entire file was on it.
Maybe there are various lists, logs, appointments, receipts, ledgers, statements, bills, checks, records, etc. within the file she could release.
Just sayin'
I doubt anything that could damage the MAGA God-King will get released to the public. Even if there's video and pics of him diddling minors his base will not leave him. The cult likes to say God Guns and Trump, but in reality it's Trump Trump and Trump. In MAGA world the only thing worse than being a pedo is being a demoncrat/librul. Trump could shoot Christ resurrected on live TV and the MAGA cult would still be all in on Daddy Trump. CULT.