FAFO

  • Thread starter Thread starter UNCMSinLS
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 98K
  • Politics 
lawtig02 said:
It's notable that in all of the discussions about Ray on this board, I have never once heard you defend him on the merits. It's always been a critique of Willis. Fiat justitia ruat caelum? Not for Georgia lawyers, apparently.
Click to expand...
It is fundamentally unfair to pressure a man to testify here against his boss. Especially when the boss might or might not have access to his internet activity at work.
 
superrific said:
It is fundamentally unfair to pressure a man to testify here against his boss. Especially when the boss might or might not have access to his internet activity at work.
Click to expand...
If you’re a lawyer and you have reason to testify against your boss, you have an ethical duty to find another job. No chance that’s the reason Ram won’t defend him here.
 
lawtig02 said:
If you’re a lawyer and you have reason to testify against your boss, you have an ethical duty to find another job. No chance that’s the reason Ram won’t defend him here.
Click to expand...
I didn't mean testify in a court of law. I said here. I just don't like this line of questioning because the poster in question gives us so much fodder that we don't really have to go into it. I have no issues with mocking him for it when his position is inconsistent with his other expressed views, but dragging him for not saying his boss is a felon seems wrong. Just registering an objection.
 
superrific said:
I didn't mean testify in a court of law. I said here. I just don't like this line of questioning because the poster in question gives us so much fodder that we don't really have to go into it. I have no issues with mocking him for it when his position is inconsistent with his other expressed views, but dragging him for not saying his boss is a felon seems wrong. Just registering an objection.
Click to expand...
This is fair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top