I'm just using efficiency metrics because they are not, like wins and losses, subject to the wildly varying strength of schedule that college bball teams play. Focusing only on total wins and losses without any other context (like looking at who we played, or how utterly embarrassing the losses were) is a great way to get an extremely misleading picture. You are giving credit for stacking meaningless wins against terrible teams in a historically bad ACC, which is a pointless exercise when judging performance at a school like UNC.
Also, note that I very clearly didn't call it a "bad season." I said it was a really bad 2/3 of a season, followed by a brilliant final third. It is, as I noted, very reminiscent of NC State's 2024 season where they were bad most of the season then had a transcendent postseason that surely made the season very memorable for their fans. And also somewhat reminiscent of the last time an 8-sed UNC went to the FF in 2000. I don't want you or anyone else to give up the special memories from late February/March of that season. I'm not giving mine up. But if we have to rely on seasons where we get an 8 seed and make a miracle tournament run as the "good" seasons for our program, that isn't a very sustainable model. (Note that the 2000 UNC season and 2024 NC State season were not indicative of programs in good shape.) The best sign of an elite program is that they are consistently playing well enough in the regular season to earn high NCAAT seeds. Focusing too heavily on tournament results is fool's gold.