Harris/Walz Catch-All | Kamala blitz in closing stretch

  • Thread starter Thread starter aGDevil2k
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 28K
  • Politics 
StrangePackage said:
Richard Spencer knows he's so fucking radioactive politically that he can read Mein Kampf on the toilet by the light of his own turds.

He's endorsing Kamala to smear her. No other reason.
Click to expand...

You must not have listened to or read his reasoning for endorsing Kamala.
 
The fact that both of them are detestable doesn't make them like each other. I suspect there is an ulterior motive in publishing this endorsement but that neither means he was responsible nor dishonest. Taking his reasoning seriously or his character has little or nothing to do with that.
 
finesse said:
The fact that both of them are detestable doesn't make them like each other. I suspect there is an ulterior motive in publishing this endorsement but that neither means he was responsible nor dishonest. Taking his reasoning seriously or his character has little or nothing to do with that.
Click to expand...
Creepily spot on.
 
lawtig02 said:
Wait, you're taking seriously the "reasoning" from the guy who organized the "Jews Will Not Replace Us" rally, but says he prefers Kamala because she'll protect Israel?
Click to expand...
Repulsive beliefs aside... yes, his reasoning for endorsing Kamala are "reasonable".
 
ZenMode said:
Repulsive beliefs aside... yes, his reasoning for endorsing Kamala are "reasonable".
Click to expand...
Coming from a different person, yes, it certainly could be. I just can't believe you think a man who has built his entire public image on being a bigoted, antisemitic, racist neo-Nazi actually subscribes to that "reasoning."
 
lightbluenc said:
How to derail a thread about the Harris campaign with discussion on the value of listening to Nazis, brought to you by...
Click to expand...
The only reason I hadn’t super ignored him yet is because the Israel-Palestine thread becomes almost unusable since he clogs it up so much. Same is happening to this thread now.
 
lightbluenc said:
How to derail a thread about the Harris campaign with discussion on the value of listening to Nazis, brought to you by...
Click to expand...
Hard to refute them if you don't know what they're saying. Rote arguments don't look good for either side.
 
lawtig02 said:
Coming from a different person, yes, it certainly could be. I just can't believe you think a man who has built his entire public image on being a bigoted, antisemitic, racist neo-Nazi actually subscribes to that "reasoning."
Click to expand...
I mean, who's knows what goes on in the mind of people who are already irrational.
 
finesse said:
Hard to refute them if you don't know what they're saying. Rote arguments don't look good for either side.
Click to expand...
I suppose if you take the position that bad faith posts need opposition for fear that passive readers are convinced by unending bad faith; or that the cosmic order needs balancing bullshit and propaganda with facts; or you simply get satisfaction.
 
Part of it is separating the wheat from the chaff. I drive a Ford even though Henry might have been the worst antisemite to ever live in America. The main one, though is that when presented with something like this, I like to use it to reevaluate if and how my views on particulars have weakened or strengthened. It's that whole self examined life thing. Complacency is too easy to take for granted. :whistle:
 
She's hitting Puerto Ricans HARD today.

Eating at a PR restaurant this evening. PR flags all over her rallies today
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top