Short answer: yes—but with real caveats. Hubert Davis is a good coach, just not universally viewed as elite (yet), especially by UNC standards.
Here’s the honest breakdown:

Why Hubert Davis is a good coach
1. Strong overall record
- Career record around 120–50 (.700 win%)
- That’s objectively very good, especially early in a career.
2. Historic early success
- Took UNC to the 2022 national title game in his first season
- One of the best first-year coaching runs in college basketball history
3. Proven ability to win big games
- Beat Duke Blue Devils at Cameron in Coach K’s final home game
- Beat Duke again in the Final Four (huge legacy moment)
4. ACC success
- Won ACC regular season title (2024) and Coach of the Year

Why people question him
1. Inconsistency year-to-year
- Seasons like: 29–10 → 20–13 → 29–8 → 23–14
- That’s good… but uneven for a blue-blood program.
2. No national title (yet)
- At UNC, the bar is Dean Smith / Roy Williams level
- Getting close isn’t enough long-term.
3. Underperformance stretches
- Some teams have:
- Barely made the tournament
- Been on the bubble
- Looked disorganized at times (criticized in recent games)
4. Rivalry record scrutiny
- Around .400 vs Duke as head coach
- That matters a lot at UNC.

The real verdict
- Floor: Clearly a good coach
- Ceiling: Still trying to prove he’s elite
Think of him like this:
He’s shown flashes of being a great coach, but hasn’t sustained it long enough yet.

Bottom line
- If you’re judging him like a normal program → definitely good
- If you’re judging him by UNC standards → good, but still under pressure