Good faith privately-funded White House ballroom discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter lawtig02
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 367
  • Views: 5K
  • Politics 
Callatoroy said:
No it isn’t. The trump administration has been incredibly supportive of Israel despite any individual’s personal views on Israel. Trump is very pro Israel. It sounds like you are saying that just because trump appointed someone to a post that is personally anti-Semitic (your claim) that that means the administration is therefore anti-Semitic.
Click to expand...
Judaism and Israel are not the same thing any more than Iran and Islam are the same thing. Both countries are rin by vicious zealots whose only tie to relgion is that theu use it for power.
 
Callatoroy said:
No. IMO it was the right thing to do. The entire thing was based on trusting Iran. When has Iran ever been trust worthy? 24 day notice before inspection can occur and not allowing access to all areas = no credible inspection oversight. Again, trusting they are telling the truth and trusting they aren’t hiding material from inspectors. Why require 24 days before you allow inspectors in and why limit what they can inspect if you aren’t hiding anything? It also gave Iran a future US green light to enrichment with no consequences. It was a short term solution with glaring holes in it. They have to be permanently denied nuke access.

I think we would be in the same situation even with the Jpoa because Israel was adamantly opposed to it and was never going to allow Iran to get there based on its intel about how close Iran was.
Click to expand...
The JCPOA allowed the IAEA 24 hour access to Iran's nuclear facilities for continuous monitoring and the use of sophisticated surveillance technology that provided continuous surveillance information of Iran's activities to the IAEA .If suspicious activity was discovered then IAEA would implement a multi step process. It was not simply requiring IAEA a 24 day notice before any inspections could occur.

The JCPOA put effective constraints on Iran's uranium enrichment program. Iran was delighted and even celebrated when Trump tore up the agreement giving Iran the ability to return and restart their previous uranium enrichment program.
 
Last edited:
Callatoroy said:
No it isn’t. The trump administration has been incredibly supportive of Israel despite any individual’s personal views on Israel. Trump is very pro Israel. It sounds like you are saying that just because trump appointed someone to a post that is personally anti-Semitic (your claim) that that means the administration is therefore anti-Semitic.
Click to expand...
One can be both pro Israel and antisemitic. A person’s reasons for being pro Israel does not mean they favor Jewish people outside of Israel.

You said parts of the left are antisemitic or moving that way. I said parts of this administration are antisemitic. To deny that is to just be blindly partisan.
 
Callatoroy said:
No. IMO it was the right thing to do. The entire thing was based on trusting Iran. When has Iran ever been trust worthy? 24 day notice before inspection can occur and not allowing access to all areas = no credible inspection oversight. Again, trusting they are telling the truth and trusting they aren’t hiding material from inspectors. Why require 24 days before you allow inspectors in and why limit what they can inspect if you aren’t hiding anything? It also gave Iran a future US green light to enrichment with no consequences. It was a short term solution with glaring holes in it. They have to be permanently denied nuke access.

I think we would be in the same situation even with the Jpoa because Israel was adamantly opposed to it and was never going to allow Iran to get there based on its intel about how close Iran was.
Click to expand...
This is garbage. You believe bullshit.

Before Trump tore up JCPOA, Iran possessed less than 300 KG of uranium processed to 3.67% purity. After Trump’s regrettable action Iran now holds almost 9000 KG of enriched uranium, with 440 KG of that total enriched to 70% purity.

But you claim Trump tearing up the agreement was “the right thing to do.”
 
Last edited:
Callatoroy said:
No it isn’t. The trump administration has been incredibly supportive of Israel despite any individual’s personal views on Israel. Trump is very pro Israel. It sounds like you are saying that just because trump appointed someone to a post that is personally anti-Semitic (your claim) that that means the administration is therefore anti-Semitic.
Click to expand...
Yea, so supportive they let Bibi lead us into an unnecessary war, that's costing everyone of us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top