GOP & Policies toward/treatment of Transgender & other LGBTQ Americans

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 33K
  • Politics 
CFordUNC said:


I don’t think we can be entirely certain that we do not have a transgender vice president at present.
Click to expand...

I read some analysis by a makeup artist about his eyes and she concluded that he definitely didn't wear any eye makeup. I think it was on Slate.

I can't vouch for that, as I know jack shit about makeup. That's what I read, at least.
 
Why haven't I read a post from zen about this, since he's so damn worried about protecting women from people using bathrooms and playing sports, I'm sure he's really against those actually molesting 12 year olds and hiding behind their religion.

1000002865.jpg
 
superrific said:
I read some analysis by a makeup artist about his eyes and she concluded that he definitely didn't wear any eye makeup. I think it was on Slate.

I can't vouch for that, as I know jack shit about makeup. That's what I read, at least.
Click to expand...
Vance isn’t wearing eye liner. This stuff is so stupid. Guy is a loon. There’s plenty to attack without making up stuff.
 
HintonJamesHeel said:
Vance isn’t wearing eye liner. This stuff is so stupid. Guy is a loon. There’s plenty to attack without making up stuff.
Click to expand...
It's even sillier to defend Vance on this front. He absolutely wears eye liner and quite a bit of foundation as well. The inconsistency of his "look" in this regard is a dead giveaway. Personally I don't care one way or the other but both he and DJT wear a lot of makeup.
 
farce© said:
Then there are a whole host of things we should outlaw. Not just guns and alcohol, but hang gliding, rock climbing, sky diving, etc.
Click to expand...
Cars that drive faster than 25 mph, all alcohol, just two more...

A non addictive drug that doesn't impact others and isn't even sold for recreational use?

The GOP loves big intrusive government
 
aGDevil2k said:
Cars that drive faster than 25 mph, all alcohol, just two more...

A non addictive drug that doesn't impact others and isn't even sold for recreational use?

The GOP loves big intrusive government
Click to expand...
The FDA doesn't regulate any of those things. There is a long history of the FDA regulating dangerous consumable products. You could certainly make a legitimate libertarian argument otherwise, but that is not how the FDA thinks.

Edit -- Well, it does regulate alcohol, but there is a constitutional amendment on that one.
 
Last edited:
Poppers have been around a loooong time. Has their current popularity really changed? I find that hard to believe given the ease of access to Molly, coke, mushrooms etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top