Hubert Davis Catch-all

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeoBloom
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 962
  • Views: 15K
  • UNC Sports 
Centerpiece said:
Anyway, back to Coach HD
I just off the phone with my guy with (supposedly) the inside scoop and it’s not got anything to do with HD as a coach, wins and losses, making the tournament, recruiting, etc.

Nothing at all to do with the game itself really.

It’s all about the money (and it’s got nothing to do with a Hubert contract buyout) and the DEI aspects and the total dismantling of not only the basketball team but the liberal arts college/university altogether.

The powers that be who hold sway, the 24 Board of Governors (and according to my guy there are 4 specific ones) who want to:

A. Build the new arena because one or more of them will get the building contracts or the kick backs from the money spent. (They may not get as much - if any - to reno DES.) And they don’t give a rats ass about whether or not the new arena will be beneficial or a detriment to the basketball program.

B. Fire HD because they say he was a DEI hire - and they don’t give a rats ass if anybody cares that a Black coach gets canned… or what any talking head on ESPN says or thinks about it.

C. Hire a Maga coach, or some other coach who may or may not be good for the basketball program.
(See Bill Bellycheck hiring). Those of us who are afraid of losing HD because of who the BOG will hire to replace him, are well founded in those fears.

D. This is the tip of the iceberg because the PTB/BOG arseholes won’t stop at the athletic programs. It’s all about hiring Maga and taking down the libruls en masse at All 17 UNC member institutions.


So we can all quibble about HD and his W’s and L’s; his quad 1 wins; his “bubble” teams; his recruiting; etc…. Or who his possible replacement may be whom we think may come in like a knight in shining armor and restore the once great bball program El Deano masterminded…. But it don’t mean squat.

No, it’s all about the Maga and owning the libs.

That and the money to be made by only a certain few.

Instead of arguing about who should replace Hubert, we should be arguing over who those 24 BOG arseholes are and how to get rid of them.

Basically this thread should be reclassified from UNC Sports and moved over to the politics threads because ultimately, that’s where it belongs.
Click to expand...
This is just awful if true. Not saying I think it is, but I wouldn't be shocked if it is the case. I don't think the basketball team under Hubert has been good enough consistently to keep him if this season turns out being average or bad. That is what he should be judged on, though, when it comes to being the coach or not. This political and DEI stuff is just crap.
 
From the start of HD's tenure to today there are 10 high major teams with a higher win % than UNC:

Houston (88%), Duke (82%), UCONN (80%), Purdue (80%), Arizona (79%)
Tennessee (75%), Kansas (74%), Auburn (73%), Alabama (72%), Iowa St (71%)
North Carolina (71%), Illinois (70%), UCLA (69%), Kentucky (69%), Texas Tech (68%)
Florida (68%), Mich St (68%), Clemson (68%), Wisconsin (67%), BYU (67%)
St. John's (67%), Virginia (67%), Texas A&M (66%), Creighton (65%), Baylor (65%)
 
Heelsandeers said:
From the start of HD's tenure to today there are 10 high major teams with a higher win % than UNC:

Houston (88%), Duke (82%), UCONN (80%), Purdue (80%), Arizona (79%)
Tennessee (75%), Kansas (74%), Auburn (73%), Alabama (72%), Iowa St (71%)
North Carolina (71%), Illinois (70%), UCLA (69%), Kentucky (69%), Texas Tech (68%)
Florida (68%), Mich St (68%), Clemson (68%), Wisconsin (67%), BYU (67%)
St. John's (67%), Virginia (67%), Texas A&M (66%), Creighton (65%), Baylor (65%)
Click to expand...
Interesting stat.
 
Heelsandeers said:
From the start of HD's tenure to today there are 10 high major teams with a higher win % than UNC:

Houston (88%), Duke (82%), UCONN (80%), Purdue (80%), Arizona (79%)
Tennessee (75%), Kansas (74%), Auburn (73%), Alabama (72%), Iowa St (71%)
North Carolina (71%), Illinois (70%), UCLA (69%), Kentucky (69%), Texas Tech (68%)
Florida (68%), Mich St (68%), Clemson (68%), Wisconsin (67%), BYU (67%)
St. John's (67%), Virginia (67%), Texas A&M (66%), Creighton (65%), Baylor (65%)
Click to expand...
Laying down the stats. But the Hubert haters will claim not enough quad 1 wins, and the numbers are padded with a watered down ACC.

All of this would be worth the back and forth if the PTB gave two shits about it all. They don’t.

It’s a Maga eat Maga world out there boys and girls and we’re all wearing see through progressive underwear.
 
Houston does have a few American years in there which skews their win %

Still, that top tier has been in a league of its own. The rest? A lot of similarities
 
stankeylegjones said:
FD has us at +7.5. That’s shocking, even with CWilson out. Like close to a toss up with him on a neutral court.
Click to expand...
By the metrics (that don't really account for CW being out), we're a ~3 point dog, so 7.5 is a bit of an adjustment.

Given that home court is typically 3 points over a neutral court, the metrics (again, largely with Caleb) have this game as a toss up.
 
SnoopRob said:
By the metrics (that don't really account for CW being out), we're a ~3 point dog, so 7.5 is a bit of an adjustment.

Given that home court is typically 3 points over a neutral court, the metrics (again, largely with Caleb) have this game as a toss up.
Click to expand...
If we can keep it close, I have total confidence that lolncstate will find a way to fuck up and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory at the end.
 
heel79 said:


I have been saying this for a couple of weeks. Hubert really good with the Xs and Os.
Click to expand...

That was against NC Central. They usually struggle against any decent team that plays zone against them. They struggled with it against Miami. I am pretty sure in at least one of their losses against SMU, Cal and Stanford they also faced a zone.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top